Abstract
It is well known that modal parameters play a key role towards understanding the dynamics of a structure. Their estimation, by means of experiments, forms the crux of modal analysis. Modal parameters not only help in characterizing the dynamics of the structure but are also used for several other purposes including, finite element model updating, design optimization, sensitivity analysis, etc. It is therefore important to estimate them accurately and several modal parameter estimation techniques have been developed over the years for this purpose. Despite advance methods, estimation of modal parameters is always accompanied with certain uncertainty, which can be attributed to several factors including, noisy measurements, complexities inherent in the structure, modeling errors etc. Remarkably, the usual practice is to provide the estimated modal parameters as they are, without providing any means to validate the accuracy of these estimates. In other words, the estimation procedure often does not include, or overlooks, the measures for quantifying the uncertainty associated with estimated modal parameters.
In this work, a methodology to quantify uncertainty associated with the modal parameters estimated using Experimental Modal Analysis techniques is developed. This methodology is termed as Bootstrapping based Modal Parameter Uncertainty Quantification (MPUQ-b). The proposed methodology utilizes the technique of Bootstrapping, which is a computer intensive method for statistical inference. In this first paper, the fundamentals of this methodology are laid out. The paper focuses on illustrating the characteristics of Bootstrapping and its effectiveness for the intended use of modal parameter uncertainty quantification. By means of studies conducted on a simple single degree of freedom system, it is shown how Bootstrapping can be employed for quantifying the uncertainty associated with estimated modal parameters by providing such measures of accuracy as variance, confidence intervals, bias etc. Incorporation of bootstrapping in modal parameter estimation procedure forms the essence of MPUQ-b and is detailed in a subsequent paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
Confidence intervals
- EMA:
-
Experimental modal analysis
- FRF:
-
Frequency response function
- IRF:
-
Impulse response function
- MPUQ-b:
-
Bootstrapping based Modal Parameter Uncertainty Quantification
- OMA:
-
Operational modal analysis
- SDOF:
-
Single degree-of-freedom
- SNR:
-
Signal-to-noise ratio
- SSI:
-
Stochastic subspace identification
References
Reynders, E., Pintelon, R., De Roeck, G.: Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 22, 948–969 (2008)
Bendat, J.S., Piersol, A.G.: Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis, Second edn. John Wiley, NY, USA (1993)
Pintelon, R., Guillaume, P., Schoukens, J.: Uncertainty calculation in (operational) modal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 21, 2359–2373 (2007)
Brincker, R., Andersen, P.: Understanding stochastic subspace identification. In: Proceedings of 24th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), St. Louis (MO), USA (2006)
Dohler, M., Lam, X.B., Mevel, L.: Efficient multi-order uncertainty computation for stochastic subspace identification. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 38, 346–366 (2013)
Dohler, M., Lam, X.B., Mevel, L.: Uncertainty quantification for modal parameters from stochastic subspace identification on multi-setup measurements. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 36, 562–581 (2013)
Taylor, J.R.: An Introduction to Error Analysis, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito, CA, (1997)
Hunter, N.F., Paez, T.L.: Application of the bootstrap to the analysis of vibration test data. In: 66th Shock and Vibration Symposium, Biloxi, MS (1995)
Farrar, C.R., Doebling, S.W., Cornwell, P.J.: A comparison study of modal parameter confidence intervals computed using the Monte Carlo and bootstrap techniques. In: Proceedings of the 16th IMAC, Santa Barbara, CA, USA (1998)
Efron, B.: Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat. 7, 1–26 (1979)
Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York (1993)
Lefebvre, M.: Applied Probability and Statistics. Springer, New York (2006)
Horowitz, J.L.: The bootstrap. Handb. Econ. 5, 3159–3228 (2001)
Haukoos, J.S., Lewis, R.J.: Advanced statistics: bootstrapping confidence intervals for statistics with “difficult” distributions. Acad. Emerg. Med. 12(4), 360–365 (2005)
Heylen, W., Lammens, S., Sas, P.: Modal analysis theory and testing. PMA Katholieke Universteit, Leuven (1995)
Brown, D.L., Allemang, R.J., Zimmerman, R., Mergeay, M.: Parameter estimation techniques for modal analysis. In: SAE Paper No. 790221, SAE Transactions, vol. 88, pp. 828–846 (1979)
Henze, H., Zirkler, B.: A class of invariant consistent tests for multivariate normality. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods. 19(10), 3595–3617 (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chauhan, S., Ahmed, S.I. (2017). MPUQ-b: Bootstrapping Based Modal Parameter Uncertainty Quantification—Fundamental Principles. In: Barthorpe, R., Platz, R., Lopez, I., Moaveni, B., Papadimitriou, C. (eds) Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54858-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54858-6_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54857-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54858-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)