Skip to main content

MPUQ-b: Bootstrapping Based Modal Parameter Uncertainty Quantification—Fundamental Principles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3

Abstract

It is well known that modal parameters play a key role towards understanding the dynamics of a structure. Their estimation, by means of experiments, forms the crux of modal analysis. Modal parameters not only help in characterizing the dynamics of the structure but are also used for several other purposes including, finite element model updating, design optimization, sensitivity analysis, etc. It is therefore important to estimate them accurately and several modal parameter estimation techniques have been developed over the years for this purpose. Despite advance methods, estimation of modal parameters is always accompanied with certain uncertainty, which can be attributed to several factors including, noisy measurements, complexities inherent in the structure, modeling errors etc. Remarkably, the usual practice is to provide the estimated modal parameters as they are, without providing any means to validate the accuracy of these estimates. In other words, the estimation procedure often does not include, or overlooks, the measures for quantifying the uncertainty associated with estimated modal parameters.

In this work, a methodology to quantify uncertainty associated with the modal parameters estimated using Experimental Modal Analysis techniques is developed. This methodology is termed as Bootstrapping based Modal Parameter Uncertainty Quantification (MPUQ-b). The proposed methodology utilizes the technique of Bootstrapping, which is a computer intensive method for statistical inference. In this first paper, the fundamentals of this methodology are laid out. The paper focuses on illustrating the characteristics of Bootstrapping and its effectiveness for the intended use of modal parameter uncertainty quantification. By means of studies conducted on a simple single degree of freedom system, it is shown how Bootstrapping can be employed for quantifying the uncertainty associated with estimated modal parameters by providing such measures of accuracy as variance, confidence intervals, bias etc. Incorporation of bootstrapping in modal parameter estimation procedure forms the essence of MPUQ-b and is detailed in a subsequent paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence intervals

EMA:

Experimental modal analysis

FRF:

Frequency response function

IRF:

Impulse response function

MPUQ-b:

Bootstrapping based Modal Parameter Uncertainty Quantification

OMA:

Operational modal analysis

SDOF:

Single degree-of-freedom

SNR:

Signal-to-noise ratio

SSI:

Stochastic subspace identification

References

  1. Reynders, E., Pintelon, R., De Roeck, G.: Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 22, 948–969 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bendat, J.S., Piersol, A.G.: Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis, Second edn. John Wiley, NY, USA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pintelon, R., Guillaume, P., Schoukens, J.: Uncertainty calculation in (operational) modal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 21, 2359–2373 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brincker, R., Andersen, P.: Understanding stochastic subspace identification. In: Proceedings of 24th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), St. Louis (MO), USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dohler, M., Lam, X.B., Mevel, L.: Efficient multi-order uncertainty computation for stochastic subspace identification. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 38, 346–366 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dohler, M., Lam, X.B., Mevel, L.: Uncertainty quantification for modal parameters from stochastic subspace identification on multi-setup measurements. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 36, 562–581 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor, J.R.: An Introduction to Error Analysis, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito, CA, (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hunter, N.F., Paez, T.L.: Application of the bootstrap to the analysis of vibration test data. In: 66th Shock and Vibration Symposium, Biloxi, MS (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farrar, C.R., Doebling, S.W., Cornwell, P.J.: A comparison study of modal parameter confidence intervals computed using the Monte Carlo and bootstrap techniques. In: Proceedings of the 16th IMAC, Santa Barbara, CA, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Efron, B.: Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat. 7, 1–26 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York (1993)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lefebvre, M.: Applied Probability and Statistics. Springer, New York (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Horowitz, J.L.: The bootstrap. Handb. Econ. 5, 3159–3228 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haukoos, J.S., Lewis, R.J.: Advanced statistics: bootstrapping confidence intervals for statistics with “difficult” distributions. Acad. Emerg. Med. 12(4), 360–365 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heylen, W., Lammens, S., Sas, P.: Modal analysis theory and testing. PMA Katholieke Universteit, Leuven (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brown, D.L., Allemang, R.J., Zimmerman, R., Mergeay, M.: Parameter estimation techniques for modal analysis. In: SAE Paper No. 790221, SAE Transactions, vol. 88, pp. 828–846 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Henze, H., Zirkler, B.: A class of invariant consistent tests for multivariate normality. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods. 19(10), 3595–3617 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Chauhan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chauhan, S., Ahmed, S.I. (2017). MPUQ-b: Bootstrapping Based Modal Parameter Uncertainty Quantification—Fundamental Principles. In: Barthorpe, R., Platz, R., Lopez, I., Moaveni, B., Papadimitriou, C. (eds) Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54858-6_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54858-6_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54857-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54858-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics