Advertisement

Learning Outcomes of School Children

  • Vani Kant Borooah
Chapter

Abstract

Borooah employs a unique set of data, encompassing India and its several social groups, to gauge the size of the educational gap between children, aged 8–11 years, belonging to the different social groups in India. These data, culled from the Indian Human Development Survey (Desai et al. 2015), tested approximately 12,000 children, aged 8–11, for their ability to read, write, and do arithmetic at different levels of competence. He analyses, on the basis of econometric investigation, why children have different levels of educational achievement. In particular, he investigates whether, after controlling for other factors – for example, parental education or household income – there might be a role for gender, caste, and religion in explaining differences between children in their learning outcomes.

Keywords

Indian Human Development Survey Learning Outcomes Inter-Group Differences Equity-Adjustment Discriminatory Treatment in Schools 

References

  1. Akerlof, G.A., and Kranton, R.E. (2010), Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand, S., and Sen, A.K. (1997). Concepts of Human Development and Poverty: A Multidimensional Perspective, Human Development Report 1997 Papers, New York, UNDP.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, A.B. (1970), “On the Measurement of Inequality”, Journal of Economic Theory, 2: 3, 244–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhalotra, S., and Zamora, B. (2010), “Social Divisions in Education in India”, In R. Basant and A. Shariff (eds). Handbook of Muslims in India: Empirical and Policy Perspectives, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 165–198.Google Scholar
  5. Borooah, V.K. (2001), Logit and Probit: Ordered and Multinomial Models, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Borooah, V.K., and Iyer, S. (2005), “Vidya, Veda, and Varna: The Influence of Religion and Caste on Education in Rural India”, Journal of Development Studies, 41: 1369–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, H. (1989), Homework, White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  8. De Fraja, G., Oliveira, T., and Zanchi, L. (2010), “Must Try Harder: Evaluating the Role of Effort in Educational Attainment”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 92: 577–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deolalikar, A.B. (2010), “The Performance of Muslims on Social Indicators: A Comparative Perspective”, In R. Basant and A. Shariff (eds). Handbook of Muslims in India: Empirical and Policy Perspectives, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 71–91.Google Scholar
  10. Desai, S., Dubey, A., and Vanneman, R. (2015), India Human Development Survey-II, University of Maryland and National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi, Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
  11. Desai, S., and Vanneman, R. (2009), India Human Development Survey (IHDS), 2005 [Computer file]. ICPSR22626-v5, Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2009-06-22, 10.3886/ICPSR22626Google Scholar
  12. Dufur, M., Parcel, T.L., and Troutman, K.P. (2013), “Does Capital at Home Matter More than Capital at School? Social Capital Effects on Academic Achievement”, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 31: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furnham, A., Reeves, E., and Budhani, S. (2002), “Parents Think their Sons are Brighter than their Daughters: Sex Differences in Parental Self-estimations and Estimations of their Children’s Multiple Intelligences”, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163: 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanushek, E.A., and Woessmann, L. (2008), “The Role of Cognitive Skills in Economic Development”, Journal of Economic Literature, 46: 607–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoff, K., and Pandey, P. (2006), “Discrimination, Social Identity, and Durable Inequalities”, American Economic Review, 96: 206–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Human Rights Watch (2014), “They Say We Are Dirty”: Denying Education to India’s Marginalised, New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
  17. Keith, T.Z. (1982), “Time Spent on Homework and High School Grades: A Large-sample Path Analysis”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 74: 248–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. LeTendre, G.K. (2015), “Homework Could Have an Impact on Kids’ Health: Should Schools Ban It?”, http://theconversation.com/homework-could-have-an-impact-on-kids-health-should-schools-ban-it-46246 (accessed 18 November 2016).
  19. Li, Q. (1999), “Teachers’ Beliefs and Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Review”, Educational Research, 41: 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. m Lindberg, S.M., Hyde, J.S., and Petersen, J.L. (2010), “New Trends in Gender and Mathematical Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Psycho Bull, 136: 1123–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Long, J.S., and Freese, J. (2014), Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables using Stata, College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  22. Muralidharan, K. and Sundararaman (2013), “The Aggregate Effect of School Choice: Evidence from a Two-stage Experiment in India”, Working Paper 19441, National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Nambissan, G.B. (2010), “Exclusion and Discrimination in Schools”, In S. Throat and K. S. Newman (eds.), Blocked by Caste: Economic Discrimination in Modern India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 253–286.Google Scholar
  24. Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R., and Greenwald, A.G. (2002), “Math = Male, Me = Female, Therefore Math Not = Me”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 44–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nosek, B.A., Smyth, F.L., and Sriram, N. (2009), “National Differences in Gender–science Stereotypes Predict National Sex Differences in Science and Math Achievement”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 106: 10593–10597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. OECD (2001), Knowledge and skills for life: first results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parcel, T.L., and Dufur, M. (2009), “Family and School Capital Explaining Regional Variation in Math and Reading Achievement”, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 27: 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramachandran, V., and Naorem, T. (2013), “What it Means to be a Dalit or Tribal Child in our Schools”, Economic and Political Weekly, XLVIII: 43–52.Google Scholar
  29. Sainath, P. (2002), “Dalits in India 2000: The Scheduled Castes More than a Half Century After Independence”, Asia Source, www.asiasource.org/asip/dalits.cfm
  30. Sharp, C., Keys, W., and Benefield, P. (2001), Homework: A Review of Recent Research, Slough (Berkshire): National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  31. Thorat (2007), “Caste Discrimination in AIIMS”, Economic and Political Weekly, 42: 2032.Google Scholar
  32. Thorat, S., and Joel Lee, J. (2010), “Food Security Schemes and Caste Discrimination”, In S. Thorat and K. S. Newman (eds.), Blocked by Caste: Economic Discrimination in Modern India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vani Kant Borooah
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Economics & PoliticsUniversity of UlsterNewtownabbeyUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations