Abstract
The chapter investigates the methodological background of modern attempts to establish the names for current and future type of our socio-economic system. It is shown that unexpectedly many experts came back to the old used terminology and have offered to define new phenomena to use category of “industrialization” in different combinations, but not using category of “innovation”. The chapter analyses such controversy and considers nessecity the recognition of Schumpeterian conception as the new mainstream of economic theory. The traditional economic programmes pay attention on the competitive advantages of available resources with proposals of their further modernization. Modern Schumpeterian programmes must be to elaborate the innovation model focusing on the creation of new knowledge resources for gaining new competitive advantages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aghion, P., J. Boulanger, and E. Cohen. (2011). Rethinking industrial policy, Bruegel Policy Brief 2011/04, Brüssels.
Amidon, D.M., P. Formica, and E. Mercier-Laurent eds. (2005). Knowledge Economics: Principles, Practices and Policies. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
Bazhal, I. (2003). Economy of knowledge: theory and state policy (in Ukrainian). Economics and Forecasting 3: 71–86.
Bazhal, I. et al. (2002). Economic evaluation of state priorities for the technological development. Kyiv: Publishing of Institute for Economic Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian).
Bell, D. (1967). Notes on the postindustrial society //the public interest, – 1967. No. 7. – 102–18.
Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
Cantwell, J, and E Amann eds. (2012). The Innovatives Firm in the Emerging Market Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carayannis, E.G. Ed. (2013). The Innovation Union in Europe: A Socio-Economic Perspective on EU Integration. Cheltenham UK, Northhampton MA USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Castells, M. (1999). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Cambridge, Mass; Oxford: Blackwell
Confucian Analects (2006) The Great Learning, and the Doctrine of the Mean. The Chinese Classics I. Translated by. James Legge London: Trübner. Revised second edition. Chapter 13. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Deyo, F. ed. (1987). The Political Economy of the Newasian Industrialism. Ithaca, New York and London: Cornell Un. Press.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants of technical change. Research Policy 11: 147–62.
Dosi, G. (1984). Technological Change and Industrial Transformation. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dosi, G., C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete Eds. (1988). Technical Change and Economic Theory. Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies. Pisa, Italy.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM. (2010) 2020 final. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2014). For a European Industrial Renaissance. COM(2014) 14 final. Brussels: European Commission.
Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Cambridge (Massachusetts): The MIT Press.
Freeman, C., and F. Louca. (2001). As Time Goes by: From the Industrial Revolution to the Information Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The New Industrial State. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Hanusch, H., and A. Pyka Eds. (2007). Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics (Elgar Original Reference). Cheltenham UK, Northhampton MA USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lee, K. (2016). Economic Catch-up and Technological Leapfrogging: The Path to Development and Macroeconomic Stability in Korea. Cheltenham UK, Northhampton MA USA: Edward Elgar Publ.
Lundvall, B.A. ed. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Lundvall Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers
Mathews, J.A. (2006). catch-up strategies and the latecomer effect in industrial development. New Political Economy 11(3): 301–36.
Mensch, G. (1979). Stalemate in Technology: Innovations Overcome the Depression. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Ballinger.
Nelson, R.R. ed. (1993). National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peneder, M., and G. Streicher. (2016). De- versus re-industrialisation: is structural change reversible? – WIFO Working Papers, No. 506, January 2016.
Perez, C. (2002). Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rodrigues, M.J. ed. (2002). The new knowledge economy in Europe – A strategy for international competitiveness and social cohesion. with the collaboration of R. Boyer, M. Castells, G. Esping-Andersen, R. Lindley, B.A. Lundvall, L. Soete, M. Telò and M. Tomlinson. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA. USA: Edward Elgar.
Rodrigues, M.J. (2003). European Policies for a knowledge Economy. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Rooney, D., G. Hearn, T. Mandeville, and R. Joseph. (2003). Public policy in knowledge-based economies: foundations and frameworks. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Smits, R.E., S. Kuhlmann, and P. Shapira Eds. (2010). The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy: An International Research Handbook. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Soete, L. (2001). The new economy: A European perspective. In Daniele Archibugi and Bengt-Åke Lundvall (eds.), The Globalizing Learning Economy, New York: Oxford University Press, 21–44
Terry, E. ([2002] 2015). How Asia got Rich. Japan: China and the Asian miracle. London and New York: Routledge.
The Platform Industrie 4.0. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. (2013). - National Academy of Science and Engineering.
Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. New York: William Morrow Company, Inc.
Tregenna, F. (2012). Manufacturing productivity, deindustrialization, and reindustrialization. United Nations University. Retrieved February 2, 2012.
World Bank. (1993). The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (1999).World development report 1998/99: Knowledge for Development. The World Bank. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bazhal, I. (2017). Innovation Development Versus Re-industrialization . In: The Political Economy of Innovation Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54852-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54852-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54851-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54852-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)