Interconnected Microgrid Systems for Remote Areas



To reduce the frequency and necessity of load-shedding in a remote area microgrid during autonomous operation, islanded neighboring microgrids can be interconnected temporarily to support each other, if a proper overload management technique is in place and an extra generation capacity is available in the distributed energy resources in the neighboring microgrids. Otherwise, due to the unavailability of a utility feeder in remote areas, load-shedding is the only alternative to managing an overloaded microgrid. This way, the total demand of the system of coupled microgrids will be shared by all the distributed energy resources within these microgrids. To this end, a carefully designed overload management technique, protection systems, and communication infrastructure are required at the network and microgrid levels. In this chapter, first, the conditions and constraints based on which two neighboring microgrids are coupled are described. This is extended to develop an algorithm which identifies suitable microgrids to support the overloaded microgrid(s) when several neighboring microgrids exist in the distribution network.


Coupled microgrids Overload management technique Decision-making 


  1. 1.
    R. Paleta, A. Pina and C.A.S. Silva, “Polygeneration energy container: designing and testing energy services for remote developing communities,” IEEE Trans. on Sustainable Energy, Vol. 5, pp. 1348–1355, 2014.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Arriaga, C.A Canizares and M. Kazerani, “Northern lights: access to electricity in Canada’s northern and remote communities,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, Vol. 12, pp. 50–59, 2014.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Ubilla, et al. “Smart microgrids as a solution for rural electrification: ensuring long-term sustainability through cadastre and business models” IEEE Trans. on Sustainable Energy, Vol. 5, pp. 1310–1318, 2014.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y.M. Atwa, E.F.El-Saadany, M.M.A. Salama, et al., “Adequacy evaluation of distribution system including wind/solar DG during different modes of operation,” IEEE Trans. on Power System, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1945–1952, 2011.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.M. Guerrero, J.C. Vasquez, J. Matas, et al., “Hierarchical control of droop-controlled ac and dc microgrids- A general approach toward standardization,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 158–172, 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Kroposki, R. Lasseter, T. Ise, et al., “Making microgrids work,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 40–53, 2008.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y.Y. Hong, M.C. Hsiao, Y.R. Chang, et al., “Multiscenario underfrequency load shedding in a microgrid consisting of intermittent renewables,” IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1610–1617, 2013.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Pashajavid, F. Shahnia and A. Ghosh, “Overload management of autonomous microgrids,” IEEE 11th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS), pp. 73–78, Australia, 2015.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Bahramirad, W. Reder and A. Khodaei, “Reliability-constrained optimal sizing of energy storage system in a microgrid,” IEEE Trans. on Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 2056–2062, 2012.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.A. Arefifar and Y.A.R.I. Mohamed, “DG Mix, reactive sources and energy storage units for optimizing microgrid reliability and supply security,” IEEE Trans. on Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1835–1844, 2014.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.A. Arefifar, Y.A.I. Mohamed and T.H.M. EL-Fouly, “Optimum microgrid design for enhancing reliability and supply-security,” IEEE Trans. on Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1567–1575, 2013.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Majumder, A. Ghosh, G. Ledwich and F. Zare, “Power management and power flow control with back-to-back converters in a utility connected microgrid,” IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 821–834, 2010.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Pashajavid, F. Shahnia, and A. Ghosh, “Development of a self-healing strategy to enhance the overloading resilience of islanded microgrids,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 868–880, 2017.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.H. Lasseter, “Smart distribution: coupled microgrids,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 1074–1082, 2011.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Shahnia, R.P.S. Chandrasena, S. Rajakaruna, A. Ghosh, “Primary control level of parallel distributed energy resources converters in system of multiple interconnected autonomous microgrids within self-healing networks” IET Generation Transmission Distribution, vol. 8, pp. 203–222, 2014.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Fathi and H. Bevrani, “Statistical cooperative power dispatching in interconnected microgrids,” IEEE Trans. on Sustainable Energy., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 586–593, 2013.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Pashajavid, F. Shahnia and A. Ghosh, “Overloading conditions management in remote networks by coupling neighboring microgrids,” 50th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), pp. 1–6, UK, 2015.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. Pashajavid, F. Shahnia and A. Ghosh, “Interconnection of two neighboring autonomous microgrids based on small signal analysis,” 9th International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia (ICPE-ECCE Asia), pp. 213–220, Korea, 2015.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. Pashajavid, F. Shahnia and A. Ghosh, “A decentralized strategy to remedy the power deficiency in remote area microgrids,” 50th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), pp. 1–6, UK, 2015.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Bourbour, F. Shahnia and A. Ghosh, “Selection of a suitable microgrid to couple with an overloaded neighboring microgrid based on decision making,” North American Power Symposium (NAPS), pp. 1–6, USA, 2015.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S.M. Chen and C.H. Wang, “A generalized model for prioritized multicriteria decision making systems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, Issue 3, pp. 4773–4783, 2009.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    P.Ya. Ekel, J.S.C. Martini and R.M. Palhares, “Multicriteria analysis in decision making under information uncertainty,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 200, Issue 2, pp. 501–516, 2008.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    N. Fenton and W. Wang, “Risk and confidence analysis for fuzzy multicriteria decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 19, Issue 6, pp. 430–437, 2006.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Campanella and R.A. Ribeiro, “A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 52, Issue 1, pp. 52–60, 2011.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    F. Shahnia, S. Bourbour and A. Ghosh, “Coupling neighboring microgrids for overload management based on dynamic multicriteria decision-making,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 969–983, 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering and Information TechnologyMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations