Theoretical Framework

  • John E. Spillan
  • Nicholas Virzi


In this chapter the theoretical framework of the book is laid out. This is important to do to understand what a groundbreaking achievement the Pacific Alliance is. Liberal Free trade theory is used against the context of the Latin American experience with free trade regimes prior to the Great Depression. Strategic Trade theory is used to describe and evaluate the Import-Substitution-Industrialization policies of protectionism that Latin American countries have so often applied with little success. Finally, an Ordoliberal perspective, integrating New Institutional Economics and Public Choice contributions, is applied to the understanding of the new institutional arrangements behind competition laws and free trade agreements.


  1. Anderson, J. (na). International trade theory, Boston College, p. 11. A:
  2. Barshefsky, C. (1999). U.S. trade representative, testimony on U.S. priorities at the WTO ministerial in Seattle, Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, U.S. Senate, 106th Cong., 1st Sess., June 24, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. Chafuen, A. A., & Guzmán, E. (2000). Chapter 3, Economic freedom and corruption. In G. P. O’Driscoll, Jr., K. R. Holmes, and M. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), 2000 index of economic freedom. Washington, D.C.: The Heritage Foundation and Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, R. (1968). The economics of interdependence: Economic policy in the Atlantic community (p. 70, 269) New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Dullien, S., & Guerot, U. (2012). The long shadow of ordoliberalism: Germany’s approach to the euro crisis. Policy Brief. European Council on Foreign Relations. February, 2012. Available in:
  6. Froning, D. H. (2000). The benefits of free trade: A guide for policymakers.
  7. Gerber, D. (1995). Competition law and international trade: The European Union and the neo-liberal factor. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Association, 4(1), 38–57.Google Scholar
  8. Joerges, C., & Petersmann, E.-U. (2006). Constitutionalism, multilevel trade governance and social regulation (p. 243). Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Lecture 28. (na). Economics 181, International trade, Berkeley. Available in:
  10. Müller, J.-W. (2012). What do Germans think about when they think about Europe? London Review of Books, London, 34(3) 9 February 2012, 18–19.Google Scholar
  11. Nollen, S. D., & Quinn, D. P. (1994). Free trade, fair trade, strategic trade, and protectionism in the U.S. Congress, 1987–88. International Organization, 48(3), 497.Google Scholar
  12. Postolachi, A., & Liviu, M. (2012). Theoretical controversies on strategic trade policy, p. 50. Available in:
  13. Stark, J. (2008). Executive board of the ECB, 11th Euro Finance Week in Frankfurt, Germany.
  14. The Economist. (2015). Germany and economics: Of rules and order. Berlin: The Economist.Google Scholar
  15. Tomz, M. (2013). Public opinion and the democratic peace. American Political Science Review, 107(3), August 2013, Stanford, 16.Google Scholar
  16. Young, B. (2014). German ordoliberalism as agenda setter for the euro crisis: Myth trumps reality. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Jul 2014, 22(3), 276–287, 12p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • John E. Spillan
    • 1
  • Nicholas Virzi
    • 2
  1. 1.University of North Carolina at PembrokePinehurstUSA
  2. 2.Universidad Pontificia de SalamancaSanta Catarina PinulaGuatemala

Personalised recommendations