Advertisement

ExTest Scheduling and Optimization

  • Ran WangEmail author
  • Krishnendu Chakrabarty
Chapter
  • 328 Downloads

Abstract

A large number of input and output (I/O) ports are available for the dies in a 2.5D IC.

References

  1. 1.
    K. Kumagai, Y. Yoneda, H. Izumino, H. Shimojo, M. Sunohara, T. Kurihara, M. Higashi, Y. Mabuchi, A silicon interposer BGA package with Cu-filled TSV and multi-layer Cu-plating interconnect, in IEEE Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2008, pp. 571–576Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.-Y. Huang, L.-R. Huang, Delay testing and characterization of post-bond interposer wires in 2.5-D ICs, in IEEE International Test Conference (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.-Y. Huang, J.-Y. Lee, K.-H. Tsai, W.-T. Cheng, At-speed BIST for interposer wires supporting on-the-spot diagnosis, in International On-Line Test Symposium (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C.-C. Chi, B.-Y. Lin, C.-W. Wu, M.-J. Wang, H.-C. Lin, C.-N. Peng, On improving interconnect defect diagnosis resolution and yield for interposer-based 3-D ICs. IEEE Des. Test 31(4), 16–26 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.-C. Chi, E.J. Marinissen, S.K. Goel, C.-W. Wu, Post-bond testing of 2.5D-SICs and 3D-SICs containing a passive silicon interposer base, in IEEE International Test Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.K. Goel, S. Adham, M.-J. Wang, J.-J. Chen, T.-C. Huang, A. Mehta, F. Lee, V. Chickermane, B. Keller, T. Valind, S. Mukherjee, N. Sood, J. Cho, H. Lee, J. Choi, S. Kim, Test and debug strategy for TSMC CoWoSTM stacking process based heterogeneous 3D IC: a silicon case study, in IEEE International Test Conference (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Wang, K. Chakrabarty, S. Bhawmik, Built-in self-test and test scheduling for interposer-based 2.5 D ICs. ACM Trans. Des. Autom. Electron. Syst. (TODAES) 20(4), 58 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    IEEE Std 1500TM-2005, IEEE standard testability method for embedded core-based integrated circuits, in IEEE Computer Society, IEEE, New York, NY, USA, Aug 2005Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Mitra, K.S. Kim, XPAND: an efficient test stimulus compression technique. IEEE Trans. Comput. 55(2), 163–173 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Krishna, N.A. Touba, Adjustable width linear combinational scan vector decompression, in IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, 2003, p. 863Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Koenemann, C. Barnhart, B. Keller, T. Snethen, O. Farnsworth, D. Wheater, A smartBIST variant with guaranteed encoding, in IEEE Asian Test Symposium, 2001, pp. 325–330Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Barnhart, V. Brunkhorst, F. Distler, O. Farnsworth, B. Keller, B. Koenemann, OPMISR: the foundation for compressed ATPG vectors, in IEEE International Test Conference, 2001, pp. 748–757Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Rajski, J. Tyszer, M. Kassab, N. Mukherjee, Embedded deterministic test. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Int. Circuits Syst. 23, 776–792 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.T. Wagner, Interconnect testing with boundary scan, in IEEE International Test Conference, 1987, pp. 52–57Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Fernau, J. Kneis, D. Kratsch, A. Langer, M. Liedloff, D. Raible, P. Rossmanith, An Exact Algorithm for the Maximum Leaf Spanning Tree Problem, in Parameterized and Exact Computation (Springer, Heidelberg, 2009), pp. 161–172Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nvidia (United States)SunnyvaleUSA
  2. 2.Department of ECEDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations