Skip to main content

Assessing Public Spending Efficiency in 20 OECD Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inequality and Finance in Macrodynamics

Part of the book series: Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance ((DMEF,volume 23))

Abstract

We follow the framework of Afonso et al. (Public Choice, 123(3–4):321–47, 2005), to look at the public expenditure of 20 OECD countries for the period 2009–2013, from an efficiency perspective. We construct Public Sector Performance and Public Sector Efficiency indicators and use Data Envelopment Analysis. The results show that the only country that performed on the efficiency frontier is Switzerland, Canada, Japan, Luxembourg and the United States are also more efficient performers. The average input-oriented efficiency score is equal to 0.732. That is, on average countries could have reduced the level of public expenditure by 26.8% and still achieved the same level of public performance. The average output-oriented efficiency score is 0.769 denoting that on average the sample countries could have increased their performance by 23.1% by employing the same level of public expenditure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afonso, A., & Fernandes, S. (2008). Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), 1946–1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afonso, A., & St. Aubyn, M. (2005). Non-parametric approaches to education and health efficiency in OECD countries. Journal of Applied Economics, VIII(2), 227–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2005). Public sector efficiency: an international comparison. Public Choice, 123(3–4), 321–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afonso, A., Romero, A., & Monsalve, E. (2013). Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence for Latin America. Inter-American Development Bank, 80478, Inter-American Development Bank. Department of Economics, ISEG-UL, Working Paper no. 19/2013/DE/UECE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, S., & Schaechter, A. (2008). The quality of public finances and economic growth. 337 European Commission, Economic and Financial Affairs Economic Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., ODonnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deroose, S., & Kastrop, C. (2008). The Quality of Public Finances: Findings of the Economic Policy Committee-Working Group (2004–2007). European Commission, Economic and Financial Affairs Economic Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, S., & Pang, G. (2005). Efficiency of Public Spending in Developing Countries: An Efficiency Frontier Approach. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandl, U., Dierx, A., & Ilzkovitz, F. (2008). The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Public Spending. European Commission, Economic and Financial Affairs Economic Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheubel, B. (2015). Public sector efficiency revisited the quality of public policy during the crisis and beyond. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Aubyn, M., Pina, A., Arcia, F., & Pais, J. (2009). Study on the efficiency and effectiveness of public spending on tertiary education. Economic Papers no. 390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, D., Robert, P., Joumard, I., & Nicq, C. (2007). Performance Indicators for Public Spending Efficiency in Primary and Secondary Education. OECD Economics Department, Working Paper 546.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

UECE is supported by the Fundacào para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology).We thank an anonymous referee and participants at the 2016 Public Sector Economics Conference organised by the Institute of Public Finance, Zagreb. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors’ employers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to António Afonso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32.

Fig. 16
figure 16

Detailed list of output components

Fig. 17
figure 17

Detailed list of input components (Expenditure Categories)

Fig. 18
figure 18

Public Expenditure (% of GDP) 2004–2013. Sources: The World Bank, European Commission (AMECO), OECD database, UIS Statistics

Fig. 19
figure 19

Public Sector Performance (PSP) Indicators excluding Switzerland, 2009–2013

Fig. 20
figure 20

DEA results (Model 3) 2009–2013 Model 3—1 Input (Normalized Government Consumption), 1 Output (Administration PSP scores)

Fig. 21
figure 21

DEA results (Model 4) 2009–2013 Model 4—1 Input (Normalized Education Expenditure), 1 Output (Education PSP scores)

Fig. 22
figure 22

DEA results (Model 5) 2009–2013 Model 5—1 Input (Normalized Health Expenditure), 1 Output (Health PSP scores)

Fig. 23
figure 23

DEA results (Model 6) 2009–2013 Model 6—1 Input (Public Investment), 1 Output (Infrastructure PSP scores)

Fig. 24
figure 24

DEA results (Model 2) excluding Switzerland 2009–2013 Model 2—1 Input (Normalized Total Spending), 2 Output (Opportunity and Musgravian PSP scores)

Fig. 25
figure 25

DEA results (Model 3) excluding Switzerland 2009–2013 Model 3—1 Input (Normalized Government Consumption), 1 Output (Administration PSP scores)

Fig. 26
figure 26

DEA results (Model 4) excluding Switzerland 2009–2013 Model 4—1 Input (Normalized Education Expenditure), 1 Output (Education PSP scores)

Fig. 27
figure 27

DEA results (Model 5) excluding Switzerland 2009–2013 Model 5—1 Input (Normalized Health Expenditure), 1 Output (Health PSP scores)

Fig. 28
figure 28

DEA results (Model 6) excluding Switzerland 2009–2013 Model 6—1 Input (Public Investment), 1 Output (Infrastructure PSP scores)

Fig. 29
figure 29

Public Sector Efficiency (PSE) Indicators excluding Switzerland, 2009–2013

Fig. 30
figure 30

Summary results of different DEA models excluding Switzerland

Fig. 31
figure 31

Production Possibility Frontier (Model 2)

Fig. 32
figure 32

Production Possibility Frontier (Model 2) excluding Switzerland

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Afonso, A., Kazemi, M. (2017). Assessing Public Spending Efficiency in 20 OECD Countries. In: Bökemeier, B., Greiner, A. (eds) Inequality and Finance in Macrodynamics. Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54690-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics