Skip to main content

Inequality in Germany and the US: An Introductory Note

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 834 Accesses

Part of the book series: Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance ((DMEF,volume 23))

Abstract

This introduction addresses various aspects of income and wealth inequality and their developments in Germany and the United States. In both countries the distribution of income and wealth has become more unequal during the past decades. We observe some changes in the figures especially for Germany indicating a more unequal situation at present. This holds for both, the income and the wealth inequality measures. Even though redistribution instruments reduce the Gini coefficient for the disposable income compared to the market outcome, there still is an almost steady increasing trend since the middle of the 1980s. Regarding wealth inequality, the ratio of mean to median net wealth reveals values above the OECD average for Germany and the United States. Both, income and wealth inequality are, however, more pronounced in the US.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is, however, a close pattern among wealth and income.

  2. 2.

    There are many ways for calculation and sources for Gini coefficients, see for instance World Bank (2014). Here, the data has been taken from OECD (2016a) for comparison.

  3. 3.

    About 60% for the 30 years from 1976 to 2007, cf. Atkinson et al. (2011, p8f.).

  4. 4.

    Piketty and Zucman (2014, p.17) especially look at France, Britain an Sweden, but argue that the pattern is rather typical for Europe.

  5. 5.

    All wealth data has been taken from OECD (2016b). All values refer to the most recent available data (2010) and current prices of national currency (GER= €, USA= US$).

References

  • Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), 3–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behringer, J., Theobald, T., & van Treeck, T. (2016). Ungleichheit und makroökonomische Instabilität: Eine Bestandsaufnahme (pp. 1–36). Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, available online: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/wiso/12690.pdf, last access: October 5, 2016.

  • Fratzscher, M. (2016). Verteilungskampf: Warum Deutschland immer ungleicher wird. München: Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1953). Shares of upper income groups in income and savings (Vol. 55). New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtin, F., & d’Ercole, M. (2015). Household wealth inequality across OECD countries: New OECD evidence. OECD Statistics Brief No. 21, June 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011a). Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011b). Inequality: Why the struggle matters. OECD Observer No. 287 Q4.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2016a). OECD.stat, Social protection and well-being. Income distribution and poverty. http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=66670#, last access: September 13, 2016.

  • OECD (2016b). OECD.stat, Social protection and well-being. Wealth distribution. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=WEALTH, last access: September 8, 2016.

  • Ostry, J. D., Berg, A., & Tsangarides, C. G. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth (pp. 1–36). IMF Staff Dicussion Note SDB/14/02, available online: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/sdn1402.pdf, last access: October 11, 2016.

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2003). Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T., & Zucman, G. (2014). Wealth and inheritance in the long run. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP10072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, E. N., & Zacharias, A. (2009). Household wealth and the measurement of economic well-being in the United States. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 7(2), 83–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2014). All the Ginis, 1950–2012 (updated in autumn 2014) by Branko L. Milanovic. http://go.worldbank.org/9VCQW66LA0. Last access: 5 Sept 2016

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Christina Anselmann, Alfred Greiner and Silvia Melzer for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bettina Bökemeier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bökemeier, B. (2017). Inequality in Germany and the US: An Introductory Note. In: Bökemeier, B., Greiner, A. (eds) Inequality and Finance in Macrodynamics. Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54690-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics