Abstract
How does increasing government accountability to its citizens increase policy capacity? In this chapter, we build on the strategic interaction approach to provide a theoretical framework of government’s credible accountability that increases policy capacity. Importantly, the government’s credible accountability rests on its commitment to specific processes that embody transparency, accountability, and responsiveness that are independent of democratic progress. Drawing on evidence from East and Southeast Asia—specifically, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and Malaysia—during the 1997–1998 Asian Financial Crisis, we show how each government’s demonstration or failure to demonstrate credible accountability affected its policy capacity. This chapter makes three contributions to the literature. First, it provides a theoretical framework for building policy capacity through the government’s credible accountability. This departs from prevailing economic-growth explanations of policy capacity in East and Southeast Asia. Second, this evidence maps citizens’ quiescence to government accountability rather than citizens’ passiveness or ignorance; thus, the model treats citizens as active and strategic. Third, the increased policy capacity reveals an overlooked process that increases government accountability without compromising the government’s policy reach or absorbing its resources.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ames, B. (1987). Political survival: Politicians and public policy in Latin America. In R. Bates, B. Barry, & S. Popkin (Eds.), California series on social choice and political economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Aziz, T. A. (1999). Malaysia incorporated: Ethics on trial. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 58(4), 19–25.
Asia Pulse. (1998). Various issues. Sydney, Australia.
Annual Budget Statement. (1998). Policy stance/adjustments. Singapore: Ministry of Finance.
Bates, R. (1981). Markets and states in tropical Africa. In B. Barry & S. Popkin (Eds.), California series on social choice and political economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bates, R., Greif, A., Rosenthal, J.-L., Levi, M., & Weingast, B. R. (1998). Analytic narratives. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Berg, A. (1999). The Asia crisis: Causes, policy responses, and outcomes. International Monetary Fund Working Paper.
Board of Foreign Trade Annual Report. (1999). Taipei, Taiwan.
Business Times. Various issues. Singapore.
Cabestan, J. P. (1999). Taiwan in 1998: An auspicious year for the Kuomintang. Asian Survey, 39, 140–147.
Chao, L., Myers, R. H., & Robinson, J. A. (1997). Promoting effective democracy, Chinese style: Taiwan’s national development conference. Asian Survey, 37, 669–682.
Courier Mail. (1996). Various issues. Brisbane, Australia.
Chosun Ilbo. (1997/1998). Various issues. Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Daugbjerg, C., & Halpin, D. (2010). Generating policy capacity in emerging green industries: The development of organic farming in Denmark and Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12(2), 141–157.
DeLeon, P. (1995). Democratic values and the policy sciences. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 886–905.
Department of Statistics. (2002). (Singapore) Retrieved November 19, 2003, from http://www.singstat.gov.sg.
Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics. (2003). Achievements and Prospects. Retrieved June 3, 2012, from http://www.dgbasey.gov.tw.
Deutsche Presse-Agentur. (1998). Various issues. Hamburg, Germany.
East Asia Barometer. (2001/2002). Retrieved May 6, 2014, from http://www.globalbarometer.org.
Economic Planning Unit. (2001a). White paper: Status of the economy. Malaysia: Economic Planning Unit. Retrieved September 19, 2016, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan003367.pdf.
Economic Planning Unit. (2001b). Economy in figures. Malaysia: Economic Planning Unit.
Financial Times. (1996/1997). Various issues. London, United Kingdom.
Free China Journal. (1995–1997). Various issues. Taipei, Taiwan.
Free Malaysia Press. (1999). Various issues. Malaysia, defunct. Retrieved February 15, 2001.
Guo, G. (2007). Retrospective economic accountability under authoritarianism: Evidence from China. Political Research Quarterly, 60(3), 378–390.
Haggard, S. (2013). Regional responses to financial crises: The Americas, East Asia, and Europe. In R. Changyong & P. Adam (Eds.), Responding to financial crisis: Lessons from Asia then, the United States and Europe now. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
Inter Press Service. (1996/1997). Various issues. Rome, Italy.
Jackman, R. W., & Miller, R. A. (1996). A renaissance of political culture? American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 632–659.
Korea Focus. (1997/1998). Various issues. Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Lee, E. W. Y., & Haque, S. M. (2006). The new public management reform and governance in Asian NICS: A comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore. Governance, 19(4), 605–626. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2006.00330.x.
Mason, T. D., & Clements, J. (2002). Tiananmen square thirteen years after: The prospects for civil unrest in China. Asian Affairs no., 29(3), 159–188.
Nesadurai, H. (2000). In defense of national economic autonomy? Malaysia’s response to the financial crisis. The Pacific Review, 13, 73–114.
New York Times. (1996/1999). Various issues. New York, New York.
Off-budget Statement. (1998). Conclusion. Singapore: Ministry of Finance.
Radelet, S., & Sachs, J. (1998). The East Asian financial crisis: Diagnosis, remedies, prospects. Brookings Paper on Economic Activity, 1–90.
Rana, P., & Lim, J. A. Y. (2000). The East Asian crisis: Macroeconomic policy design and sequencing issues. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank.
Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238.
Park, D., Ramayandi, A., & Shin, K. (2013). Why did Asian countries fare better during the global financial crisis than during the Asian financial crisis? In R. Changyong & P. Adam (Eds.), Responding to financial crisis: Lessons from Asia then, the United States and Europe now. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
Polidano, C. (2000). Measuring public sector capacity. World Development, 28(5), 805–822.
Report of the CSC Sub-committee on Domestic Businesses. (1998). (Singapore).
Report of the CSC Subcommittee on Manpower and Productivity. (1998). (Singapore).
Republic of China Yearbook. (1997–2000). Taipei, Taiwan.
Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
The Straits Times. (1998/1999). Various issues. Singapore.
Taiwan Communiqué. (1998). Various issues.
To, L. T. (1999). Singapore in 1998: The most serious challenge since independence. Asian Survey, 38, 72–79.
Wagle, U. (2000). The policy science of democracy: The issues of methodology and citizen participation. Policy Sciences, 33, 207–223.
Washington Times. (1998). Various issues. Washington, DC.
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2014). Blending skills and resources: A matrix model of policy capacities. Paper presented at the LKY-Zhejiang workshop on policy capacity.
Xinhua News Agency. (1997/1998). Various issues. People’s Republic of China.
Yap, O. F. (2003). Malaysia. In H. Patrick & L. Monique (Eds.), The Southeast Asia handbook. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers.
Yap, O. F. (2012). A strategic model of economic performance and democratization in South Korea and Taiwan. British Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 213–239.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yap, O.F. (2018). Government’s Credible Accountability and Strategic Policy Capacity: Evidence from the Asian NICs of Taiwan, South Korea, Malaysia, and Singapore. In: Wu, X., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. (eds) Policy Capacity and Governance. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54675-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54675-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54674-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54675-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)