Abstract
While the conceptualization of policy capacity and its application to governance performance have been addressed in the academic literature, existing governance indices appear not to consider policy capacity in its many nuanced forms. This shortcoming may be perpetuating incomplete accounts of governance quality within a diverse and growing group of indices. This chapter surveys five commonly used indices to determine whether and how they measure policy capacity. Two of the indices, the Worldwide Governance Indicators and KPMG Change Readiness Index , address broad measures of governance in a globally comparative context. The remaining indices—the Sustainable Governance Indicators , Global Innovation Policy Index , and Bertelsmann Transformation Index —target particular dimensions of governance. This chapter argues that policy capacity is relevant across many types of indices, and therefore deserves closer attention. In particular, the chapter illustrates how a robust framework measuring policy capacity, proposed by Xun, Ramesh, and Howlett, can be used to identify areas in which governance indices inadequately account for capacity. This chapter is in three parts. After a brief introduction, the first part tabulates measures of capacity within selected indices using elements of the framework as an analytical template. The second part compares tabulation results across all five indices, and the final part advocates a more robust consideration of capacity based on the identified shortcomings of the observed indices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Apter, D. E. (1955). British West Africa: Patterns of self-government. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 298(1), 117–129. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/000271625529800113?journalCode=anna.
Atkinson, R. D., Ezell, S., & Stewart, L. A. (2012). Global innovation policy index, the information technology & innovation foundation. Retrieved from http://www.itif.org/publications/global-innovation-policy-index.
Bertelesmann-Stiftung. (2014). SGI 2014. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from http://www.sgi-network.org/2014/.
Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2008). Good enough governance in fragile states: The role of center-periphery relations and local government. In 4th International Specialised Conference on International Aid and Public Administration (pp. 23–27). Ankara: International Institute of Administrative Sciences.
Grindle, M. S. (2002). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548.
Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 25(5), 553–574.
Hope, K. R. (2009). Capacity development for good governance in developing societies: Lessons from the field. Development in Practice, 19(1), 79–86.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2014, April 5). The Achilles heel of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures (Working Paper No. LKYSPP14–03). Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. Working Paper Series.
Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2003). The impact of collaborative planning on governance capacity. Institute of Urban and Regional Development. Working Chapter.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M.. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.
Larmour, P. (2005). Foreign flowers: Institutional transfer and good governance in the Pacific Islands. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Maurseth, P. B. (2008). Governance indicators: A guided tour (No. 754). NUPI Working Chapter.
Stiftung, B. (2014). Bertelsmann transformation index 2014. In Politische Gestaltung im internationalen Vergleich. GĂĽtersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Thomas, M. A. (2010). What do the worldwide governance indicators measure. European Journal of Development Research, 22(1), 31–54.
World Bank. (2013). WGI 2013 interactive > documentation. Retrieved from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#doc.
Xun, W., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2014). Blending skills and resources: A matrix model of policy capacities. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy-Zhejiang University Workshop on Policy Capacity, May 22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Abbreviations
- ADB:
-
African Development Bank Country Policy and Institutional Assessments
- AFR:
-
Afrobarometer
- ASD:
-
Asian Development Bank Country Policy and Institutional Assessments
- BTI:
-
Bertelsmann Transformation Index
- CCR/FNT:
-
Freedom House
- EIU:
-
Economist Intelligence Unit
- FSI:
-
Failed States Index
- GCS:
-
Global Competitiveness Report
- GE:
-
Government Effectiveness
- GII:
-
Global Integrity Index
- GWP:
-
Gallup World Poll
- IEF:
-
Index of Economic Freedom
- IFD:
-
IFAD Rural Sector Performance Assessments
- ILO:
-
International Labour Organization
- IMF:
-
International Monetary Fund
- IPD:
-
Institutional Profiles Database
- LBO:
-
Latinobarometro
- OE:
-
Oxford Economics
- PIA:
-
World Bank Country Policy and Institutional Assessments
- PRS:
-
Political Risk Services International Country Risk Guide
- RL:
-
Rule of Law
- SGI:
-
Sustainable Governance Indicators
- UNCTAD:
-
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
- UNDP:
-
United Nations Development Programme
- UNESCO:
-
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
- UN HDI/A:
-
United Nations Human Development Index
- V&A:
-
Voice and Accountability (WGI)
- VAB:
-
Vanderbilt University’s Americas Barometer
- WB:
-
World Bank
- WB DB:
-
World Bank Doing Business Index
- WCY:
-
Institute for Management and Development World Competitiveness Yearbook
- WEF:
-
World Economic Forum
- WEF GCI:
-
World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Index
- WGI:
-
World Governance Indicators
- WMO:
-
Global Insight Business Condition and Risk Indicators
1.2 Indices
WGI
Organizational information capacities | |
---|---|
Matrix | WGI (measure; data source) |
Storing and disseminating information on client need | Â |
Service utilization | Â |
Budgeting, human resource management, e-services | Reliability of basic economic and financial statistics (e.g. national accounts, price indices, foreign trade, currency and credit, etc.) (V&A; IPD) Reliability of State-owned banks’ accounts (V&A; IPD) Quality of budgetary and financial management (GE; ADB, ASD and PIA) |
Administrative resource capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | WGI |
Funding, staffing | Quality of bureaucracy/institutional effectiveness (GE; EIU) Bureaucratic quality (GE; PRS) Quality of the country’s bureaucracy (GE; WMO) Policy consistency and forward planning (GE; WMO) Quality of public administration (GE; ADB, ASD, and PIA) Efficiency of revenue mobilization (GE; ADB, ASD, and PIA) Resource Efficiency (GE; BTI) Policy direction is not consistent (GE; WCY) |
Levels of intra- and inter-agency communication, consultation, and coordination | Dialogue between government and rural organizations (V&A; IFD) |
Accountability and responsibility system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | WGI |
Presence of rule of law | Do the representative Institutions (e.g. parliament) operate in accordance with the formal rules in force (e.g. Constitution)? (V&A; IPD) Enforceability of contracts (RL; EIU) Speediness of judicial process (RL; EIU) Property rights and rule based governance (RL: ASD) Rule of Law (RL; CCR/FNT) Judicial framework and independence (RL; CCR/FNT) Judicial Accountability (RL; GII) Rule of Law (RL; GII) Law Enforcement (RL; GII) |
Transparent adjudicative and career systems | Transparency of government policymaking (V&A; GCS) Is the State economic policy (e.g. budgetary, fiscal, etc.)… communicated? (V&A; IPD) Is the State economic policy (e.g. budgetary, fiscal, etc.)… publicly debated? (V&A; IPD) Degree of transparency in public procurement (V&A; IPD) |
Organizational political capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | WGI |
Effective civil service bargain | The public service is not independent from political interference (GE; WCY) Judicial Independence (RL; GCS) Independent Judiciary (RL; BTI) |
Politicians’ support for the agency programs and projects |  |
Levels of inter-organizational trust and communication | Consensus Building (GE; BTI) |
Political-economic system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | WGI |
Presence of public legitimacy and trust | Accountability of public officials (V&A; EIU) Transparency of government policymaking (V&A; GCS) Democratic accountability (V&A; PRS) Institutional permanence: An assessment of how mature and well-established the political system is (V&A; WMO) Representativeness: How well the population and organized interests can make their voices heard in the political system (V&A; WMO) How much do you trust the parliament? (V&A; AFR) Election Integrity (V&A; GII) Trust in Parliament (V&A; LBO and VAB) Trust in Government (GE; LBO) Trust in Judiciary (RL; LBO) Trust in supreme court (RL; VAB) Trust in justice system (RL; VAB) Confidence in honesty of elections (V&A; GWP) |
Adequate fiscal system to fund programs and projects | Reliability of State budget (completeness, credibility, performance…) (V&A; IPD) Reliability of State accounts (completeness, audit, review law…) (V&A; IPD) |
Access to information | Public Access to Information (V&A; GII) |
SGI
Policy analytical capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | SGI |
Knowledge of policy substance | Government office expertise (16.67% of interministerial coordination sub-index) |
Analytical techniques and communication skills | Â |
Organizational information capacities | |
---|---|
Matrix | SGI |
Storing and disseminating information on client need | Government office gatekeeping and ability to “return items” for policy consideration (16.67% of interministerial coordination sub-index) Quality of regulatory impact assessment process (33.3% of evidence-based instruments sub-index) Inclusion of sustainability checks in regulatory impact assessments (33.3% of evidence-based instruments sub-index) |
Service utilization | Â |
Budgeting, human resource management, e-services | Â |
Knowledge system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | SGI |
Presence of high quality educational and training institutions | Education policy (50% of education sub-index) Upper secondary attainment (10%) Tertiary attainment (10%) |
Opportunities for knowledge generation, mobilization and use | Decision-making backed by strategic planning (50% of strategic capacity sub-index) Decision-making backed by scholarly advice (50%) Adaptability of domestic government structures to external developments (50% of adaptability sub-index) Institutional reform in strategic capacity (50% of organizational reform sub-index) |
Managerial expertise capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | SGI |
Strategic management | Self-monitoring by actors about appropriateness of institutional arrangements (50% of organizational reform sub-index) |
Leadership, communication, negotiation and conflict resolution | Coherent communication about ministry activity and policy plans (100% of policy communication sub-index) |
Financial management and budgeting | Â |
Administrative resource capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | SGI |
Funding, staffing | Government efficiency (14.29% of implementation sub-index) Adequate task-related funding delegated by central government (14.29%) |
Levels of intra- and inter-agency communication, consultation, and coordination | Line ministry involvement of government offices in policy proposals (16.67% of interministerial coordination sub-index) Effectiveness of coordination between ministries and civil servants in policy proposals (16.67%) Constitutional discretion for sub-national governments (14.29% of implementation sub-index) Sub-national governments held to national standards of public services (14.29%) International coordination (50% of adaptability sub-index) |
Accountability and responsibility system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | SGI |
Presence of rule of law | Legal Certainty (25% of rule of law sub-index) Judicial Review (25%) Appointment of Justices (25%) Corruption Prevention (25%) |
Transparent adjudicative and career systems | Â |
Political acumen‎ capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | SGI |
Understanding of the needs and positions of different stakeholders | Â |
Judgment of political feasibility | Application of regulatory impact assessment (33.3% of evidence-based instruments sub-index) |
Communication skills | Â |
Organizational political capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | SGI |
Effective civil service bargain | Monitoring of ministries for effective implementation (14.29% of implementation sub-index) Monitoring of agencies and bureaucracies for effective implementation (14.29%) |
Politicians’ support for the agency programs and projects | Ministerial compliance and presence of incentives for ministers to implement programs (14.29% of implementation sub-index) |
Levels of inter-organizational trust and communication | Informal coordination among government organizations (16.67% of interministerial coordination sub-index) |
Political-economic system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | SGI |
Presence of public legitimacy and trust | Popular decision-making (20% of electoral processes sub-index) Civil Rights (33.33% of civil rights and political liberties sub-index) Political Liberties (33.33%) Non-discrimination (33.33%) Societal consultation (100% of societal consultation sub-index) |
Adequate fiscal system to fund programs and projects | Â |
Access to information | Media access (20% of electoral processes sub-index) Media Freedom (33.33% of access to information sub-index) Media Pluralism (33.33%) Access to Government Information (33.33%) |
GIPI
Knowledge system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | GIPI |
Presence of high quality educational and training institutions | Higher education R&D performance (30% of science and R&D policy indicators sub-index; UNESCO) |
Opportunities for knowledge generation, mobilization and use | Â |
Accountability and responsibility system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | GIPI |
Presence of rule of law | Contract enforcement (10% of domestic market competition and entrepreneurship indicators; World Bank) Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (5%) Integrity of legal system (15% of intellectual property rights sub-index; WEF) Legal environment (10% of digital policy indicators sub-index) Corruption perceptions index (20% of government procurement policy sub-index; Transparency International) |
Transparent adjudicative and career systems | Â |
CRI
Knowledge system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | CRI |
Presence of high quality educational and training institutions | Quality of Education (WEF GCI) Secondary Enrolment Rate (WB) Tertiary Enrolment Rate (WB) Availability of Research and Training Facilities (WEF GCI) Extent of Staff Training (WEF GCI) |
Opportunities for knowledge generation, mobilization and use | Â |
Managerial expertise capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | CRI |
Strategic management | Quality of Management Schools (WEF GCI) |
Leadership, communication, negotiation and conflict resolution | Â |
Financial management and budgeting | Quality of Math and Science Education (WEF GCI) |
Organizational information capacities | |
---|---|
Matrix | CRI |
Storing and disseminating information on client need | Â |
Service utilization | Civil Service (FSI) |
Budgeting, human resource management, e-services | Â |
Administrative resource capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | CRI |
Funding, staffing | Wastefulness of Government Spending (WEF GCI) |
Levels of intra- and inter-agency communication, consultation, and coordination. | Hybrid (Time to Deal With Construction Permits (WBDB) Cost to Deal With Construction Permits (WBDB)) Government Services for Improved Business Performance (WEF GCI) |
Accountability and responsibility system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | CRI |
Presence of rule of law | Rule of Law Index (WB) Business Costs of Crime and Violence (WEF GCI) Business Costs of Terrorism (WEF GCI) Business Costs of Organized Crime (WEF GCI) Rule of Law Metric (FSI) Regulatory Quality Index (WB) Efficiency of Legal Framework in Settling Disputes (WEF GCI) Efficiency of Legal Framework in Challenging Regulations (WEF GCI) |
Transparent adjudicative and career systems | Transparency of Government Policymaking (WEF GCI) Corruption Index (WB) |
Political-economic system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | CRI |
Presence of public legitimacy and trust | State Legitimacy (FSI) Voice and Accountability (WB) Freedom of Expression and Belief (FSI) |
Adequate fiscal system to fund programs and projects | Government Budget Balance (% GDP) (OE) Gross Government Debt (% of GDP) (IMF) Resource mobilization |
Access to information | Press Freedom Index (Reporters Without Borders) |
BTI
Administrative resource capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | BTI |
Funding, staffing | Â |
Levels of intra- and inter-agency communication, consultation, and coordination. | Civil society traditions Conflict intensity Policy coordination Cleavage/conflict management Civil society participation |
Accountability and responsibility system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | BTI |
Presence of rule of law | Monopoly on the use of force No interference of religious dogmas Basic administration Separation of powers Independent judiciary Prosecution of office abuse Civil rights |
Transparent adjudicative and career systems | Free and fair elections Anti-corruption policy |
Knowledge system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | BTI |
Presence of high quality educational and training institutions | Â |
Opportunities for knowledge generation, mobilization and use | Policy learning |
Managerial expertise capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | BTI |
Strategic management | Â |
Leadership, communication, negotiation and conflict resolution | Â |
Financial management and budgeting | Efficient use of assets |
Organizational political capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | BTI |
Effective civil service bargain | Effective power to govern |
Politicians’ support for the agency programs and projects | Structural constraints |
Levels of inter-organizational trust and communication | Reconciliation |
Political acumen‎ capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | BTI |
Understanding of the needs and positions of different stakeholders | Â |
Judgment of political feasibility | Prioritization Consensus on goals |
Communication skills | Â |
Political-economic system capacity | |
---|---|
Matrix | BTI |
Presence of public legitimacy and trust | Agreement about citizenship and acceptance of the nation-state as legitimate Performance of democratic institutions Commitment to democratic institutions |
Adequate fiscal system to fund programs and projects | Â |
Access to information | Â |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hartley, K., Zhang, J. (2018). Measuring Policy Capacity Through Governance Indices. In: Wu, X., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. (eds) Policy Capacity and Governance. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54675-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54675-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54674-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54675-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)