Skip to main content

Measuring Policy Capacity Through Governance Indices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Policy Capacity and Governance

Part of the book series: Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy ((PEPP))

Abstract

While the conceptualization of policy capacity and its application to governance performance have been addressed in the academic literature, existing governance indices appear not to consider policy capacity in its many nuanced forms. This shortcoming may be perpetuating incomplete accounts of governance quality within a diverse and growing group of indices. This chapter surveys five commonly used indices to determine whether and how they measure policy capacity. Two of the indices, the Worldwide Governance Indicators and KPMG Change Readiness Index , address broad measures of governance in a globally comparative context. The remaining indices—the Sustainable Governance Indicators , Global Innovation Policy Index , and Bertelsmann Transformation Index —target particular dimensions of governance. This chapter argues that policy capacity is relevant across many types of indices, and therefore deserves closer attention. In particular, the chapter illustrates how a robust framework measuring policy capacity, proposed by Xun, Ramesh, and Howlett, can be used to identify areas in which governance indices inadequately account for capacity. This chapter is in three parts. After a brief introduction, the first part tabulates measures of capacity within selected indices using elements of the framework as an analytical template. The second part compares tabulation results across all five indices, and the final part advocates a more robust consideration of capacity based on the identified shortcomings of the observed indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apter, D. E. (1955). British West Africa: Patterns of self-government. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 298(1), 117–129. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/000271625529800113?journalCode=anna.

  • Atkinson, R. D., Ezell, S., & Stewart, L. A. (2012). Global innovation policy index, the information technology & innovation foundation. Retrieved from http://www.itif.org/publications/global-innovation-policy-index.

  • Bertelesmann-Stiftung. (2014). SGI 2014. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from http://www.sgi-network.org/2014/.

  • Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2008). Good enough governance in fragile states: The role of center-periphery relations and local government. In 4th International Specialised Conference on International Aid and Public Administration (pp. 23–27). Ankara: International Institute of Administrative Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. S. (2002). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 25(5), 553–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, K. R. (2009). Capacity development for good governance in developing societies: Lessons from the field. Development in Practice, 19(1), 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2014, April 5). The Achilles heel of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures (Working Paper No. LKYSPP14–03). Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. Working Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2003). The impact of collaborative planning on governance capacity. Institute of Urban and Regional Development. Working Chapter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M.. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larmour, P. (2005). Foreign flowers: Institutional transfer and good governance in the Pacific Islands. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurseth, P. B. (2008). Governance indicators: A guided tour (No. 754). NUPI Working Chapter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiftung, B. (2014). Bertelsmann transformation index 2014. In Politische Gestaltung im internationalen Vergleich. GĂĽtersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. A. (2010). What do the worldwide governance indicators measure. European Journal of Development Research, 22(1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2013). WGI 2013 interactive > documentation. Retrieved from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#doc.

  • Xun, W., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2014). Blending skills and resources: A matrix model of policy capacities. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy-Zhejiang University Workshop on Policy Capacity, May 22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kris Hartley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Abbreviations

ADB:

African Development Bank Country Policy and Institutional Assessments

AFR:

Afrobarometer

ASD:

Asian Development Bank Country Policy and Institutional Assessments

BTI:

Bertelsmann Transformation Index

CCR/FNT:

Freedom House

EIU:

Economist Intelligence Unit

FSI:

Failed States Index

GCS:

Global Competitiveness Report

GE:

Government Effectiveness

GII:

Global Integrity Index

GWP:

Gallup World Poll

IEF:

Index of Economic Freedom

IFD:

IFAD Rural Sector Performance Assessments

ILO:

International Labour Organization

IMF:

International Monetary Fund

IPD:

Institutional Profiles Database

LBO:

Latinobarometro

OE:

Oxford Economics

PIA:

World Bank Country Policy and Institutional Assessments

PRS:

Political Risk Services International Country Risk Guide

RL:

Rule of Law

SGI:

Sustainable Governance Indicators

UNCTAD:

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

UNDP:

United Nations Development Programme

UNESCO:

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

UN HDI/A:

United Nations Human Development Index

V&A:

Voice and Accountability (WGI)

VAB:

Vanderbilt University’s Americas Barometer

WB:

World Bank

WB DB:

World Bank Doing Business Index

WCY:

Institute for Management and Development World Competitiveness Yearbook

WEF:

World Economic Forum

WEF GCI:

World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Index

WGI:

World Governance Indicators

WMO:

Global Insight Business Condition and Risk Indicators

1.2 Indices

WGI

Organizational information capacities

Matrix

WGI (measure; data source)

Storing and disseminating information on client need

 

Service utilization

 

Budgeting, human resource management, e-services

Reliability of basic economic and financial statistics (e.g. national accounts, price indices, foreign trade, currency and credit, etc.) (V&A; IPD)

Reliability of State-owned banks’ accounts (V&A; IPD)

Quality of budgetary and financial management (GE; ADB, ASD and PIA)

Administrative resource capacity

Matrix

WGI

Funding, staffing

Quality of bureaucracy/institutional effectiveness (GE; EIU)

Bureaucratic quality (GE; PRS)

Quality of the country’s bureaucracy (GE; WMO)

Policy consistency and forward planning (GE; WMO)

Quality of public administration (GE; ADB, ASD, and PIA)

Efficiency of revenue mobilization (GE; ADB, ASD, and PIA)

Resource Efficiency (GE; BTI)

Policy direction is not consistent (GE; WCY)

Levels of intra- and inter-agency communication, consultation, and coordination

Dialogue between government and rural organizations (V&A; IFD)

Accountability and responsibility system capacity

Matrix

WGI

Presence of rule of law

Do the representative Institutions (e.g. parliament) operate in accordance with the formal rules in force (e.g. Constitution)? (V&A; IPD)

Enforceability of contracts (RL; EIU)

Speediness of judicial process (RL; EIU)

Property rights and rule based governance (RL: ASD)

Rule of Law (RL; CCR/FNT)

Judicial framework and independence (RL; CCR/FNT)

Judicial Accountability (RL; GII)

Rule of Law (RL; GII)

Law Enforcement (RL; GII)

Transparent adjudicative and career systems

Transparency of government policymaking (V&A; GCS)

Is the State economic policy (e.g. budgetary, fiscal, etc.)… communicated? (V&A; IPD)

Is the State economic policy (e.g. budgetary, fiscal, etc.)… publicly debated? (V&A; IPD)

Degree of transparency in public procurement (V&A; IPD)

Organizational political capacity

Matrix

WGI

Effective civil service bargain

The public service is not independent from political interference (GE; WCY)

Judicial Independence (RL; GCS)

Independent Judiciary (RL; BTI)

Politicians’ support for the agency programs and projects

 

Levels of inter-organizational trust and communication

Consensus Building (GE; BTI)

Political-economic system capacity

Matrix

WGI

Presence of public legitimacy and trust

Accountability of public officials (V&A; EIU)

Transparency of government policymaking (V&A; GCS)

Democratic accountability (V&A; PRS)

Institutional permanence: An assessment of how mature and well-established the political system is (V&A; WMO)

Representativeness: How well the population and organized interests can make their voices heard in the political system (V&A; WMO)

How much do you trust the parliament? (V&A; AFR)

Election Integrity (V&A; GII)

Trust in Parliament (V&A; LBO and VAB)

Trust in Government (GE; LBO)

Trust in Judiciary (RL; LBO)

Trust in supreme court (RL; VAB)

Trust in justice system (RL; VAB)

Confidence in honesty of elections (V&A; GWP)

Adequate fiscal system to fund programs and projects

Reliability of State budget (completeness, credibility, performance…) (V&A; IPD)

Reliability of State accounts (completeness, audit, review law…) (V&A; IPD)

Access to information

Public Access to Information (V&A; GII)

SGI

Policy analytical capacity

Matrix

SGI

Knowledge of policy substance

Government office expertise (16.67% of interministerial coordination sub-index)

Analytical techniques and communication skills

 

Organizational information capacities

Matrix

SGI

Storing and disseminating information on client need

Government office gatekeeping and ability to “return items” for policy consideration (16.67% of interministerial coordination sub-index)

Quality of regulatory impact assessment process (33.3% of evidence-based instruments sub-index)

Inclusion of sustainability checks in regulatory impact assessments (33.3% of evidence-based instruments sub-index)

Service utilization

 

Budgeting, human resource management, e-services

 

Knowledge system capacity

Matrix

SGI

Presence of high quality educational and training institutions

Education policy (50% of education sub-index)

Upper secondary attainment (10%)

Tertiary attainment (10%)

Opportunities for knowledge generation, mobilization and use

Decision-making backed by strategic planning (50% of strategic capacity sub-index)

Decision-making backed by scholarly advice (50%)

Adaptability of domestic government structures to external developments (50% of adaptability sub-index)

Institutional reform in strategic capacity (50% of organizational reform sub-index)

Managerial expertise capacity

Matrix

SGI

Strategic management

Self-monitoring by actors about appropriateness of institutional arrangements (50% of organizational reform sub-index)

Leadership, communication, negotiation and conflict resolution

Coherent communication about ministry activity and policy plans (100% of policy communication sub-index)

Financial management and budgeting

 

Administrative resource capacity

Matrix

SGI

Funding, staffing

Government efficiency (14.29% of implementation sub-index)

Adequate task-related funding delegated by central government (14.29%)

Levels of intra- and inter-agency communication, consultation, and coordination

Line ministry involvement of government offices in policy proposals (16.67% of interministerial coordination sub-index)

Effectiveness of coordination between ministries and civil servants in policy proposals (16.67%)

Constitutional discretion for sub-national governments (14.29% of implementation sub-index)

Sub-national governments held to national standards of public services (14.29%)

International coordination (50% of adaptability sub-index)

Accountability and responsibility system capacity

Matrix

SGI

Presence of rule of law

Legal Certainty (25% of rule of law sub-index)

Judicial Review (25%)

Appointment of Justices (25%)

Corruption Prevention (25%)

Transparent adjudicative and career systems

 

Political acumen‎ capacity

Matrix

SGI

Understanding of the needs and positions of different stakeholders

 

Judgment of political feasibility

Application of regulatory impact assessment (33.3% of evidence-based instruments sub-index)

Communication skills

 

Organizational political capacity

Matrix

SGI

Effective civil service bargain

Monitoring of ministries for effective implementation (14.29% of implementation sub-index)

Monitoring of agencies and bureaucracies for effective implementation (14.29%)

Politicians’ support for the agency programs and projects

Ministerial compliance and presence of incentives for ministers to implement programs (14.29% of implementation sub-index)

Levels of inter-organizational trust and communication

Informal coordination among government organizations (16.67% of interministerial coordination sub-index)

Political-economic system capacity

Matrix

SGI

Presence of public legitimacy and trust

Popular decision-making (20% of electoral processes sub-index)

Civil Rights (33.33% of civil rights and political liberties sub-index)

Political Liberties (33.33%)

Non-discrimination (33.33%)

Societal consultation (100% of societal consultation sub-index)

Adequate fiscal system to fund programs and projects

 

Access to information

Media access (20% of electoral processes sub-index)

Media Freedom (33.33% of access to information sub-index)

Media Pluralism (33.33%)

Access to Government Information (33.33%)

GIPI

Knowledge system capacity

Matrix

GIPI

Presence of high quality educational and training institutions

Higher education R&D performance (30% of science and R&D policy indicators sub-index; UNESCO)

Opportunities for knowledge generation, mobilization and use

 

Accountability and responsibility system capacity

Matrix

GIPI

Presence of rule of law

Contract enforcement (10% of domestic market competition and entrepreneurship indicators; World Bank)

Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (5%)

Integrity of legal system (15% of intellectual property rights sub-index; WEF)

Legal environment (10% of digital policy indicators sub-index)

Corruption perceptions index (20% of government procurement policy sub-index; Transparency International)

Transparent adjudicative and career systems

 

CRI

Knowledge system capacity

Matrix

CRI

Presence of high quality educational and training institutions

Quality of Education (WEF GCI)

Secondary Enrolment Rate (WB)

Tertiary Enrolment Rate (WB)

Availability of Research and Training Facilities (WEF GCI)

Extent of Staff Training (WEF GCI)

Opportunities for knowledge generation, mobilization and use

 

Managerial expertise capacity

Matrix

CRI

Strategic management

Quality of Management Schools (WEF GCI)

Leadership, communication, negotiation and conflict resolution

 

Financial management and budgeting

Quality of Math and Science Education (WEF GCI)

Organizational information capacities

Matrix

CRI

Storing and disseminating information on client need

 

Service utilization

Civil Service (FSI)

Budgeting, human resource management, e-services

 

Administrative resource capacity

Matrix

CRI

Funding, staffing

Wastefulness of Government Spending (WEF GCI)

Levels of intra- and inter-agency communication, consultation, and coordination.

Hybrid (Time to Deal With Construction Permits (WBDB)

Cost to Deal With Construction Permits (WBDB))

Government Services for Improved Business Performance (WEF GCI)

Accountability and responsibility system capacity

Matrix

CRI

Presence of rule of law

Rule of Law Index (WB)

Business Costs of Crime and Violence (WEF GCI)

Business Costs of Terrorism (WEF GCI)

Business Costs of Organized Crime (WEF GCI)

Rule of Law Metric (FSI)

Regulatory Quality Index (WB)

Efficiency of Legal Framework in Settling Disputes (WEF GCI)

Efficiency of Legal Framework in Challenging Regulations (WEF GCI)

Transparent adjudicative and career systems

Transparency of Government Policymaking (WEF GCI)

Corruption Index (WB)

Political-economic system capacity

Matrix

CRI

Presence of public legitimacy and trust

State Legitimacy (FSI)

Voice and Accountability (WB)

Freedom of Expression and Belief (FSI)

Adequate fiscal system to fund programs and projects

Government Budget Balance (% GDP) (OE)

Gross Government Debt (% of GDP) (IMF)

Resource mobilization

Access to information

Press Freedom Index (Reporters Without Borders)

BTI

Administrative resource capacity

Matrix

BTI

Funding, staffing

 

Levels of intra- and inter-agency communication, consultation, and coordination.

Civil society traditions

Conflict intensity

Policy coordination

Cleavage/conflict management

Civil society participation

Accountability and responsibility system capacity

Matrix

BTI

Presence of rule of law

Monopoly on the use of force

No interference of religious dogmas

Basic administration

Separation of powers

Independent judiciary

Prosecution of office abuse

Civil rights

Transparent adjudicative and career systems

Free and fair elections

Anti-corruption policy

Knowledge system capacity

Matrix

BTI

Presence of high quality educational and training institutions

 

Opportunities for knowledge generation, mobilization and use

Policy learning

Managerial expertise capacity

Matrix

BTI

Strategic management

 

Leadership, communication, negotiation and conflict resolution

 

Financial management and budgeting

Efficient use of assets

Organizational political capacity

Matrix

BTI

Effective civil service bargain

Effective power to govern

Politicians’ support for the agency programs and projects

Structural constraints

Levels of inter-organizational trust and communication

Reconciliation

Political acumen‎ capacity

Matrix

BTI

Understanding of the needs and positions of different stakeholders

 

Judgment of political feasibility

Prioritization

Consensus on goals

Communication skills

 

Political-economic system capacity

Matrix

BTI

Presence of public legitimacy and trust

Agreement about citizenship and acceptance of the

nation-state as legitimate

Performance of democratic institutions

Commitment to democratic institutions

Adequate fiscal system to fund programs and projects

 

Access to information

 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hartley, K., Zhang, J. (2018). Measuring Policy Capacity Through Governance Indices. In: Wu, X., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. (eds) Policy Capacity and Governance. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54675-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics