Skip to main content

Policy Capacity: Conceptual Framework and Essential Components

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Policy Capacity and Governance

Part of the book series: Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy ((PEPP))

Abstract

Although policy capacity is among the most fundamental concepts in studying public policy, there are considerable disagreements on its conceptual definitions and few systematic efforts to operationalize and measure it. This chapter presents a conceptual framework for analyzing and measuring policy capacity under which policy capacity refers to the skills and resources that governments bring to policy-making. In it policy competences are categorized into three general types of skills essential for policy success—analytical, operational and political—and policy capabilities or resources are assessed at the individual, organizational and system levels. Policy failures often result from imbalanced attention to these nine different components of policy capacity. The conceptual framework presented in the chapter provides a diagnostic tool to identify capacity gaps and offer critical insights into strategies to overcome such gaps in professional behaviour, organizational and managerial activities, and the policy systems involved in policy-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akeroyd, J. (2009). Information architecture and e-government. INFuture, 687–701. www.infoz.ffzg.hr/INFuture/2009/papers%5CINFuture2009.pdf.

  • Ambali, A. R. (2010). E-government in public sector: Policy implications and recommendations for policy-makers. Research Journal of Internatıonal Studies, 17, 133–145. http://www.eurojournals.com/RJIS_17_10.pdf.

  • Bakvis, H. (2000). Rebuilding policy capacity in the era of the fiscal dividend: A report from Canada. Governance, 13(1), 71–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. J., & Raab, C. D. (2003). The governance of privacy: Policy instruments in global perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blind, P. K. (2006). Building trust in government in the twenty first century: Review of literature and emerging issues. New York: UNDESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P., & Davis, G. (2000). The Australian policy handbook. Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. P., Larissa, B., & Vira, N. (2013). Building policy capacity at the Ukrainian centre: The policy units project. Canadian Public Administration, 56(3), 433–455. doi:10.1111/capa.12029.

  • Bullock, H., Mountford, J., & Stanley, R. (2001). Better policy-making. London: Centre for Management and Policy Studies, Cabinet Office, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Government. (1996). Strengthening our policy capacity. Report of the task force on strengthening the policy capacity of the federal government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CommGAP. (2009). ‘Communication for good governance’, Communication for governance and accountability program. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&type=Document&id=3718.

  • Davies, H. T. O, Nutley, S. M, & Smith, P. C (Eds.). (2000). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellegi, I. (1996). Strengthening our policy capacity. Ottawa: Deputy Ministers Task Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368. doi:10.1111/gove.12035.

  • Gleeson, D. H., Legge, D. G., & O’Neill, D. (2009). Evaluating health policy capacity: Learning from international and Australian experience. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 6(1), 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, D., Legge, D., O’Neill, D., & Pfeffer, M. (2011). Negotiating tensions in developing organizational policy capacity: Comparative lessons to be drawn. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(3), 237–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., & Lonti, Z. (2008). Chasing shadows? Performance measurement of policy advice in New Zealand government departments. Public Administration, 86(3), 837–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haider, H., Mcloughlin, C. & Scott, Z. (2011). Topic guide: Communication and governance. The World Bank. http://www.gsdrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/CommGAP2.pdf.

  • Hallsworth, M., & Rutter, J. (2011). Making policy better : Improving whitehall’s core business. London: The Institute for Government. http://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/our-work/better-policy-making/making-policy-better.

  • Hicklin, A., & Godwin, E. (2009). Agents of change: The role of policy managers in public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, S., & Rothstein, B. (2012). Good government: The relevance of political science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (2002). Control, bargains, and cheating: The politics of public-service reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(3), 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2004). Administrative styles and the limits of administrative reform: A neo-institutional analysis of administrative culture. Canadian Public Administration, 46(4), 471–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2009, June). Government communication as a policy tool: A framework for analysis. The Canadian Political Science Review‚ 3(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Lindquist, E. (2004). Policy analysis and governance: Analytical and policy styles in Canada. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 6(3), 225–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Walker, R. M. (2012, May 1). Public managers in the policy process: More evidence on the missing variable? Policy Studies Journal 40(2), 211–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2015). Achilles’ heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures: The achilles heel of governance. Regulation & Governance, n/a–n/a. doi:10.1111/rego.12091.

  • Huber, G. P. (1991). Organization learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L. G., Grandia, J., & Van der Voet, J. (2014, March 1). The management of change in public organisations: A literature review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1–20. doi:10.1111/padm.12040.

  • Kwaterski, J. (2010). Opportunities for rationalizing the capacity development knowledge architecture. China: The World Bank Institute and Learning Network for Capacity Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P. J. (1999). Fostering policy learning: A challenge for public administration. International Review of Public Administration, 4(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M. J., Lee J., & Roh, C.-Y. (2014). The evolution of internal IT applications and e-government studies in public administration research themes and methods. Administration & Society, 46(1), 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD DAC. (2006). The challenge of capacity development: Working towards good practice. http://www.gsdrc.org/docs/open/CC110.pdf.

  • Oh, C. H. (1997). Explaining the impact of policy information on policy-making. Knowledge and Policy, 10(3), 22–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliphant, S., & Howlett, M. (2010) Assessing policy analytical capacity: Insights from a study of the Canadian environmental policy advice system. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 12(4), 435–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouimet, M., Bédard, P.-O., Turgeon, J., Lavis, J. N., Gélineau, F., & Gagnon, F, et al. (2010, November 22). Correlates of consulting research evidence among policy analysts in government ministries: A cross-sectional survey. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 6(4), 433–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, M., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2005). Challenges to state policy capacity: Global trends and comparative perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. (2004). Not just steering but weaving: Relevant knowledge and the craft of building policy capacity and coherence. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(1), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2001). The Politics of Bureaucracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2004). The search for coordination and coherence in public policy: Return to the center?

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, L. A., Salmon, T., & Raile, A. (2008). ‘Using public will to secure political will’, ch. 7 in governance reform under real world conditions. In S. Odugbemi & T. Jacobson (Eds.), Communication for governance and accountability program. Washington DC: World Bank. http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&type=Document&id=3710.

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2014, October 30). Recovering the ‘craft’ of public administration in network governance. Perth: Keynote Address to the IPAA National Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, R. I. (2014). Good governance means performance and results. Governance, n/a–n/a. doi:10.1111/gove.12084.

  • Rothstein, H., Borraz, O., & Huber, M. (2012). Risk and the limits of governance: Exploring varied patterns of risk-based governance across Europe. Regulation & Governance, n/a–n/a. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01153.x.

  • Salamon, L. M. (2002). The new governance and the tools of public action. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 1–47). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomonsen, H. H., & Knudsen, T. (2011). Changes in public service bargains: Ministers and civil servants in Denmark. Public Administration, 89(3), 1015–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savoia, A., & Sen, K. (2014). Measurement, evolution, determinants, and consequences of state capacity: A review of recent research, Journal of Economic Surveys. doi:10.1111/joes.12065.

  • Savoie, D. (2003). Breaking the bargain: Public servants, ministers and parliament. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiernan, A., & Wanna, J. (2006). Competence, capacity, capability: Towards conceptual clarity in the discourse of declining policy skills. Presented at the govnet international conference, Australian National University. Canberra: ANU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiernan, A. (2015). Craft and capacity in the public service. Australian Journal of Public Administration. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, M. (1992). Evaluating policy advice. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 51(4), 440–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. (2013). Improving the capacity to govern based on rules in China. Public Administration Review, n/a–n/a. doi:10.1111/puar.12107.

  • Wu, X., Ramesh, M., Howlett, M., & Fritzen, S. (2010). The public policy primer: Managing public policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Lee, R., & Yang, K. (2012). Knowledge and skills for policy-making: Stories from local public managers in Florida. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(1), 183–208.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xun Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wu, X., Ramesh, M., Howlett, M. (2018). Policy Capacity: Conceptual Framework and Essential Components. In: Wu, X., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. (eds) Policy Capacity and Governance. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54675-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics