Abstract
The main focus of the what question of systemic thinking is on the articulation and organization of the objectives of the problem that we are trying to gain increased understanding of. Given that a mess is a system of problems as we described it in Chap. 2, we take the occasion in this chapter to dissect a given problem into its basic elements in order to gain further insight regarding its parent mess. This chapter builds on the stakeholder analysis undertaken in the previous chapter. The chapter begins by discussing the anatomy of a problem. Then, the importance of objectives is discussed. Next, we address objective articulation. We then distinguish between fundamental and means objectives and discuss how to organize them to increase our understanding. Finally, a framework for addressing the what question is presented and this framework is demonstrated on the real estate problem introduced in Chap. 6.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, K. M. (2011). Systems principles: Foundation for the SoSE methodology. International Journal of System of Systems Engineering, 2(2/3), 120–155. doi:10.1504/IJSSE.2011.040550.
Cherns, A. (1976). The principles of sociotechnical design. Human Relations, 29(8), 783–792. doi:10.1177/001872677602900806.
Cherns, A. (1987). The principles of sociotechnical design revisited. Human Relations, 40(3), 153–161.
Clemen, R. T., & Reilly, T. (2014). Making hard decisions with decision tools (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.
Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review, 70(11), 35–36.
Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (2002). Smart choices: A practical guide to making better life decisions. New York: Broadway Books.
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. G. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley & Sons.
MacCrimmon, K. R. (1969). Improving the system design and evaluation process by the use of trade-off information: An application to northest corridor transportation planning (RM-5877-DOT), CA. Retrieved 1969, from Santa Monica.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capability for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
Pattee, H. H. (1973). Hierarchy theory: The challenge of complex systems. New York: George Braziller.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Simon, H. A. (1974). How big is a chunk? Science, 183(4124), 482–488.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hester, P.T., Adams, K.M. (2017). The What of Systemic Thinking. In: Systemic Decision Making. Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54672-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54672-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54671-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54672-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)