Advertisement

Abstract

In the conclusion, it is argued that the institutional history of general relativity and the final structure of the International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation were somewhat peculiar, if not unique, with respect to the various institutionalization processes of international scientific cooperation in the post-World War II period. After reviewing the various cultural, social, political, and epistemic tensions characterizing the development of the international community and its institutional representation, possible explanations of why the field of general relativity was conducive to the establishment of this quite original institutional structure are addressed. It is argued that this question cannot be separated from questions concerning the effective relevance of the community-building activities for the process of the renaissance of general relativity. These activities shaped the return of general relativity to the mainstream of physics during the formative phase of the “General Relativity and Gravitation” community. Other relevant factors were the special character of general relativity—which was perceived to be unrelated to any direct military applications—and the role model Einstein embodied for scientists working on both sides of the Iron Curtain. Finally, a programmatic reflection on the function held by scientists/community builders in the evolution of scientific knowledge is proposed, based on André Mercier’s role in this specific case.

Keywords

Albert Einstein André Mercier Cold War Community building General relativity Internationalism in science International Committee on General Relativity and Gravitation Relativistic astrophysics Scientific institution 

References

  1. Avramov, Iordan. 1999. An apprenticeship in scientific communication: The early correspondence of Henry Oldenburg (1656–1663). Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 53: 187–201.Google Scholar
  2. Barrow, John D. 2005. Einstein as icon. Nature 433: 218–219. doi: 10.1038/433218a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blum, Alexander, Roberto Lalli, and Jürgen Renn. 2015. The reinvention of general relativity: A historiographical framework for assessing one hundred years of curved space-time. Isis 106: 598–620.Google Scholar
  4. Braun, Reiner (ed.). 2005. Einstein-peace now!: Visions and ideas. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.Google Scholar
  5. Hall, A. Rupert. 1970. Henry Oldenburg et les relations scientifiques au XVII siècle. Revue d’histoire des sciences 23: 285–304.Google Scholar
  6. Hall, Marie Boas. 2002. Henry Oldenburg: Shaping the Royal Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hall, A. Rupert, and Marie Boas Hall (ed.). 1965–1986. The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, 13 Vols. London: Madison.Google Scholar
  8. Hoffmann, Dieter. 2017. Albert Einstein (1879–1955) – relativ politisch. In Physik, Militär und Frieden. Physiker zwischen Rüstungsforschung und Friedensbewegung, ed. C. Forstnerm and G. Neuneck. Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum Research. (in print).Google Scholar
  9. Lalli, Roberto. 2014. A new scientific journal takes the scene: The birth of Reviews of Modern Physics. Annalen der Physik 526: A83–A87.Google Scholar
  10. Lalli, Roberto. 2015. “The Renaissance of physics”: Karl K. Darrow (1891–1982) and the dissemination of quantum theory at the Bell Telephone Laboratories. In A bridge between conceptual frameworks: Sciences, society and technology studies, ed. Raffaele Pisano, 249–273. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9645-3_14.
  11. Lalli, Roberto. 2016. “Dirty work”, but someone has to do it: Howard P. Robertson and the refereeing practices of Physical Review in the 1930s. Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science 70: 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lalli, Roberto, and Dirk Wintergrün. 2016. Building a scientific field in the Post-WWII Era: A network analysis of the renaissance of general relativity. Invited talk at the Forschungskolloquium zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Technische Universität, Berlin, 15 June 2016.Google Scholar
  13. Mercier, André, and Jonathan Schaer. 1962. General information. Bulletin on General Relativity and Gravitation 1: 1–2. doi: 10.1007/BF02983127.Google Scholar
  14. Rees, Martin J., Remo Ruffini, and John Archibald Wheeler. 1974. Black holes, gravitational waves, and cosmology: An introduction to current research. New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  15. Renn, Jürgen, Dirk Wintergrün, Roberto Lalli, Manfred Laubichler, and Matteo Valleriani. 2016. Netzwerke als Wissensspeicher. In Die Zukunft der Wissensspeicher : Forschen, Sammeln und Vermitte im 21 Jahrhundert, ed. Jürgen Mittelstraßm and Ulrich Rüdiger, 35–79. München: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz.Google Scholar
  16. Rowe, David E., and Robert J. Schulmann. 2007. Einstein on politics: His private thoughts and public stands on nationalism, Zionism, war, peace, and the bomb. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Thorne, Kip S. 1994. Black holes and time warps: Einstein’s outrageous legacy. New York: WWNorton.Google Scholar
  18. Treder, Jürgen (ed.). 1979. Einstein-Centenarium 1979. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations