Advertisement

(Re-)Establishing International Cooperation After World War II

  • Roberto LalliEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in History of Science and Technology book series (BRIEFSHIST)

Abstract

The complex landscape of the scientific institutions operating at the international level in the post-World War II period is outlined here. Around the mid-1950s, when the community-building activities connected to general relativity first began, a reconfiguration of these institutions for the promotion and organization of international cooperation in science was under way. The motivations for, and constraints of, this transformation were defined by the world order that was being constructed after the end of World War II and by the evolution of the Cold War. For those willing to create a new structure for promoting general relativity in the international arena, these existing institutions provided both a model to follow and a larger established structure with which to interact. It is argued that one of the major structural changes in institutions such as the International Unions was that they began promoting specific areas of research at this point, while before World War II their role was limited to define international standards. Besides these structural changes in scientific institutions, the second major element was the changing political context related to the post-Stalinist reforms in the Soviet Union and the related détente in international relations that led to an increasing participation of Soviet scientists in international scientific institutions.

Keywords

Cold war  International Council of Scientific Unions  International relations International Union of Pure and Applied Physics Scientific internationalism Scientific institutions  Soviet Union  UNESCO 

References

  1. Anon. 1992. UIPPA-IUPAP 1922–1992. Album souvenir realized in Quebec by the Secretariat of IUPAP. http://iupap.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/history.pdf. Accessed 7 Mar 2016.
  2. Armstrong, John A. 1954. The Soviet attitude toward UNESCO. International Organization 8: 217–233.Google Scholar
  3. Crawford, Elisabeth. 1990. The universe of international science, 1880–1939. In Solomon’s house revisited: The organization and institutionalization of science, ed. Tore Frängsmyr, 251–269. Canton, MA: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Crawford, Elisabeth, Terry Shinn, and Sverker Sörlin. 1993. The nationalization and denationalization of the sciences: An introductory essay. In Denationalizing Science, ed. Elisabeth Crawford, Terry Shinn, and Sverker Sörlin, 1–42. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-1221-7_1.
  5. Elzinga, Aant. 1996. Modes of internationalism. In Internationalism and science, ed. Aant Elzinga, and Catharina Landstrom, 3–20. London: Taylor Graham.Google Scholar
  6. Fennell, Roger. 1994. History of IUPAC, 1919–1987. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Forman, Paul. 1973. Scientific internationalism and the Weimar physicists: The ideology and its manipulation in Germany after World War I. Isis 64: 151–180.Google Scholar
  8. Fox, Robert. 2016. Science without frontiers: Cosmopolitanism and national interests in the world of learning, 1870–1940. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gerovitch, Slava. 2002. From Newspeak to cyberspeak: A history of soviet cybernetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Graham, Loren R. 1972. Science and philosophy in the Soviet Union. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  11. Graham, Loren R. 1993. Science in Russia and the Soviet Union: A short history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Greenaway, Frank. 1996. Science international: A history of the International Council of Scientific Unions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hall, Karl. 2003. Europe and Russia. In The Oxford companion to the history of modern science, ed. John Heilbron, 279–282. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hollings, Christopher D. 2016. Scientific communication across the Iron Curtain. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25346-6.
  15. Holloway, David. 1994. Stalin and the bomb: The Soviet Union and atomic energy, 1939–1956. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Howard, John N. 2203. The early meeting of the International Commission of Optics. Optics and Photonics news. June 2003: 16–17.Google Scholar
  17. Ivanov, Konstantin. 2002. Science after Stalin: Forging a new image of Soviet science. Science in Context 15: 317–338.Google Scholar
  18. Josephson, Paul R. 1991. Physics and politics in revolutionary Russia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kaiser, David. 2002. Cold War requisitions, scientific manpower, and the production of American physicists after World War II. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 33: 131–159. doi: 10.1525/hsps.2002.33.1.131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kojevnikov, Aleksei B. 2004. Stalin’s great science: The times and adventures of Soviet physicists. London: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lehto, Olli. 1998. Mathematics without borders: A history of the International Mathematical Union. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Mastny, Vojtech. 2010. Soviet foreign policy, 1953–1962. In The Cambridge History of the Cold War, Vol. 1, Origins, ed. Melvyn P. Leffler, and Odd A. Westad, 312–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Pollock, Ethan. 2006. Stalin and the Soviet science wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rabkin, Yakov M. 1988. Science between the superpowers. New York: Priority Press.Google Scholar
  25. Schroeder-Gudehus, Brigitte. 1978. Les scientifiques et la paix: La communauté scientifique internationale au cours des années 20. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  26. Schroeder-Gudehus, Brigitte. 1990. Nationalism and internationalism. In Companion to the History of Modern Science, ed. R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie, and M. J. S. Hodge, 909–19. Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Sewell, James Patrick. 1975. UNESCO and world politics: Engaging in international relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Vizgin, V.P., and G.E. Gorelik. 1987. The reception of the theory of relativity in Russia and the USSR. In The comparative reception of relativity, ed. Thomas F. Glick, 354–363. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  29. Wang, Zuoyue. 1999. U.S.-China scientific exchange: A case study of state-sponsored scientific internationalism during the Cold War and beyond. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 30: 249–277. doi: 10.2307/27757826.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations