Abstract
An increased overjet in the primary or mixed dentition is a common reason to seek orthodontic treatment and is usually indicative of an underlying class II malocclusion. This can be due to a variety of factors, including digit sucking, a lip trap or an underlying skeletal II base relationship. Treatment timing has been controversial, with proponents of early treatment claiming it results in greater growth of the mandible and better outcomes for the patient. However, evidence from several large randomised clinical trials investigating early treatment for class II malocclusion have refuted this, essentially showing few clinical differences in outcome for patients who underwent an early course of treatment in the mixed dentition compared to those treated comprehensively in adolescence. However, patients treated early do seem to experience less dentoalveolar trauma than those treated later, although this is generally not severe, and it is debatable whether the slight reduction in risk justifies the cost and burden to the patient of early treatment. Another justification for early treatment is psychological outcome. An increased overjet has been shown to make a child a target for bullying, and there is weak evidence that early treatment can help these patients. If early treatment is embarked upon, there are several modalities that can be used, one of which is a functional appliance. These appliances primarily reduce an increased overjet by dental movement, retroclining the upper incisors and proclining the lowers. There is a small increase in mandibular length, but this disappears with normal growth. Most patients will need a further course of treatment, which will mean maintaining overjet reduction in the transition from early mixed to permanent dentitions. In most cases, it is more efficient and less demanding on patient compliance to delay treatment until early adolescence in the late mixed dentition, as clinical outcome is likely to be the same.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Holmes A. The prevalence of orthodontic treatment need. Br J Orthod. 1992;19(3):177–82.
Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998;13:97–106.
Dimberg L, Lennartsson B, Arnrup K, Bondemark L. Prevalence and change of malocclusions from primary to early permanent dentition: a longitudinal study. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(5):728–34.
You ZH, Fishman LS, Rosenblum RE, Subtelny JD. Dentoalveolar changes related to mandibular forward growth in untreated Class II persons. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;120:598–607.
McNamara JA Jr. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1981;51(3):177–202.
Mew JR. The postural basis of malocclusion: a philosophical overview. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;126(6):729–38.
Woodside DG, Linder-Aronson S, Lundstrom A, et al. Mandibular and maxillary growth after changed mode of breathing. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1991;100:1–18.
Patel A. Digit sucking habits in children resident in Kettering (UK). J Orthod. 2008;35:255–61.
Singh S, Utreja A, Chawla H. Distribution of malocclusion types among thumb suckers seeking orthodontic treatment. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008;26(26):114–7.
Bishara SE, Warren JJ, Broffitt B, Levy SM. Changes in the prevalence of nonnutritive sucking patterns in the first 8 years of life. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130(1):31–6.
Warren JJ, Bishara SE. Duration of nutritive and nonnutritive sucking behaviors and their effects on the dental arches in the primary dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2002;121(4):347–56.
Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen DA, Cabassa S, et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;113:40–50.
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003b;124(3):234–43.
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: psychosocial effects. J Orthod. 2003a;124:488–95.
Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;111(4):391–400.
Dolce C, McGorray SP, Brazeau L, King GJ, Wheeler TT. Timing of Class II treatment: Skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(4):481–9.
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Appelbe P, Davies L, Connolly I, et al. Early treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135(5):573–9.
Tulloch JFC, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;125(6):657–67.
Seehra J, Fleming P, Newton T, Dibiase A. Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion, self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life. J Orthod. 2011;38(4):247–56.
Seehra J, Newton JT, Dibiase AT. Interceptive orthodontic treatment in bullied adolescents and its impact on self-esteem and oral-health-related quality of life. Eur Orthod. 2013;35:615–21.
Schatz JP, Hakeberg M, Ostini E, Kiliaridis S. Prevalence of traumatic injuries to permanent dentition and its association with overjet in a Swiss child population. Dent Traumatol. 2013;29(2):110–4.
Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, Worthington HV, O’Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:CD003452.
Andersson L. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries. J Endod. 2013;39(3 Suppl):S2–5.
Petti S. Over two hundred million injuries to anterior teeth attributable to large overjet: a meta-analysis. Dent Traumatol. 2015;31(1):1–8.
Nanda RS, Kierl MJ. Prediction of cooperation in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;102(1):15–21.
Fleming PS, Scott P, DiBiase AT. Compliance: getting the most from your orthodontic patients. Dent Update. 2007;34(9):565–6, 569–70, 572.
Trenouth MJ. Do failed appointments lead to discontinuation of orthodontic treatment? Angle Orthod. 2003;73(1):51–5.
Bartsch A, Witt E, Sahm G, Schneider S. Correlates of objective patient compliance with removable appliance wear. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993;104(4):378–86.
Borrie FRP, Bearn DR, NPT I, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z. Interventions for the cessation of non-nutritive sucking habits in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:CD008694.
Baccetti F, Franchi L, Toth L, et al. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000;118:159–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
DiBiase, A., Sandler, P.J. (2017). Early Treatment of Class II Malocclusion. In: Cobourne, M. (eds) Orthodontic Management of the Developing Dentition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54637-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54637-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54635-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54637-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)