Skip to main content

First Permanent Molars

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1889 Accesses

Abstract

Complications with the formation and eruption of first permanent molars can result in patients in the mixed dentition stage of development seeking orthodontic advice. The prognosis of first permanent molars can also be compromised by dental decay, and this can mean decisions have to be made with regard to the optimum timing of extractions in relation to the developing occlusion.

A structured assessment includes consideration of patient compliance with dental treatment, prognosis of the teeth, presence or absence of crowding and the underlying skeletal pattern.

Advice provided regarding the timing of the extraction of first permanent molars will reflect any future need for orthodontic treatment, and the impact first permanent molar extractions will have on the anchorage management during future orthodontic treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Khalaf K, Miskelly J, Voge E, Macfarlane TV. Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthod. 2014;41(4):299–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ooë T. Human tooth and dental arch development. St. Louis: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berkovitz BKB, Holland GR, Moxham BJ. Oral anatomy, embryology and histology. New York: Mosby; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nanci A. Ten Cate’s Oral Histoligy Development, structure and Functions, 8/e. Elsevier india; 2012. Ten Cate AR. Oral anatomy: development, structure and function; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crombie F, Manton D, Kilpatrick N. Aetiology of molar–incisor hypomineralization: a critical review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009;19(2):73–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Young DH. Ectopic eruption of the first permanent molar. J Dent Child. 1957;24:153–62.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prece JW. The incidence of unerupted permanent teeth and related clinical cases. Oral Surg. 1985;29:420–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pitts NB, Chestnutt IG, Evans D, White D, Chadwick B, Steele JG. 1 Verifiable CPD Paper: the dentinal caries experience of children in the United Kingdom, 2003. Br Dent J. 2006;200(6):313–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Albadri S, Zaitoun H, McDonnell ST, Davidson LE. Extraction of first permanent molar teeth: results from three dental hospitals. Br Dent J. 2007;203(7):E14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004;32(3):217–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grahnén H. Hypodontia in the permanent dentition: a clinical and genetical investigation, vol. 3. Lund: Gleerup; 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haavikko K. Hypodontia of permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study. Suom Hammaslaak Toim. 1970;67(4):219–25.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neal JJ, Bowden DE. The diagnostic value of panoramic radiographs in children aged nine to ten years. Br J Orthod. 1988;15(3):193–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thunold K. Early loss of the first molars 25 years after. In: Report of the congress. European Orthodontic Society; 1970. p. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cobourne MT, Williams A, Harrison M. National clinical guidelines for the extraction of first permanent molars in children. Br Dent J. 2014;217:643–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Summary

When assessing young patients presenting with FPMs of poor prognosis, a number of considerations have to be taken into account. These include the prognosis of the individual teeth, the developing occlusion and the likely mechanics of possible future orthodontic treatment.

In summary the key principles that can be applied to individual cases include:

  • In young patients, FPMs may have to be extracted even if this complicates future orthodontic treatment. This can be due to the individual teeth being unrestorable or the patient not being compliant with the restorative treatment required to stabilise the teeth.

  • In young patients with developing, significant malocclusions that are likely to require permanent tooth extractions as part of their future orthodontic treatment, delaying the extraction of the FPMs until the second permanent molars erupt can complicate the anchorage management of the future orthodontic treatment but will reduce the need for the additional extraction of permanent teeth.

  • After the extraction of an upper FPM, space closure through the mesial migration of the upper second permanent molar is relatively predictable. If the upper FPM extraction space is required to correct a malocclusion, then anchorage reinforcement is required.

  • After the extraction of a lower FPM, space closure through the mesial migration of the lower SPM is less predictable. If the relief of anterior crowding or the retraction of the lower labial segment is not required during future orthodontic treatment, it is advisable to extract the lower FPM at an optimum stage of dental development to allow for spontaneous closure of the extraction space.

  • The optimum stage of dental development to allow spontaneous space closure to occur has been associated with the onset of the calcification of the bifurcation of the lower second permanent molar. However, this can be considered as a guide, and other factors such as the angulation of the lower Second permanent molar and the presence of the developing third molar are also useful indicators of the likelihood of spontaneous space closure occurring.

  • The compensating extraction of a sound upper FPM can allow for more predictable space closure in the lower arch when a poor prognosis lower FPM requires extraction and spontaneous space closure is desirable. The compensating extraction of an unrestored lower FPM is not recommended to facilitate space closure if an upper FPM is extracted.

  • The balancing extraction of unrestored FPMs to maintain arch symmetry is not routinely recommended.

  • With appropriate orthodontic advice provided in the mixed dentition and contemporary orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and planned anchorage reinforcement in the permanent dentition, the need to extract permanent teeth in addition to the extraction of poor prognosis FPMs can be avoided in the majority of clinical cases.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gavin J. Mack .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mack, G.J. (2017). First Permanent Molars. In: Cobourne, M. (eds) Orthodontic Management of the Developing Dentition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54637-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54637-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54635-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54637-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics