Advertisement

Interior and Exterior Shape Representations Using the Screened Poisson Equation

  • Laura A. Rolston
  • Nathan D. CahillEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10149)

Abstract

Shape classification is a required task in many systems for image and video understanding. Implicit shape representations, such as the solutions to the Eikonal or Poisson equations defined on the shape, have been shown to be particularly effective for generating features that are useful for classification. The Poisson-based shape representation can be derived at each point inside the shape as the expected time for a particle undergoing Brownian motion to hit the shape boundary. This representation has no natural generalization when considering points outside of a shape, however, because the corresponding Brownian motion would have infinite expected hitting time. In this article, we modify the Brownian motion model by introducing an exponential lifetime for the particle, yielding a random variable whose expected value satisfies a screened Poisson equation that can be solved at points both interior and exterior to the shape. We then show how moments of this new random variable can be used to improve classification results on experiments with natural silhouettes and handwritten numerals.

Keywords

Implicit shape representation Shape classification 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Lena Gorelick for helpful discussions.

References

  1. 1.
    Biederman, I.: Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol. Rev. 94(2), 115 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blank, M., Gorelick, L., Shechtman, E., Irani, M., Basri, R.: Actions as space-time shapes. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2, pp. 1395–1402 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blum, H.: A transformation for extracting new descriptions of shape. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Form (1964)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blum, H., Nagel, R.N.: Shape description using weighted symmetric axis features. Pattern Recogn. 10(3), 167–180 (1978)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fabbri, R., Costa, L.D.F., Torelli, J.C., Bruno, O.M.: 2D Euclidean distance transform algorithms: a comparative survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 40(1), 2 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flusser, J.: On the independence of rotation moment invariants. Pattern Recogn. 33, 1405–1410 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gorelick, L., Galun, M., Sharon, E., Basri, R., Brandt, A.: Shape representation and classification using the Poisson equation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 28(12), 1991–2005 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    LeCun, Y., Cortes, C., Burges, C.J.C.: The MNIST database of handwritten digits. http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist/ (1998)
  9. 9.
    Ma, W.C., Wu, F.C., Ouhyoung, M.: Skeleton extraction of 3D objects with radial basis functions. In: Proceedings of IEEE Shape Modeling International, pp. 207–215 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maes, C., Fabry, T., Keustermans, J., Smeets, D., Suetens, P., Vandermeulen, D.: Feature detection on 3D face surfaces for pose normalisation and recognition. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory Applications and Systems, pp. 1–6 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marr, D., Nishihara, H.K.: Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 200(1140), 269–294 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Palágyi, K., Kuba, A.: A 3D 6-subiteration thinning algorithm for extracting medial lines. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 19(7), 613–627 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pentland, A.P.: Recognition by parts. Technical report, DTIC Document (1987)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pizer, S.M., Fletcher, P.T., Joshi, S., Thall, A., Chen, J.Z., Fridman, Y., Fritsch, D.S., Gash, A.G., Glotzer, J.M., Jiroutek, M.R., et al.: Deformable m-reps for 3D medical image segmentation. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 55(2–3), 85–106 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pizer, S.M., Fritsch, D.S., Yushkevich, P.A., Johnson, V.E., Chaney, E.L.: Segmentation, registration, and measurement of shape variation via image object shape. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18(10), 851–865 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shaked, D., Bruckstein, A.M.: Pruning medial axes. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 69(2), 156–169 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Siddiqi, K., Kimia, B.B.: Parts of visual form: computational aspects. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 17(3), 239–251 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yogarajah, P., Condell, J.V., Prasad, G.: PRWGEI: poisson random walk based gait recognition. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, pp. 662–667 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou, Y., Kaufman, A., Toga, A.W.: Three-dimensional skeleton and centerline generation based on an approximate minimum distance field. Vis. Comput. 14(7), 303–314 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Image Computing and Analysis Lab (ICAL), School of Mathematical SciencesRochester Institute of TechnologyRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations