Promoting Engagement via Research-Rich Environments

  • Kay SambellEmail author
  • Sally Brown
  • Linda Graham


This chapter focuses on work which looks to enhance student learning by strengthening the ties between teaching and research in higher education.


  1. ACUR Useful Websites. (2014). Retrieved December 13, 2016, from
  2. Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(3), 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BCUR. (2010). Undergraduate Journals. Retrieved December 13, 2016 from
  4. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate (3rd ed.). Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  5. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook: State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
  6. Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, S. (2015). Learning, teaching and assessment in higher education: Global perspectives. London: Palgrave-MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carless, D. (2015). Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education, 69(6), 963–976.Google Scholar
  10. Claxton, G. (2011). Higher education as epistemic apprenticeship. Keynote: NAIRTL.Google Scholar
  11. Cuneo, C., Harnish, D., Roy, D., & Vajoczki, S. (2012). Lessons learned: The McMaster inquiry story from innovation to institutionalization. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2012(129), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffiths, R. (2004). Knowledge production and the research–teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 709–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York: HE Academy. Retrieved December 13, 2016 from
  15. Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2016). Linking discipline-based research with teaching to benefit student learning through engaging students in research and inquiry. Retrieved January 6th, 2016 from
  16. Healey, M., Jordan, F., Pell, B., & Short, C. (2010). The research-teaching nexus: A case study of students’ awareness, experiences and perceptions of research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodge, D. C., Nadler, M. K., Shore, C., & Taylor, B. A. (2011). Institutionalizing large scale curricular change: The Top 25 project at Miami University. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(5), 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodge, D., Pasquesi, K., Hirsh, M., & LePore, P. (2007). From convocation to capstone: Developing the student as scholar. In Keynote address at the Association of American Colleges and Universities Network for Academic Renewal Conference, April 19–21, Long Beach, California.Google Scholar
  19. Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2012). Research-led or research based undergraduate curricula. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (Eds.), University teaching in focus (pp. 128–144). Victoria Australia: Acer Press and Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  20. Jenkins, A., Healey, M., & Zetter, R. (2007). Linking teaching and research in disciplines and departments. York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  21. Justice, C., Warry, W., & Rice, J. (2009). Academic skill development-inquiry seminars can make a difference: Evidence from a quasi-experimental study. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahn, P., & O’Rourke, K. (2005). Understanding enquiry-based learning. In T. Barrett, I. MacLabhrainn, & H. Fallon (Eds.), Handbook of enquiry and problem-based learning: Irish case studies and international perspectives. All-Ireland Society for Higher Educations (AISHE).
  23. Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kibby, M. (2008). Enquiry-based learning in the humanities. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 15(1), 255–260.Google Scholar
  25. Kift, S. (2009). Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and to enhance the first year student learning experience in Australian higher education: Final report for ALTC senior fellowship program. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.Google Scholar
  26. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Associates, E. W. J. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Magolda, M. B. B. (1999). Creating contexts for learning and self-authorship: Constructive-developmental pedagogy. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Magolda, M. B. B. (2004). Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promote self-development. Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
  30. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning—Theory and practice ten years on (pp. 412–424). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development (OCSLD).Google Scholar
  31. Meyer, J. H., Land, R., & Baillie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Milsom, C., Stewart, M., & Yorke, M. (Eds.). (2014). Stepping up to the Second year at university: Academic, psychological and social dimensions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Northedge, A. (2003). Enabling participation in academic discourse. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Northedge, A., & McArthur, J. (2008). Guiding students into a discipline. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 107–118). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  35. Reinvention Centre. (n.d.). The Reinvention centre for undergraduate research. Retrieved December 13, 2016, from
  36. Sambell, K. (2010). Enquiry-based learning and formative assessment environments: student perspectives. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 4(1), 52–61.Google Scholar
  37. Savin-Baden, M. (2004). Understanding the impact of assessment on students in problem-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(2), 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spronken-Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stevenson, J., & Clegg, S. (2011). Possible selves: Students orientating themselves towards the future through extracurricular activity. British Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2004). Retention and student success in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Learning and Teaching EnhancementEdinburgh Napier UniversityEdinburghScotland
  2. 2.Emerita Professor, Leeds Beckett University and Independent consultantNewcastleUK
  3. 3.Department of Social Work, Education and Community WellbeingNorthumbria UniversityNewcastleUK

Personalised recommendations