From Teaching to Learning: Key Concepts and Foundational Principles

  • Kay Sambell
  • Sally Brown
  • Linda Graham


Signposts some of the main theoretical concepts that are widely used to describe and discuss issues about teaching for effective learning and the design of engaging curricula in higher education


Student engagementStudent Engagement National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE) Active learningActive Learning involvementInvolvement knowledgeKnowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Astin, A. W. (1977). Four critical years: Effects of college on beliefs, attitudes and knowledge (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement. A developmental theory for Higher Education. The Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.Google Scholar
  3. Auerbach, A. J., & Schussler, E. E. (2016). Instructor use of group active learning in an introductory biology sequence. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(5), 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, R. (2007). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Biggs, J. B. (1976). Dimensions of study behaviour: Another look at ATI. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  10. Birenbaum, M. (2003). New insights into learning and teaching and their implications for assessment. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 13–36). Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryson, C. (2014). Clarifying the concept of student engagement. In C. Bryson (Ed.), Understanding and developing student engagement (pp. 1–22). London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  13. Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3–7.Google Scholar
  14. Collins English Dictionary. (2016). ‘Definition of pedagogy’. Harper Collins. Retrieved December 14, 2016 from
  15. Dunne, E., & Owen, D. (Eds.). (2013). The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education. Harlow, United Kingdom: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  16. Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19(2), 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (2015). Understanding student learning. (Routledge Revivals). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2014). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice (4th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. London: Further Education Unit.Google Scholar
  20. Gibbs, G., Morgan, A., & Taylor, E. (1984). The world of the learner. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 165–188). Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Haggis, T. (2003). Constructing images of ourselves? A critical investigation into ‘approaches to learning’ research in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haggis, T. (2009). What have we been thinking of? A critical overview of 40 years of student learning research in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holgate, P. (2016). Developing a curriculum of engagement in architectural education at Northumbria University. Unpublished Ed.D. Thesis, Northumbria University.Google Scholar
  24. Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2002). The trouble with learning outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(3), 220–233.Google Scholar
  25. Hutchings, P. (2005). Building pedagogical intelligence. In Carnegie perspectives: A different way to think about teaching and learning. Stanford: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  26. Kandlbinder, P. (2013). Signature concepts of key researchers in higher education teaching and learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kandlbinder, P. (2014). Signature concepts of key researchers in North American higher education teaching and learning. Higher Education, 69(2), 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kane, L. (2004). Educators, learners and active learning methodologies. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 23(3), 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kember, D., Lee, K., & Li, N. (2001). Cultivating a sense of belonging in part-time students. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(4), 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved December 13, 2016 from
  31. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. C. (2008). What matters to student success: A review of the literature. ASHE Higher Education Report. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mann, S. J. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: L-outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practising, In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning—Theory and practice ten years on (pp. 412–424). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development (OCSLD).Google Scholar
  36. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pace, C. R. (1979). Measuring outcomes of college: Fifty years of findings and recommendations for the future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Pace, C. R. (1982). Achievement and the quality of student effort. Los Angeles‚ CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  40. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students Vol. 2: A Third decade of research (2nd edn.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In J. H. F. Meyer, & R. Land (Ed.). (2005), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 33–47). New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  42. Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Maidenhead, United Kingdom: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2013). Qualitative variation in approaches to university teaching and learning in large first-year classes. Higher Education, 67(6), 783–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Race, P. (2014). Making learning happen: A guide for post-compulsory education (3rd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Ramsden, P. (1987). Improving teaching and learning in higher education: The case for a relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 12(3), 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  48. Savin-Baden, M. (2007). Learning spaces: Creating opportunities for knowledge creation in academic life. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Solomonides, I., Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (Eds.). (2012). Engaging with learning in higher education. London, United Kingdom: Libri Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Spronken-Smith, R., Bullard, J., Ray, W., Roberts, C., & Keiffer, A. (2008). Where might sand dunes be on mars? Engaging students through inquiry-based learning in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tang, C. (1994). Assessment and student learning: Effects of modes of assessment on students’ preparation strategies. Improving student learning: Theory and practice (pp. 151–170). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.Google Scholar
  52. Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tinto, V. (2003). Learning better together: The impact of learning communities on student success. Higher Education Monograph Series, 1(8).Google Scholar
  54. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22(3), 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Warren, D. (2016). Course and learning design and evaluation. In H. Pokorny, & D. Warren (Eds.), Enhancing teaching practice in higher education (pp. 11–46). United Kingdom: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kay Sambell
    • 1
  • Sally Brown
    • 2
  • Linda Graham
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Learning and Teaching EnhancementEdinburgh Napier UniversityEdinburghScotland
  2. 2.Emerita Professor, Leeds Beckett University and Independent consultantNewcastleUK
  3. 3.Department of Social Work, Education and Community WellbeingNorthumbria UniversityNewcastleUK

Personalised recommendations