Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technology Management: Case of 3D Printing in Healthcare

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research and Development Management

Part of the book series: Science, Technology and Innovation Studies ((STAIS))

  • 1559 Accesses

Abstract

3D Printing is a radical innovation that is enabling us to create personalized objects at low cost and quickly. Similar to Amazon’s success in the revolutionizing the retailing industry with Ecommerce, 3D printing technology is showing the promise of turning healthcare on its heel with its capacity of rapid prototyping and personalizing the solution to the patient. This gives us an opportunity to study this innovation using technology management principles and tools. We explored the technology using engineering, technology forecast and motivating factors [Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)] models. We also conducted a market analysis to assess the expected economic return. The study highlighted the engineering challenge in developing the right biological materials and the appropriate 3D printing manufacturing processes. A time-based trend analysis of Bibliometrics in this technology segment drew us to the conclusion that this technology is straddling the innovator and the early adopter phases of the Technology Adoption Life Cycle (TALC). On the policy side, the motivating factors study highlighted the legal, ethical and regulatory challenges. But, the motivating factors review also highlighted the expansive benefits, both profit-based and humanitarian, of this technology. The research put together, showed that this disruptive technology will be a game-changer in the future of healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Van Woensel L, Archer G, Panades-Estruch L, Vrscaj D (2015) Ten technologies which could change our lives: potential impacts and policy implications. STOA, European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  2. Statista. Facts on the cosmetics industry. Statista [Online]. Available: http://www.statista.com/topics/1008/cosmetics-industry/. Accessed 15 Mar 2015

  3. Michalski MH, Ross JS (2014) The shape of things to come: 3D printing in medicine. JAMA 312(21):2213–2214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gayle D (2015) Two-year-old girl’s now living a normal life after pioneering surgeons use 3D printer to make copy of her heart. 25 Jan 2015 [Online]. Available: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2925771/Two-year-old-girl-s-living-normal-life-pioneering-surgeons-use-3D-printer-make-copy-heart.html. Accessed 7 Mar 2015

  5. US Department of Health and Human Services. Organ procurement and transplantation network. Health Resources and Services Administration [Online]. Available: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/need-continues-to-grow/. Accessed 7 Mar 2015

  6. Sack K (2014) Transplant brokers in Israel lure desperate kidney patients to Costa Rica. 17 Aug 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/17/world/middleeast/transplant-brokers-in-israel-lure-desperate-kidney-patients-to-costa-rica.html?_r=0. Accessed 7 Mar 2015

  7. Declaration of Istanbul Custodian Group. 5 July 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.declarationofistanbul.org/about-the-declaration/structure-and-content. Accessed 7 Mar 2015

  8. Invetech. Organovo: NovoGen MMX Bioprinter™ [Online]. Available: http://www.invetech.com.au/portfolio/life-sciences/3d-bioprinter-world-first-print-human-tissue/. Accessed 7 Mar 2015

  9. The Economist (2012) A third industrial revolution. The Economist, 21 Apr 2012

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zopf D, Mitsak A, Flanagan C, Wheeler M, Green G, Hollister S (2015) Computer aided-designed, 3-dimensionally printed porous tissue bioscaffolds for craniofacial soft tissue reconstruction. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg 152(1):57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fedorovich NE, Alblas J, Hennink WE, Cumhur Oner F, Dhert WJ (2011) Organ printing: the future of bone regeneration? Trends Biotechnol 29(12):601–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oxford Performance Materials (2014) Oxford Performance Materials receives FDA clearance for 3D printed OsteoFab® patient-specific facial device. Oxford Performance Materials. 19 Aug 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordpm.com/news/article/2014-08-19_oxford_performance_materials_receives_fda_clearance_for_3d_printed_osteofab_patient-specific_facial_device.php. Accessed 14 Mar 2015

  13. Ozbolat IT, Yu Y (2013) Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: challenges and future trends. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60(3):691–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Imani R, Hojjati Emami S, Fakhrzadeh H, Baheiraei N, Sharifi AM (2012) Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing. Biocell 36(1):37–45

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wichterle O, Drahoslav L (1960) Hydrophilic gels for biological use. Nature 185:117–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buwalda S, Boere KW, Djikstra PJ, Feijen J, Vermonden T, Kennink WE (2014) Hydrogels in a historical perspective: from simple networks to smart materials. J Control Release 190:254–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Barnatt C (2014) Bioprinting. ExplainingTheFuture.com, 7 Nov 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.explainingthefuture.com/bioprinting.html. Accessed 14 Mar 2015

  18. Liu J, Xie C, Dai X, Jin L, Zhou W, Lieber CM (2013) Multifunctional three-dimensional macroporous nanoelectronic networks for smart materials (author abstract). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(17):6694–6696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grainger DW (2013) Connecting drug delivery reality to smart materials design. Int J Pharm 454(1):521–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mostafalu P, Lenk W, Dokmeci M, Ziaie B, Khademhosseini A, Sonkusale S (2014) Wireless flexible smart bandage for continuous monitoring of wound oxygenation. Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS), 2014 IEEE, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tesla C (2014) Want a new organ? Press print—an introduction to the future of 3-D bioprinting. 28 Jul 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.tumotech.com/2014/07/28/want-a-new-organ-press-print-an-introduction-to-3-d-bioprinting/. Accessed 7 Mar 2015

  22. M2 Presswire (2013) 3D printing in medical and dental markets: an opportunity analysis and ten-year forecast. Research and Markets, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  23. Betz F (2012) Innovation and economy. In: Managing technological innovation. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 27–50

    Google Scholar 

  24. Harris W. How 3-D bioprinting works. Howstuffworks [Online]. Available: http://health.howstuffworks.com/medicine/modern-technology/3-d-bioprinting3.htm. Accessed 14 Mar 2015

  25. Solid Concepts Inc. Selective laser sintering. Solid Concepts Inc. [Online]. Available: https://www.solidconcepts.com/technologies/selective-laser-sintering-sls/. Accessed 14 Mar 2015

  26. Fictiv Inc. Selective laser sintering. Fictiv Inc. [Online]. Available: https://www.fictiv.com/resources/technology/sls-3d-printing-technology. Accessed 14 Mar 2015

  27. Shuai C, Gao C, Nie Y, Hu H, Zhou Y, Peng S (2011) Structure and properties of nano-hydroxypatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering with a selective laser sintering system. Nanotechnology 22(28):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. In’Tech Industries (2013) Advantages of sterelithography. In’Tech Industries Inc., 16 Dec 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.intechrp.com/advantages-of-stereolithography/. Accessed 14 Mar 2015

  29. Gauvin R, Chen Y-C, Lee JW, Soman P, Zorlutuna P, Nichol JW, Bae H, Chen S, Khademhosseini A (2012) Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography. Biomaterials 33(15):3824–3834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Tan KC, Teoh SH (2002) Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23(4):1169–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stratasys Ltd. How polyjet 3D printing works. Stratasys Ltd. [Online]. Available: http://www.stratasys.com/3d-printers/technologies/polyjet-technology. Accessed 14 Mar 2015

  32. 3D Additive Fabrication, Inc. (2015) 3D additive fabrication. 3D Additive Fabrication, Inc. [Online]. Available: http://www.3daddfab.com/technology/. Accessed 14 Mar 2015

  33. IBISWorld (2015) IBISWorld [Online]. Available: http://clients1.ibisworld.com.proxy.lib.pdx.edu/reports/us/industry/ataglance.aspx?indid=4428. Accessed 25 Feb 2015

  34. Chatsko M (2013) Fool.com. The Motley Fool, 24 Oct 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/10/24/organovos-3-biggest-opportunities-in-3-d-bioprinti.aspx. Accessed 20 Feb 2015

  35. Doyle K (2014) Bioprinting: from patches to parts. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News, 15 May 2014 [Online]. Available: http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/gen.34.10.02. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

  36. Wikipedia. Alginic acid. Wikimedia Foundation Inc. [Online]. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alginic_acid. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

  37. Mitchell B (2014) How the FDA regulates 3-D printed devices. Fedscoop, 27 Aug 2014 [Online]. Available: http://fedscoop.com/how-the-fda-regulates-3-d-printed-devices/. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

  38. Rivera J, van der Meulen R (2014) Bio 3D printing to ignite major ethics and regulation debate. Gartner, 29 Jan 2014 [Online]. Available http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2658315. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

  39. DAFOH [Online]. Available: http://www.dafoh.org/. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

  40. Bindel J (2013) Organ trafficking: a deadly trade. Telegraph Media Group, 1 Jul 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10146338/Organ-trafficking-a-deadly-trade.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

  41. US Department of Health and Human Services (2013) Paving the way for personalized medicine. FDA’s role in a new era of medical product development. Oct 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/PersonalizedMedicine/UCM372421.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

  42. Scott B (2014) 3-D printed devices pose layers of regulatory questions. Pharma MedTech InSights, Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C, 4 Nov 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.pharmamedtechinsights.com/2014/11/3-d-printed-devices-pose-layers-of-regulatory-questions/. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

  43. Xiao L (2014) TFDA tendering for report on the regulating of 3D printing and HITU in medical devices in US and Europe. BRANDWOOD BIOMEDICAL, 4 July 2014 [Online]. Available: http://brandwoodbiomedical.com/tfda-tendering-for-report-on-the-regulating-of-3d-printing-and-hitu-in-medical-devices-in-us-and-europe/. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

  44. Funk J (2013) 3D bio-printing; becoming economically feasible. National University of Singapore, 22 Nov 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.slideshare.net/Funk98/3d-bioprinting-becoming-economically-feasible. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

  45. Bentley TS, Hanson SG (2014) 2014 U.S. organ and tissue transplant cost estimates and discussion. 2 Dec 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.milliman.com/uploadedFiles/insight/Research/health-rr/1938HDP_20141230.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

  46. Gholipour B (2014) 3D tumors are printed in the lab. Purch, 10 Apr 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.livescience.com/44757-3d-printed-tumors.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2015

  47. Centola M, Rainer A, Spadaccio C, De Porcellinis S, Genovese J, Trombetta M (2010) Combining electrospinning and fused deposition modeling for the fabrication of a hybrid vascular graft. Biofabrication 2(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering and Technology, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA

    Minh Lu, Sowmini Sengupta, Yen Tran, David Wigen & Tugrul Daim

Authors
  1. Minh Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sowmini Sengupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yen Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Wigen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tugrul Daim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tugrul Daim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering and Technology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA

    Tugrul Daim

  2. Department of Engineering and Technology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA

    Jisun Kim

  3. Department of Engineering and Technology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA

    Kenny Phan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lu, M., Sengupta, S., Tran, Y., Wigen, D., Daim, T. (2017). Technology Management: Case of 3D Printing in Healthcare. In: Daim, T., Kim, J., Phan, K. (eds) Research and Development Management. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54537-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation