Advertisement

Three-Dimensional Glenohumeral Joint Kinematic Analyses from Asynchronous Biplane Fluoroscopy Using an Interpolation Technique

  • Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz
  • Joseph D. Mozingo
  • David R. HolmesIII
  • Kristin D. ZhaoEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

Biplane 3D–2D registration approaches have been used for measuring three-dimensional (3D), in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics. However, in clinical biplane systems, the X-ray images are acquired asynchronously, which introduces registration errors. The present study introduces an interpolation algorithm to improve the accuracy of image registration by generating synchronous fluoroscopy images. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was used to validate the interpolation technique for measuring glenohumeral joint kinematics. Our results show that the interpolated-synchronous biplane registration produces more accurate results than asynchronous biplane registration for shoulder kinematics. In comparison to RSA, the mean absolute kinematic error for the humerus was 0.18 mm and 0.4°; for the scapula, the error was 0.25 mm and 0.17°. The results of the interpolated-synchronous biplane registration are in the range of published results of other studies that have validated the 3D–2D registration technique at the shoulder using custom biplane (synchronous biplane) fluoroscopes. This approach will be particularly useful for improving the kinematic accuracy of high velocity activities using clinically available scanners.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Mark Hindal for his assistance with the study. We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Minnesota Partnership for Biotechnology and Medical Genomics (MNP IF #14.02).

References

  1. 1.
    Brainerd EL, Baier DB, Gatesy SM, Hedrick TL, Metzger KA, Gilbert SL, Crisco JJ (2010) X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM): precision, accuracy and applications in comparative biomechanics research. J Exp Zool 313:262–279Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bey MJ, Zauel R, Brock SK, Tashman S (2006) Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics. J Biomech Eng 128:604–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhu Z, Massimini DF, Wang G, Warner JJP, Li G (2012) The accuracy and repeatability of an automatic 2D-3D fluoroscopic image-model registration technique for determining shoulder joint kinematics. Med Eng Phys 34:1303–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li G, Suggs J, Hanson G, Durbhakula S, Johnson T, Freiberg A (2006) Three-dimensional tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics of a cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:395–402Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iaquinto JM, Tsai R, Haynor DR, Fassbind MJ, Sangeorzan BJ, Ledoux WR (2014) Marker-based validation of a biplane fluoroscopy system for quantifying foot kinematics. Med Eng Phys 36:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miranda DL, Schwartz JB, Loomis AC, Brainerd EL, Fleming BC, Crisco JJ (2011) Static and dynamic error of a biplanar videoradiography system using marker-based and Markerless tracking techniques. J Biomech Eng 133:121002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Massimini DF, Warner JJP, Li G (2011) Non-invasive determination of coupled motion of the scapula and humerus-an invitro validation. J Biomech 44:408–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cross JA, McHenry B, Schmidt TG (2015) Quantifying cross-scatter contamination in biplane fluoroscopy motion analysis systems. J Med Imaging 2:043503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu G, Van Der Helm FCT, Veeger HEJ, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade K, Wang X, Werner FW, Buchholz B (2005) ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion – part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech 38:981–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mu S (2007) JointTrack: an open-source, easily expandable program for skeletal kinematic measurement using model-image registration. http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0021784/00001 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knorlein BJ, Baier DB, Gatesy SM, Laurence-Chasen JD, Brainerd EL (2016) Validation of XMALab software for marker-based XROMM. J Exp Biol 219(Pt 23):3701–3711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Valenti M, de Momi E, Yu W, Ferrigno G, Akbari Shandiz M, Anglin C, Zheng G (2015) Fluoroscopy-based tracking of femoral kinematics with statistical shape models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(5):1–9Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lavallee S, Szeliski R, Brunie L (1993) Matching 3D smooth surfaces with their 2D projections using 3D distance maps. Geom Reason Percept Action 708:217–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fregly BJ, Rahman HA, Banks SA (2005) Theoretical accuracy of model-based shape matching for measuring natural knee kinematics with single-plane fluoroscopy. J Biomech Eng 127:692–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Banks SA, Hodge WA (1996) Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43:638–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chang CJ, Lin GL, Tse A, Chu HY, Tseng CS (2015) Registration of 2D C-arm and 3D CT images for a C-arm image-assisted navigation system for spinal surgery. Appl Bionics Biomech 2015:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz
    • 1
  • Joseph D. Mozingo
    • 1
  • David R. HolmesIII
    • 2
  • Kristin D. Zhao
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Assistive and Restorative Technology Laboratory, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Biomedical Imaging Resource, Department of Physiology and Biomedical EngineeringMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations