Skip to main content

Flood Risk in Polder Systems in Jakarta: Present and Future Analyses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Disaster Risk Reduction ((DRR))

Abstract

Polder systems in Jakarta have been implemented since 1965, but their development has been hindered by social and political issues. Currently, the government of Jakarta has started to consider polder system as seen in the Spatial Plan 2030. This chapter assesses the benefits/costs of the polder system in Jakarta under current conditions and under future scenario of climate change, land use change, and subsidence.

We calculate the benefits of each polder using Damagescanner-Jakarta, which is a flood risk model developed in previous study. Cost estimates are based on the costs of 22 dike projects in Java. We use flood design standards at 2, 5, 10, 25, and 50 years, as set out in the Minister of Public Works.

The results show that benefit/cost ratios greater than 1 exist at 21 out of 66 polders reducing 25% of risk under current conditions, and at 31 out of 66 polders reducing 52% of risk under the future scenario (for a return period of 2 years). Much of this risk reduction could be achieved in just 3 polders, namely Kapuk Muara, Penjaringan Junction, and Kapuk Polgar, in which 50% of the current risk could be reduced. The study also shows that operating 12 polders could reduce risk by 81% in the future, and polders with very high net benefits are located away from the coastline. Sensitivity testing using lower (4%) and higher (10%) discount rates show the number of net benefiting polders reduces as the discount rate increases in a predictable trend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abidin HZ, Andreas H, Gumilar I et al (2011) Land subsidence of Jakarta (Indonesia) and its relation with urban development. Nat Hazards 59:1753–1771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adhi Ksp R (2010) Banjir kanal Timur: karya anak bangsa. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Aichi M (2008) Coupled groundwater flow/deformation modeling for predicting land subsidence. In: STP D (ed) Groundwater management in Asian cities. Springer, Japan, pp 105–124

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Apel H, Thieken AH, Merz B, Blöschl G (2004) Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4(2):295–308. http://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-295-2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker JL (ed) (2012) Climate change, disaster risk, and the urban poor: cities building resilience for a changing world. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwer LM, Bubeck P, Wagtendonk AJ, Aerts JCJH (2009) Inundation scenarios for flood damage evaluation in polder areas. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9(6):1995–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwer LM, Bubeck P, Aerts JCJH (2010) Changes in future flood risk due to climate and development in a Dutch polder area. Glob Environ Chang 20(3):463–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budiyono Y, Aerts J, Brinkman J et al (2015) Flood risk assessment for delta mega-cities: a case study of Jakarta. Nat Hazards 75:389–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budiyono Y, Aerts JCJH, Tollenaar D, Ward PJ (2016) River flood risk in Jakarta under scenarios of future change. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 16:757–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caljouw M, Nas PJM, Pratiwo M (2005) Flooding in Jakarta: towards a blue city with improved water management. Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde/J Humanit Soc Sci Southeast Asia 161:454–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Deltares (2014) SOBEK. Hydrodynamics, rainfall runoff and real time control. User Manual. Deltares, Delft, available online at: http://content.oss.deltares.nl/delft3d/manuals/SOBEK_User_Manual.pdf

  • Direktorat Bina Program (2012) Penyusunan Data Pendukung dalam Pagu Usulan Kegiatan Bidang SDA. Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya (2014) Prosedur Operasional Baku (POB): Penyusunan Baseline Data 100–0-100 Program Peningkatan Kualitas Permukiman (P2KP), Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Diskominfomas DKI (2011) Kopro Banjir. In: Ensiklopedi Jakarta. http://www.jakarta.go.id/web/encyclopedia/detail/1590/Kopro-Banjir. Accessed 18 Apr 2016

  • DTR-DKI (2007) Peta tata guna lahan provinsi DKI Jakarta. Dinas Tata Ruang Pemerintah Propinsi DKI Jakarta, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Endo T, Kawashima S, Kawai M (2001) Historical review of development of land subsidence and its cease in Shitamachi Lowland, Tokyo. J Jpn Soc Eng Geol 42:74–87. doi:10.5110/jjseg.42.74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster S, Kneis D, Gocht M, Bronstert A (2005) Flood risk reduction by the use of retention areas at the Elbe River. Int J River Basin Manag 3(1):21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawan R (2010) Gagalnya Sistem Kanal: Pengendalian Banjir Jakarta dari Masa ke Masa. Penerbit Buku Kompas, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S (2014) Natural disasters and climate change. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel S, Frieler K, Warszawski L et al (2013) A trend-preserving bias correction – the ISI-MIP approach. Earth Syst Dynam 4:219–236. doi:10.5194/esd-4-219-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Rauberg J, Apel H, Disse M, Lindenschmidt K-E (2007) The effectiveness of polder systems on peak discharge capping of floods along the middle reaches of the Elbe River in Germany. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 11(4):1391–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change, contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman SN, Brinkhuis-Jak M, Kok M (2004) Cost benefit analysis and flood damage mitigation in the Netherlands. HERON 49(1):95–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadarsah SA, Syahputra EE, Nuraini TA, Aldrian E (2015) Kajian Curah Hujan Tinggi 9–10 Februari 2015 di DKI Jakarta, BADAN METEOROLOGI, KLIMATOLOGI, DAN GEOFISIKA [online]. Available from: http://www.bmkg.go.id/BMKG_Pusat/Publikasi/Artikel/KAJIAN_CURAH_HUJAN_TINGGI_9-10_FEBRUARI_2015_DI_DKI_JAKARTA.bmkg. Accessed 14 Apr 2016), n. d

  • Kind JM (2014) Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands: efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands. J Flood Risk Manag 7(2):103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn F, Asselman N, Van der Most H (2010) Compartmentalization: flood consequence reduction by splitting up large polder areas. J Flood Risk Manag 3:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kron W (2005) Flood risk = hazard x exposure x vulnerability. Water Int 30(1):58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechler R (2005) Cost-benefit analysis of natural disaster risk management in developing countries (Manual). Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer V, Haase D, Scheuer S (2008) Flood risk assessment in european river basins—concept, methods, and challenges exemplified at the mulde river. Integr Environ Assess Manag 5:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerwanto AS, Farchan M, Fauzi F, Suhardjono S, Iswari P, Schultz B, Suryadi FX, Mondeel H (2009) Urban polder guidelines Volume 4: case study banger polder, Semarang. Balitbang PU, Rijkwaterstaat, Unesco-IHE, Semarang

    Google Scholar 

  • PAM Jaya (2012) Pemenuhan kebutuhan Air Perpipaan Masyarakat Jakarta, Seminar Pembinaan dan Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya. Perkotaan, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • PAM Jaya (2015) Sejarah – Profil – PAM JAYA. In: PAM Jaya. http://www.pamjaya.co.id/profil/sejarah. Accessed 12 Apr 2016

  • Perda DKI Jakarta 1 (2012) Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Nomor 1 Tahun 2012 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah 2030, Lampiran I, Gambar 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Permenkeu 93/PMK.011 (2012) Tentang Sasaran Inflasi Tahun 2013, 2014, dan 2015 pasal 2(3)a

    Google Scholar 

  • Permen PU 12 (2014) Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 /PRT/M/2014 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem Drainase Perkotaan, Lampiran 1, Tabel 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Phien-wej N, Giao PH, Nutalaya P (2006) Land subsidence in Bangkok, Thailand. Eng Geol 82:187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Public Information Service (2013) Inflation: the inflation target. In: Bank Indonesia. http://www.bi.go.id/en/moneter/inflasi/bi-dan-inflasi/Contents/Penetapan.aspx. Accessed 20 Apr 2016

  • Ritzema H, Anh LQ, Kim BT (2011) Collaborative research to improve the water management in two polders in the Red River Delta in Vietnam, in knowledge in action. In: van Paassen A, van den Berg J, Steingröver E, Werkman R, Pedroli B (eds), Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 57–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth D, Warner J (2007) 2007, flood risk, uncertainty and changing river protection policy in the Netherlands: the case of ‘calamity polders’. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 98(4):519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Špačková O, Straub D (2015) Cost-benefit analysis for optimization of risk protection under budget constraints. Risk Anal 35:941–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (2011) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2011: revealing risk, redefining development. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (2013) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2013: from shared risk to shared value: the business case for disaster risk reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yus Budiyono .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Budiyono, Y., Marfai, M.A., Aerts, J., de Moel, H., Ward, P.J. (2017). Flood Risk in Polder Systems in Jakarta: Present and Future Analyses. In: Djalante, R., Garschagen, M., Thomalla, F., Shaw, R. (eds) Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia. Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54466-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics