Skip to main content

What Is Rhyparography? The Ambiguity of the Framing Device

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 709 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines framing devices in the history of Western art and literature. It shows how the ancient genre of rhyparography (the realist still-life or genre scene) reemerged in the margins or frames of devotional paintings as trompe l’oeil. Two scholarly readings of a key ‘gallery scene’ painting (The Cabinet of Corenlis van der Geest by van Haecht) are compared: firstly, Stoichita’s ‘tautegorical’ reading which emphasizes felicity and secondly Agamben’s ‘allegorical’ reading which emphasizes infelicity. These paradoxical readings of the framing device are shown to have intensified by the nineteenth century in a close reading of Balzac’s The Unknown Masterpiece.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See The Origin of German Tragic Drama (Benjamin 1998), in particular pp. 161–169.

  2. 2.

    ‘Pourbus’ is the name of the historical painter, while ‘Porbus’ is Balzac’s spelling of his romanticized character.

  3. 3.

    These temporal crossings were fruitful in ways that the writer never could have expected: ‘The sites of Balzac’s fictions are nearly always real places, but so transfigured that the house at 7, rue des Grands-Augustins in Paris, where the action of The Unknown Masterpiece begins, belongs as much if not more to his great character, the painter Frenhofer, as to Picasso, who took it for his studio in 1937, almost certainly because he believed it to have been where Frenhofer’s story was set’ (Danto, viii). Émile Bernard’s anecdote of Cézanne’s mute, emphatic self-identification with Frenhofer as well as Rivette’s La belle noiseuse (1991) testify to the story’s enduring resonances.

Bibliography

  • Agamben, G., 1994. The Man Without Content. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpers, S., 1976. Describe or Narrate: A problem in realistic representation. New Literary History 8, 15–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, E., 2003. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. 50th Anniversary Edition ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzac, H., 2001. The Unknown Masterpiece and Other Stories. Trans. Richard Howard. New York Review Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J., 1987. The Truth in Painting. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, J. E., 2005. Method in Madness: Control Mechanisms in the French Fantastic. Rodopi, Amsterdam and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M., 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau, O., 2003. Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G., 2003. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature. Merlin Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mieszkowski, J., 2004. Art forms, in: The Cambridge Companion to Walter Benjamin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.35–53

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nideffer, R., 2007. Game Engines as Embedded Systems, in: V. Vesna (Ed.), Database Aesthetics: Art in the Age of Information Overflow. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 211–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrey, S., 1992. Catherine Lescault and Louis-Philippe: Performative Representation in and around Balzac. The French Review 65, 733–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M., 1983. Noise. SubStance 12.3, 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoichita, V. I., 1997. The Self-Aware Image: An Insight into Early Modern Meta-Painting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., 2003. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Courier Dover Publications, Mineola, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G., 1993. Stanzas: Word and Phantasm in Western Culture. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, N., 2013. Looking at the Overlooked: Four Essays on Still-Life Painting. Reaktion Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jayemanne, D. (2017). What Is Rhyparography? The Ambiguity of the Framing Device. In: Performativity in Art, Literature, and Videogames. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54451-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics