Abstract
The pursuit of urban sustainability through smart growth programs, policies, and projects—the subject of this book—raises wider theoretical questions about how we should map the highly variegated ways in which regional planning strategies ultimately (re)shape urban form, in Greater Seattle or indeed any other city-regional environment. In particular, are the spaces that smart growth (helps to) make sustainable or unsustainable or in fact both at the same time, albeit unevenly across metropolitan space? This chapter discusses smart growth as a syncretic normative planning theory for regional (re)development, covering literatures that seek to define its key aspirational traits as well as its major territorial impacts in applied practice at various scales of governance. The chapter then turns to the concept of “intercurrence,” deployed from the field of American Political Development (APD), for theoretical inspiration. Intercurrence, it is argued, highlights the inevitable “abrading” of multiple orders at any given site, allowing us to reconsider the uneven geopolitical-economies of smart growth as a contested form of American territorial governance. Rather than wholly dismiss or uncritically celebrate smart growth through radical, liberal, or progressive ontologies, respectively, intercurrence foregrounds the multiplicities of consciously organized space.
How do we explain and evaluate the typical outcomes of planning so far?
—Susan Fainstein (2005, p. 121)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The Center for Tax Justice reports that between 2008–2012 the Boeing Corporation, for example, made total profits of $20.5 billion, but actually had a Federal income tax rate of −1.0 %. See http://www.ctj.org/corporatetaxdodgers/sorrystateofcorptaxes.pdf (p. 51).
- 2.
A Seattle-based example is Redmond, WA, the home of Microsoft, which has IZ policies. See: https://redmond.gov/PlansProjects/ComprehensivePlanning/RedmondCommunityIndicators/Choices/HousingAffordability/.
References
Allard, S., Burns, N., & Gamm, G. (1998). Representing urban interests: The local politics of state legislatures. Studies in American Political Development, 12(2), 267–302.
Almond, G. (1988). The return to the state. American Political Science Review, 82(3), 853–874.
Altshuler, A. (1965). The goals of comprehensive planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(2), 186–195.
Antonio, R. (2005). Max Weber in the Post-World War two US and after. Etica & Politica. Department of Philosophy, University of Trieste.
Barber, B. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bouie, J. (2015). Where Black Lives Matter began. Retrieved September 3, 2016, from http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/08/hurricane_katrina_10th_anniversary_how_the_black_lives_matter_movement_was.html.
Bouteligier, S. (2012). Global cities and networks for global environmental governance. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Brenner, N. (2009). Is there a politics of ‘urban’ development? Reflections on the US case. In R. Dilworth (Ed.), The city in American Political Development. New York: Routledge.
Burns, N., Evans, L., Gamm, G., & McConnaughy, C. (2009). Urban politics in the state arena. Studies in American Political Development, 23(1), 1–22.
Clavel, P. (1986). The progressive city. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Clavel, P. (2010). Activists in City Hall: The progressive response to the Reagan Era in Boston and Chicago. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.
Clavel, P., & Kleniewski, N. (1988). Space for progressive local policy: Examples from the United States and the United Kingdom. In J. Logan & T. Swanstrom (Eds.), Beyond the city limits: Urban policy and economic restructuring in comparative perspective. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Dahl, R. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dierwechter, Y. (2013). Smart growth and state territoriality. Urban Studies, 50(11), 2275–2292.
Dierwechter, Y. (2014). The spaces that smart growth makes: Sustainability, segregation, and residential change across greater Seattle. Urban Geography, 35(5), 691–714. doi:10.1080/02723638.2014.916905.
Dilworth, R. (Ed.). (2009). The city in American Political Development. New York: Routledge.
Domhoff, G. W., & Gendron, R. (2008). The leftmost city power and progressive politics in Santa Cruz. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Erie, S. (1990). Bringing the bosses back in: The Irish political machines and urban policy making. Studies in American Political Development, 4, 269–281. doi:10.1017/S0898588X0000095X.
Erie, S., & Mackenzie, S. (2009). The L.A. school and politics noir: Bringing the local state back in. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(5), 537–557.
Ethington, P. (1993). Urban constituencies, regimes, and policy innovation in the Progressive Era: An analysis of Boston, Chicago, New York City, and San Francisco. Studies in American Political Development, 7(2), 275–315. doi:10.1017/S0898588X00001115.
Fainstein, S. (2005). Planning theory and the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(2), 121–130. doi:10.1177/0739456x05279275.
Ford, K. (2010). The trouble with city planning: What New Orleans can teach us. New Haven: Yale.
Fortner, M. J. (2015). Straight, no chaser: Theory, history, and the muting of the urban state. Urban Affairs Review, online before print. doi:10.1177/1078087415608007
Gerring, J. (2003). APD from a methodological point of view. Studies in American Political Development, 17(1), 82–102. doi:10.1017/S0898588X03000026.
Glenn, B. (2004). The two schools of American Political Development. Political Studies Review, 2(2), 153–165. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9299.2004.00005.x.
Goetz, E. (2011). New deal ruins. Ithaca, NY: Cornell.
Gottschalk, M. (2000). “It’s the health-care costs, stupid!”: Ideas, institutions, and the politics of organized labor and health policy in the United States. Studies in American Political Development, 14(2), 234–252.
Hawley, E. (1966). The new deal and the problem of monopoly. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hodos, J. (2009). Against expectionalism: Intercurrence and intrgovernmental relations in Britain and the United States. In R. Dileorth (Ed.), The city in American Political Development. New York: Routledge.
Hunter, F. (1953). Community power structure: A study of decision makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Jonas, A. (2013). City-regionalism as a Contingent ‘Geopolitics of Capitalism’. Geopolitics, 18(2), 284–298. doi:10.1080/14650045.2012.723290.
Judd, D., Stoker, G., & Wolman, H. (1995). Theories of urban politics. London: Sage.
King County. (2015). King County equity and social justice strategic plan: Communty engagement report. Seattle: King County.
Kirwan Institute. (2010). The geography of opportunity: Mapping to promote equitable community development and fair housing in King County, WA. Columbus, OH: Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity.
Krasner, S. (1984). Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16(2), 223–246.
Lewis, P., & Neiman, M. (2009). Custodians of place: Governing the growth and development of cities. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Litman, T. (2011). Can smart growth policies conserve energy and redcue emissions? Center for Real Estate Quarterly Journal, 5(2), 21–30.
Logan, J., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lucas, J. (2015). Urban governance and the American political development approach. Urban Affairs Review. doi: 10.1177/1078087415620054 (First published date: 23 December 2015).
Lynn, L. (2008). What is a Neo-Weberian state? Reflections on a concept and its implications. Chicago. Retrieved from http://iss.fsv.cuni.cz/ISS-50-version1-080227_TED1_Lynn_Whats_neoweberian_state.pdf
Modarres, A. (2009). Immigrants are greening our cities, how about giving them a a break? New Geography. Retrieved from http://www.newgeography.com/content/00958-immigrants-are-%E2%80%98greening%E2%80%99-our-cities-how-about-giving-them-a-break
Molotch, H. L., & Logan, J. R. (2007). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place (20th anniversary ed., with a new pref. ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Nelson, A. C. (2013). Reshaping Metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Orren, K. (1986). Union politics and postwar liberalism in the United States, 1946–1979. Studies in American Political Development, 1, 215–252. doi:10.1017/S0898588X00000365.
Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (1996). Institutions and intercurrence: Theory building in the fullness of time Nomos XXXVII. In I. Shapiro & R. Hardin (Eds.), Political order. Nomos 38. New York: New York University Press.
Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (2004). The search for American Political Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rast, J. (2015). Urban regime theory and the problem of change. Urban Affairs Review, 51(1), 138–149. doi:10.1177/1078087414559056.
Revell, K. (1999). The road to Euclid v. Ambler: City planning, state-building, and the changing scope of the police power. Studies in American Political Development, 13(1), 50–145.
Rodgers, D. (2005). The search for American Political Development (review). Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 36(2), 275–276.
Rogers, S. (Ed.). (2009). Urban geography: Urban growth machine (vol. 12). Oxford: Elsevier.
Skocpol, T. (1985). Introduction. In P. Evans, R. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a new American state: The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877-1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skowronek, S. (2003). What’s wrong with APD. Studies in American Political Development, 17, 107–110.
Stone, C., & Whelan, R. (2009). Through the glass darkly: The once and future study of urban politics In R. Dilworth (Ed.), The city in American political development. New York: Routledge
Thrift, N., & Amin, A. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity.
Toly, N. (2008). Transnational municipal networks in climate politics: From global governance to global politics. Globalizations, 5(3), 341–356.
Tretter, E. (2016). Shadows of a sunbelt city. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Warner, M., & Clifton, J. (2013). Marketization, public services and the city: The potential for Polanyian counter movements. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(1), 45–61. doi:10.1093/cjres/rst028.
Weir, M. (2011). Creating justice for the poor in the new metropolis. In C. Hayward & T. Swanstrom (Eds.), Justice and the American metropolis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Winchell, D., & Ramsey, G. (2013). Indigenous rural renewal in the Inland Pacific Northwest: The emergence of American Indian tribes in regional economic development. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 8(3), 174–196.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dierwechter, Y. (2017). Theory: A City-Regional Geography of Multiple Orders. In: Urban Sustainability through Smart Growth. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54448-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54448-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54447-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54448-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)