Skip to main content

Relationship Between Sustainable Leadership and Organizational Trust: Empirical Evidence from Private Higher Education Institutions in Syria

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modernizing Academic Teaching and Research in Business and Economics

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

The purpose of this research paper is to develop a theoretical model of sustainable leadership and organizational trust in Higher Education environment in Syria. The model assesses academic and administrative staff perception of outstanding leadership behaviors and examines its relationship with perceived organizational trust in the field of higher education institutions in Syria. A theoretical model is established, clarifying the significance of selection of sustainable leadership behaviors and members’ trust in their co-workers. Research Methodology, measurement, empirical testing and application of the theoretical model is investigated. A quantitative approach is employed to design a self-administered questionnaire survey. Back translation is administered to ensure better validity of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis is conducted to examine the validity of sustainable leadership and trust in co-workers scales. Cronbach alpha Reliability test shows strong internal consistency and significance. Higher Education industry is investigated in this research study selecting a convenience sample from Higher Education institutions. A bivariate correlation analysis is conducted to examine the association between the two variables. Results of research study indicates a positive and significant relationship between sustainable leadership and trust in coworkers. However the association is not strong. The managerial implication of the research study recommends application and adoption of sustainable leadership behaviors among functional, mid and senior levels of managers and academics in management positions in higher education institutions. The limitation of research is mainly indicated in the sample size and measurement scales of sustainable leadership and organizational trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Joo, M. T. H., Hee, T. F., & Piaw, C. Y. (2014). Leadership orientations of an educational leader in a private university in Malaysia. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114(1990), 681–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al Chibani, W., & Al Chibani, P. H. (2013). Leadership styles of school principals in Lebanon: Multiple case study. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 174–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sotirofski, K. (2011). Comparing the educational leadership roles of Albanian and Turkish higher education institutions administrators. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3560–3565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahdi, O. R., & Almsafir, M. K. (2014). The role of strategic leadership in building sustainable competitive advantage in the academic environment. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ayoubi, R., Al-ahmar, A., & Ahmar-dakna, S. (2009, November). The national project or the national programme: An evaluation of tempus programme contribution to the development of the higher education sector in Syria. Stuttgart: University Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 53(1977), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tansley, C., & Newell, S. (2007). Project social capital, leadership and trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(4), 350–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sendjaya, S., & Pekerti, A. (2010). Servant leadership as antecedent of trust in organizations. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 31(7), 643–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2010). The impact of positivity and transparency on trust in leaders and their perceived effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 350–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Erkutlu, H., & Chafra, J. (2013). Effects of trust and psychological contract violation on authentic leadership and organizational deviance. Management Research Review, 36(9), 828–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillespie, N. A., & Mann, L. (2004). Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 588–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Joseph, E. E., & Winston, B. E. (2005). A correlation of servant leadership, leader trust, and organizational trust. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26(1/2), 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan, S. C. H., & Mak, W. (2014). The impact of servant leadership and subordinates’ organizational tenure on trust in leader and attitudes. Personnel Review, 43(2), 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hargreaves, A. (2007). Sustainable leadership and development in education: Creating the future, conserving the past. European Journal of Education, 42(2), 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lambert, S. (2012). The perception and implementation of sustainable leadership strategies in further education colleges. The Journal of Leadership Education, 11(2), 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003). The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader. Training and Development Journal, 40(7), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bennis, W., & Biederman, W. (2009, November). The essential Bennis. Harvard Business Review, 465.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yammarino, F. J., Spangler, W. D., & Bass, B. M. (1993). Transformational leadership and performance: A longitudinal investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 4(1), 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1995a). The leadership challenge: How to keep getting extraordinary things done in organizations (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Conger, J. A., & Hunt, J. G. (1999). Charismatic and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Strange, J. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). The origins of vision: Effects of reflection, models, and analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 121–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. House, R. J. (1999). Weber and the neo-charismatic leadership paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(4), 563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1994). SIOI ideology provides the glue together through time. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ergeneli, A., Gohar, R., & Temirbekova, Z. (2007). Transformational leadership: Its relationship to culture value dimensions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(6), 703–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zaccaro, S. J., & Banks, D. (2001). Leadership, vision, and organizational effectiveness. In S. J. Zaccaro & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), The nature of organizational leadership: Understanding the performance imperatives confronting today’s leaders (pp. 181–218). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  29. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The globe study of 62 societies (pp. 301–340). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 857–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tolle, E. F. (1988). Management team building: Yes but! Engineering Management International, 4, 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3–29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a ‘big five’ in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599. doi:10.1177/1046496405277134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Cognitive psychology and team training: Training shared mental models and complex systems. Human Factors Bulletin, 33, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mittal, R., & Dorfman, P. W. (2012). Servant leadership across cultures. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 555–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kouzes, B., & Posner, J. (1995). The leadership challenge. Nursing Standard, 24(51), 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Strange, J. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). The origins of vision. Charismatic versus ideological leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 343–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dickson, M. W., Den Hartog, D. N., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 729–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dalati, S. (2015). Leadership and sustainable entrepreneurship: Classical approaches and contemporary contexts. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 2(4), 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2014). Business research methods (12th ed., p. 792). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2010). Business research methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zikmund, W., Babin, B., Carr, J., & Griffin, M. (2009). Business research methods. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serene Dalati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dalati, S. (2017). Relationship Between Sustainable Leadership and Organizational Trust: Empirical Evidence from Private Higher Education Institutions in Syria. In: Marx Gómez, J., Aboujaoude, M., Feghali, K., Mahmoud, T. (eds) Modernizing Academic Teaching and Research in Business and Economics. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54419-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics