Skip to main content

A Dynamic Model for the Next Generation of Research on Teacher Education for Inclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Inclusive Learning and Educational Equity ((ILEE,volume 2))

Abstract

In this chapter we consider the importance of, and ways to conceptualize, a more robust agenda for the next generation of research on teacher education for inclusion. Research on teacher education for inclusion, while increasingly available in the literature, is fragmented – primarily because models have yet to be developed to account for how research on both the structures and the content of teacher education for inclusion contribute to fully understanding how best to prepare teachers to serve all students well. Developing such a model needs to take into account the complexity and context in which teacher education for inclusion is practiced within and across nations so that new questions emerge to broaden and deepen inquiry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E. B., & Waitoller, F. R. (2011). Inclusive education: Examining equity on five continents. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Ludlow, L., Grundnoff, L., & Aitken, G. (2014). The challenge and promise of complexity theory for teacher education research. Teachers College Record, 116, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danforth, S., & Naraian, S. (2015). This new field of inclusive education: Beginning a dialogue on conceptual foundations. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53(1), 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. (2010). Teacher education for inclusion – International literature review. Odense: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florian, L. (2014). Preparing teachers to work with students with disabilities: An international perspective. In P. T. Sindelar, E. D. McCray, M. T. Brownell, & B. Lignugaris-Kraft (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 47–64). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlin, C. (Ed.). (2010). Teacher education for inclusion: Changing paradigms and innovative approaches. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollins, E. R., & Guzman, M. T. (2005). Research on preparing teachers for diverse populations. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 477–548). Mahwah: American Educational Research Association and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J. J. (2012). Complex relationships between multicultural education and special education: An African American perspective. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamens, M. W. (2007). Learning about co-teaching: A collaborative student teaching experience for pre-service teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30, 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamens, M., & Casale-Giannola, D. (2004). The role of the student teacher in the co-taught classroom. The Teacher Educator, 40(1), 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opertti, R., Walker, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Inclusive education: From targeting groups and schools to achieving quality as the core of EFA. In L. Florian (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of special education (2nd ed., pp. 149–169). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pugach, M. C., Blanton, L. P., & Correa, V. I. (2011). A historical perspective on the role of collaboration in teacher education reform. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugach, M. C., Blanton, L. P., & Florian, L. (2012). Unsettling conversations: Diversity and disability in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 235–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugach, M. C., Blanton, L. P., & Boveda, M. (2014a). Working together: Research on the preparation of general education and special education teachers for inclusion and collaboration. In P. T. Sindelar, E. D. McCray, M. T. Brownell, & B. Lignugaris-Kraft (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 143–160). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugach, M. C., Gomez-Najarro, J. & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2014b, April). Long overdue: Rethinking research on social justice in teacher education from an intersectionality perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting, American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugach, M. C., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Gomez-Najarro, J. (2014c). Finally making good on the promise of qualitative research in special education? Remedial and Special Education, 35, 340–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, M., Lee, H., & McKenna, J. W. (2016). Special education and general education preservice teachers’ co-teaching experiences: A comparative synthesis of qualitative research. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trainor, A. A., & Leko, M. (2014). Qualitative special education research: Purpose, rigor, and contribution. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 263–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, P. (2013). Comparative outcomes of two instructional models for students with learning disabilities: Inclusion with co-teaching and solo-taught special education. Journal of Special Educational Needs, 13, 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villegas, A. M. (2012). Collaboration between multicultural and special teacher educators: Pulling together the threads in the conversation. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 286–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda P. Blanton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blanton, L.P., Pugach, M.C. (2017). A Dynamic Model for the Next Generation of Research on Teacher Education for Inclusion. In: Florian, L., Pantić, N. (eds) Teacher Education for the Changing Demographics of Schooling. Inclusive Learning and Educational Equity, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54389-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54389-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54388-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54389-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics