Advertisement

Community-Based Sanctions: Probation and Post-release Supervision

  • Peter C. Kratcoski
  • Susan Crittenden
  • Susan Worstall
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter defines probation and traces the origins of probation from its early development to the present time. The organization and operations of municipal, state, and federal probation in the United States are explained. The role of the probation officer and an explanation of the ways the role of the probation officer has changed are examined. The post-release process (parole) is described, and the use of evidence-based assessment instruments in probation and parole is considered.

Keywords

Probation Pretrial supervision Municipal court probation US legal system State courts Federal courts Deferred prosecution Diversion Presentence investigation Risk-needs assessment General conditions of probation Special conditions of probation Probation officer Community supervision officer Community residential centers Post-incarceration supervision Parole Alcohol and drug abuse residential centers Deferred adjudication Revocation of community supervision State jail offenders Sentencing guidelines Split sentence 

References

  1. Alexander, M., & Van Benschoten, S. (2008). The evolution of supervision in the federal probation system. Federal Probation, 72(2), 15–21.Google Scholar
  2. Burns Jr., H. (1975). Corrections organization and administration. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  3. Caplan, J. (2007). What factors affect parole: A review of the research. Federal Probation, 71, 16–19.Google Scholar
  4. Center for Criminal Justice Research. (2011). Ohio risk assessment system-supplemental reentry tool (ORAS-SRT) scoring guide (pp. 5–15). Cincinnati, OH: School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, T., Cook, D., & Lowenkamp, C. (2016). The supervision of low-risk federal offenders: How the low-risk policy has changed federal supervision practices without compromising community safety. Federal Probation, 2016, 3–11.Google Scholar
  6. Hsich, M., Hafoka, M., Woo, Y., Van Wormer, J., Stohr, M., & Hemmens, C. (2015). Probation officer roles: A statutory analysis. Federal Probation, 79, 20–37.Google Scholar
  7. Hughes, J. M., & Henkel, K. S. (1997). The federal probation and pretrial services system since 1975: An era of growth and change. Federal Probation, 79(3), 48–52.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, J. L., & Baber, L. M. (2015). State of the system: Federal probation and pretrial services. Federal Probation, 79(2), 34–40.Google Scholar
  9. Kratcoski, P., & Walker, D. (1978). Criminal justice in America: Process and issues. Glenville, IL: Scott-Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
  10. Kratcoski, P., & Walker, D. (1984). Criminal justice in America: Process and issues (2nd ed.). New York: Random House, Inc..Google Scholar
  11. Kratcoski, P., Randol, B., & Block, L. (2015). United States legal system. In D. Low & D. K. Das (Eds.), Trends in the judiciary (pp. 177–200). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  12. Miller, J. (2015). Contemporary modes of probation officer supervision: The triumph of the “synthetic” officer? Justice Quarterly, 32(2), 314–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Steiner, B., Purkiss, M., Kifer, M., Roberts, E., & Hemmens, C. (2004). Legally prescribed functions of adult and juvenile probation officers: Worlds apart? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 39(4), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Texas Government Code 76.002. (2005). Retrieved October 15, 2016, from www.codes.findlaw.com/tx/government-code/gov-t-ect-76-002.hlml
  15. United States Probation and Pretrial System. (2016). Retrieved October 15, 2016, from www.njpt.uscourts.gov/psaprobsystem.pdf
  16. United States Sentencing Commission. (2015). Federal sentencing: The basics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  17. United States Sentencing Commission Guideline Manual. (2015). Retrieved October 15, 2016, from www.ussc.gov/guidelines/2015-guidelines-manual/archive

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter C. Kratcoski
    • 1
  • Susan Crittenden
    • 2
  • Susan Worstall
    • 3
  1. 1.Kent State UniversityKentUSA
  2. 2.Dallas County Community Supervision and Corrections DepartmentDallasUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Pretrial and Probation Department (Retired)AkronUSA

Personalised recommendations