Applying Restorative Justice Models in the Correctional Process

  • Peter C. Kratcoski
Chapter

Abstract

The concept restorative justice implies that the criminal offender, the victim, and the community should all be involved in the offender’s rehabilitation process. The offender must be held responsible for the harm caused to an individual and the community and compensate the victim and the community in a manner that is reasonable and just. The victim of crime has an opportunity to participate in the criminal justice process by providing input during the offender’s trial and sentencing and also by being compensated for physical, psychological, or property harm. The community participates in the restorative justice process by assisting in integrating the offender back into the community as a functioning member. In this chapter, several of the models used in restorative justice, including mediation, diversion, family counseling, and the application of restorative justice in community and institutional corrections, will be described.

Keywords

Restorative justice Balanced model Diversion Mediation Family group conferencing Restorative conferencing Compensation Restitution 

References

  1. Bazemore, G. (1997). What’s “new” about the balanced approach? Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 48(1), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and restorative justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Braithwaite, J. (2004). Restorative justice and de-professionalization. Good Society, 13(1), 28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Civil Justice Reform Act Plan W.D. MO. (1992).Google Scholar
  5. Feld, B. (1999). Bad kids. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act. (1974). As amended (Public Law 93-414, section 223 {a}{23}).Google Scholar
  7. Kovach, K. (1994). Mediation: Principles and practices. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co..Google Scholar
  8. Kratcoski, P. (2012). Juvenile justice administration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kratcoski, P., Ammar, N., & Dahlgren, D. (2004). Police diversion of delinquent youth: An assessment of programs. In P. C. Kratcoski (Ed.), Correctional counseling and treatment (5th ed., pp. 156–184). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  10. McCold, P. (2004). An experiment in police-based restorative justice: The Bethlehem (PA) project. In P. C. Kratcoski (Ed.), Correctional counseling and treatment (5th ed., pp. 15–29). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  11. McGarrell, E. (2001). Juvenile Justice Bulletin (5th ed.pp. 1–11). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  12. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (1998). Guide for implementing the balanced and restorative justice model. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Report.Google Scholar
  13. Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency. Chapter 6.Google Scholar
  14. Umbreit, M. (1995). Mediation of criminal conflict: An assessment of programs in four Canadian provinces. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota School of Social Work.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter C. Kratcoski
    • 1
  1. 1.Kent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations