Abstract
Medicine including surgical techniques has been flourishing since ancient societies. All efforts have aimed to increase patient’s survival in addition to quality of life. Lately, along with the increased popularity of laparoscopic surgery, minimally invasive surgical techniques have taken its place in surgical practice for various type of procedures, owing to several advantages such as rapid recovery, less pain as well as improved cosmetic outcomes [1]. However, for treatment of malignant diseases, safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has remained under debate for years until recently. With the increasing amount of evidence and surgical experience, MIS is now commonly favored practice for oncological surgery that made of more sophisticated processes compared to those of surgery for benign diseases [2]. Whereas MIS represents a developing trend, some limitations faced by surgeon during conventional laparoscopy led surgeons for innovative solutions and robotic technology has been introduced with many advantages including articulated instruments, three-dimensional images, and tremor filtering. Although several robotic systems have been developed, its popularity has increased just after the approval of Da Vinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, California, USA), many robotic systems have been started being used worldwide [3].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arezzo A. The past, the present, and the future of minimally invasive therapy in laparoscopic surgery: a review and speculative outlook. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2014;23(5):253–60. doi:10.3109/13645706.2014.900084.
Son T, Hyung WJ. Laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery: current evidence and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(2):727–35. doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.727.
Son T, Kwon IG, Hyung WJ. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer treatment: current status and future perspectives. Gut Liver. 2014;8(3):229–36. doi:10.5009/gnl.2014.8.3.229.
Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer. 2011;11(2):69–77. doi:10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.69.
Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4(2):146–8.
Antonakis PT, Ashrafian H, Isla AM. Laparoscopic gastric surgery for cancer: where do we stand? World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(39):14280–91. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14280.
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2016;20(1):1–19. doi:10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4.
Guner A, Hyung WJ. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer. Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2014;30(1):1–9. doi:10.5152/ucd.2014.2607.
Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Kim HI, Obama K, Son T, Noh SH. Minimizing hepatic trauma with a novel liver retraction method: a simple liver suspension using gauze suture. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(12):3939–45. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1788-9.
Kim HI, Hyung WJ, Lee CR, Lim JS, An JY, Cheong JH, Choi SH, Noh SH. Intraoperative portable abdominal radiograph for tumor localization: a simple and accurate method for laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(3):958–63. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1288-3.
Kanaya S, Kawamura Y, Kawada H, Iwasaki H, Gomi T, Satoh S, Uyama I. The delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: analysis of the initial 100 consecutive procedures of intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(4):365–71. doi:10.1007/s10120-011-0054-0.
Deng Y, Zhang Y, Guo TK. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis based on seven randomized controlled trials. Surg Oncol. 2015;24(2):71–7. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2015.02.003.
Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):28–35. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000001346.
Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Takagi M, Yoshikawa T, Fukagawa T, Terashima M, Misawa K, Teshima S, Koeda K, Nunobe S, Fukushima N, Yasuda T, Asao Y, Fujiwara Y, Sasako M. Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer. 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1007/s10120-016-0646-9
Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Xue Y, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Chen P, Liu H, Zheng C, Liu F, Yu J, Li Z, Zhao G, Chen X, Wang K, Li P, Xing J, Li G. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(12):1350–7. doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.7215.
Kim KH, Kim SH, Kim MC. How much progress has been made in minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Korea?: a viewpoint from Korean prospective clinical trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93(28):e233. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000233.
Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg. 2009;249(6):927–32. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000351688.64999.73.
Yang Y, Wang G, He J, Wu F, Ren S. Robotic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;143(1):105–14. doi:10.1007/s00432-016-2240-2.
Wang G, Jiang Z, Zhao J, Liu J, Zhang S, Zhao K, Feng X, Li J. Assessing the safety and efficacy of full robotic gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(4):397–404. doi:10.1002/jso.24146.
Caruso S, Patriti A, Marrelli D, Ceccarelli G, Ceribelli C, Roviello F, Casciola L. Open vs robot-assisted laparoscopic gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study. Int J Med Rob Comput Assisted Surg. 2011;7(4):452–8. doi:10.1002/rcs.416.
Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, Kim YW, Lee HJ, Ryu KW, Park JM, An JY, Kim MC, Park S, Song KY, Oh SJ, Kong SH, Suh BJ, Yang DH, Ha TK, Kim YN, Hyung WJ. Multicenter prospective comparative study of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):103–9. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001249.
Park JM, Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, Kim YW, Lee HJ, An JY, Kim MC, Park S, Song KY, Oh SJ, Kong SH, Suh BJ, Yang DH, Ha TK, Hyung WJ, Ryu KW. Who may benefit from robotic gastrectomy?: a subgroup analysis of multicenter prospective comparative study data on robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(12):1944–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.012.
Son T, Lee JH, Kim YM, Kim HI, Noh SH, Hyung WJ. Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(9):2606–15. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3511-0.
Kim KM, An JY, Kim HI, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH. Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2012;99(12):1681–7. doi:10.1002/bjs.8924.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guner, A., Hyung, W.J. (2017). Minimally Invasive Surgery of Gastric Cancer. In: Cuesta, M. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery for Upper Abdominal Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54301-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54301-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54300-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54301-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)