Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Upper Abdominal Cancer pp 3–8Cite as

Advantages of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Upper Abdominal Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 873 Accesses

Abstract

The postoperative surgical advantages of the Minimally Invasive Surgical (MIS) approach in comparison with Open approach in Upper Gastrointestinal Oncology concern: (1) The stress and immune responses, (2) the surgical intervention, (3) the postoperative short-term effects and morbidity, (4) the postoperative Quality of Life, and (5) the oncological consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1:144–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lacy AM, Garcia Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand S, et al. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The COLOR cancer laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, et al. Short term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic assisted vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomised trial. JAMA. 2002;287:321–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu FPK, Sietses C, von Blomberg BME, et al. Systemic and peritoneal inflammatory response after laparoscopic or conventional colon resection in cancer patients: a prospective, randomised trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:147–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harmon GD, Senagore AJ, Kilbride MJ, Warzynski MJ. Interleukin-6 response to laparoscopic and open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:754–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwenk W, Jacobi C, Mansmann U, et al. Inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections-results of a prospective randomized trial. Langebecks Arch Surg. 2000;385:2–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Veenhof AA, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM, et al. The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal acncer: a randomized trial. Int J Color Dis. 2011;26:53–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001;322:473–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kehlet H. Fast track colorectal surgery. Lancet. 2008;371:791–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence based surgical care and evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:189–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollemann MW, et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA study). Ann Surg. 2011;254:868–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, vd Pas MH, et al. Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012;255:216–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cuesta MA, Weijs TJ, Bleys RL, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP, Straatman J, Osugi H, van der Peet DL. A new concept of the anatomy of the thoracic oesophagus: the meso-oesophagus. Observational study during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2576–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Roig Garcia J, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JHG, Hollemann MW, de Lange ESM, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised control trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huscher CGS, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Di Paola M, Recher A, Ponzano C. Laparosocpic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer. Five year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg. 2005;241(1):232–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Jansma EP, van der Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes and completeness of resection: surgical techniques in gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2016;40:148–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martínez-Ramos D, Miralles-Tena JM, Cuesta MA, Escrig-Sos J, van der Peet DL, Hoashi JS, Salvador-Sanchis JL. Laparoscopy versus open surgery for advances and resectable gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011;103(3):133–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Gisbertz SS, Hartemink KJ, Alonso Poza A, Weitz J, Mateo Vallejo F, Akhtar K, Diez del Val I, Roig Garcia J, van der Peet DL. Surgical techniques, open versus minimally invasive gastrectomy after chemotherapy (STOMACH trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Haverkamp L, Brenkman HJF, Seesing MFJ, Gisbert SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Wijnhoven BPL, van Lanschot JJB, de Steur WO, Hartgrink HH, Stoot JHMB, Hulsewé KWE, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, Rütter JE, Kouwenhoven EA, van Det MJ, van der Peet DL, Daams F, Draaisma WA, Broeders IAMJ, van Stel HF, Lacle MM, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer, a multicenter prospectively randomized controlled trial (LOGICA trial). BMC Cancer. 2015;15:556.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Qin H, Qiu J, Zhao Y, Pan G, Zeng Y. Does minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method. A meta-analysis of retrospective studies. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e104274.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Nakamura M, Nakashima H. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and duodenopancreatectomy: is it worthwhile? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:421–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boggi U, Ugo B, Gabriella A, Fabio V, Fabio C, De Lio N, Vittorio P, Linda B, Mario B, Stefano S, Franco M. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc. 2014;29:9–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. De Rooij T, Besselink M, Shamali A, Butturini G, Busch O, Troisi R, Fernández-Cruz L, Topal B, Dagher I, Bassi C, Abu Hilal M. Pan-European survey on laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18:e852–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Riviere D, Gurusamy KS, Kooby DA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD011391. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011391.pub2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pancreatic head and peri-ampullary cancer laparoscopic vs. open surgical treatment trial (PLOT). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT.

  29. Bonjer HJ, Deijnen CL, Abis GA, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Quality of life and late complications after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy. results of a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2015;39:1986–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. The ORANGE II plus trial. Open versus laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. Clinical trials gov. NCT01441856, RM van Dam, updated Sept 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chen J, Bai T, Zhang Y, et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review. J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:20679–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Miguel A. Cuesta (Emeritus Professor)

Authors
  1. Miguel A. Cuesta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel A. Cuesta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Miguel A. Cuesta

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cuesta, M.A. (2017). Advantages of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Upper Abdominal Surgery. In: Cuesta, M. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery for Upper Abdominal Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54301-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54301-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54300-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54301-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation