Skip to main content

Social Capital and the LEADER Approach: A Statistical Method for the Evaluation of Local Action Groups

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Capital and Local Development

Abstract

This chapter describes the methodology and statistical foundations adopted for quantifying and qualifying the endowment of social capital in Local Actions Groups of the EU LEADER initiative. Specifically, the chapter presents the proposed evaluation method, including the criteria and techniques used to create, normalise and aggregate indicators into indexes of structural and cognitive-normative social capital and rural governance. Consequently, it specifies the data collection system, the selection of case study areas and the sampling design adopted in the survey carried out across the selected case study areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In statistics, normalisation can have multiple meanings. In simple terms, normalisation of ratings identifies the adjustment of values measured on different scales to a notionally common scale. In more complex cases, normalisation can refer to sophisticated adjustments where the intention is to bring the entire probability distributions of adjusted values into alignment (Dodge, 2003).

  2. 2.

    Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) problems include five components: (i) Goal, (ii) Decision maker or group of decision makers with opinions (preferences), (iii) Decision alternatives, (iv) Evaluation criteria (interests) and (v) Outcomes or consequences associated with alternative/interest combination (Natural Resources Leadership Institute, 2011).

References

  • Arabatzis, G., Aggelopoulos, S., & Tsiantikoudis, S. (2010). Rural development and LEADER+ in Greece: evaluation of Local Action Groups. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 8(1), 302–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, Ö., Crona, B., & Ernstson, H. (2006). Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology and Society, 11(2), r2. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/resp2/ Accessed 1 June 2016.

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Jones, C., & Everett, M. G. (1998). Network measures of social capital. Connections, 21(2), 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. (2002). Measuring social capital: adding field experimental methods to the analytical toolbox. In J. Isham, T. Kelly, & S. Ramaswamy (Eds.), Social Capital and Economic Development: Well-Being in Developing Countries (pp. 119–137). Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchi, C., Grando, S., & Sabatini, F. (2008). Campagne in sviluppo. Capitale sociale e comunità rurali in Europa. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiesi, A. M. (1999). L’analisi dei reticoli. Milano: FrancoAngeli Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Devitiis, B., Lopolito, A., Maietta, O. W., & Sisto, R. (2009). Innovazione e capitale sociale: il ruolo delle relazioni nelle imprese di trasformazione dei prodotti di agricoltura biologica. Rivista di Economia Agraria, 64(3–4), 291–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Y. (2003). The Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • EENRD. (2010). Working paper on Capturing impacts of Leader and of measures to improve the Quality of Life in rural areas. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/eval/wp-leader_en.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2016.

  • European Commission. (2012). Synthesis of mid-term evaluation of rural development programmes 2007–2013. Final report. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/evaluation/rural-development-reports/2012/synthesis-mte-2007-2013/fulltext_en.pdf. Accessed 25 August 2016.

  • Glaeser, E. G., Laibson, D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65, 811–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1976). Network sampling: some first steps. American Journal of Sociology, 81(May), 1287–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Woolcock, M., & Jones, V. N. (2004). Measuring social capital: an integrated questionnaire. World Bank Working Paper no. 18. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, T., & Côté, S. (2001). The Well-Being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital. Education and Skills. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, M. (2014). Imputation of missing network data. In R. Alhajj & J. Rokne (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining (Vol. 2,pp. 707–715). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, K. (2008). Explaining policy outputs. The possibility to combine social network analysis with other methodologies. Paper presented at the 4th UK Social Network Conference, 18–20 July 2008, University of Greenwich, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, S. R. (2014). Beyond the existence proof: ontological conditions, epistemological implications, and in-depth interview research. Quality & Quantity, 48, 387–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardone, G., Sisto, R., & Lopolito, A. (2010). Social capital in the LEADER Initiative: a methodological approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(1), 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Leadership Institute. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis. https://www.ncsu.edu/nrli/decision-making/MCDA.php. Accessed 1 June 2016.

  • Papadopoulou, E., Papalexiou, C., & Hasaganas, N. (2012). Participatory evaluation of rural development programmes: a qualitative approach in the case of modernisation of agricultural holdings in Greece. Regional Science Inquiry Journal, IV(1), 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisani, E., & Laidin, C. (2016). Evaluating project networks in the EU-funded LEADER – Community-led Local Development (CLLD) across Europe: a proposal for Social Network Analysis. Paper presented at the 28th Annual EAEPE Conference 2016 Industrialisation, socio-economic transformation and Institutions, 3–5 November 2016. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisani, E., Secco, L., Da Re, R., & Franceschetti, G. (2014). Social capital and LEADER approach: from theory to empirics. Rivista di Economia Agraria, 2(3), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2013). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secco, L., Da Re, R., Pettenella, D. M., & Gatto, P. (2014). Why and how to measure forest governance at local level: a set of indicators. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokman, F. N. (2004). What binds us when with whom? Content and structure in social network analysis. Portorož, Slovenia: extended version of keynote at the SUNBELT XXIV International Social Network Conference. 13 May 2004. http://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/14560752/What%20binds%20us%20when%20with%20whom.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2016.

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis, Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesinger, G. (2007). The importance of social capital in rural development, networking and decision-making in rural areas. Journal of Alpine Research/Revue de géographie alpine, 95(4), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2002). Social Capital Assessment Tool (SOCAT). http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTSOCIALCAPITAL/Resources/Social-Capital-Assessment-Tool–SOCAT-/annex1.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Da Re .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Da Re, R., Castiglioni, M., Burlando, C. (2017). Social Capital and the LEADER Approach: A Statistical Method for the Evaluation of Local Action Groups. In: Pisani, E., Franceschetti, G., Secco, L., Christoforou, A. (eds) Social Capital and Local Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54276-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54277-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics