Skip to main content

Metaphysical Plays of Domination and Freedom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Byron's Nature
  • 364 Accesses

Abstract

The metaphysical plays allow Byron a chance to stage the dominant epistemology of hierarchical dualism and speculate about its psychosocial effects. Manfred, Cain, and Japhet all occupy worlds that have been structured by dualism. Manfred and Cain have both internalized dualistic epistemology which teaches them to despise their “mixed essence” of mind-body. Through the course of their dramas, both protagonists come to understand the power of human vulnerability and value the shared fragility that connects them to the earth. In contrast, Japhet already understands how shared fragility unites all living creatures in co-creating a highly diversified, self-determining world. He becomes the sole witness to God’s ecocide, the Flood, which reorganizes creation in a starkly dualistic hierarchy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barrow, Mark V., Jr. Nature’s Ghosts: Confronting Extinction from the Age of Jefferson to the Age of Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsky, Robert. “Byron and Catastrophism: A Reading of “Heaven and Hell”.” Discours Social, 1988: 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, Bernard. “Fiction’s Limit and Eden’s Door.” In Byron and the Limits of Fiction, ed. Bernard Beaty and Vincent Newey. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, Murray. The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. Oakland, CA: A. K. Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostetter, Edward E. The Romantic Ventriloquists: Wordsworth, Coleridge, Keats, Shelley, Byron. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, Paul. “Byron’s Cain: A Romantic Version of the Fall.” Kenyon Review 2, no. 3 (1980): 50–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, Rachel. Silent Spring. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheeke, Stephen. Byron and Place: History, Translation, Nostalgia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clubbe, John. “The New Prometheus of New Men’: Byron’s 1816 Poems and Manfred.” In Nineteenth Century Literary Perspectives: Essays in Honor of Lionel Stevenson, ed. Clyde de L. Ryals, 17–47. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, Michael G. The Blind Man Traces the Circle: On the Patterns and Philosophy of Byron’s Poetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingley, Robert. “Byron and the Coliseum: The Art of Recycling.” Byron Journal 33, no. 1 (2005): 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, Anthony B. “Byron and the Emergence of Japhet in Heaven and Earth.” English Studies in Canada 21, no. 4 (December 1995): 433–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, Leslie, P. “Reciprocity and Environmental Obligations.” Hofstra Law Review 37 (2009): 1007–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Carolyn. Byron’s Heroines. Oxford: Clarendon University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillispie, Charles Coulston. Genesis and Geology: A Study in the Relations of Scientific Thought, Natural Theology, and Social Opinion in Great Britain, 1790–1850. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleckner, Robert F. Byron and the Ruins of Paradise. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, Wolf Z. “Byron’s Lapse into Orthodoxy: An Unorthodox Reading of Cain.” In The Plays of Lord Byron: Critical Essays, eds. Robert Gleckner and Bernard Beatty, 251–272. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, Wolf Z. “My Brother’s Keeper: The Biblical Heritage in Byron’s Cain.” In Byron: Heritage and Legacy, ed. Cheryl A. Wilson, 83–92. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Anthony. Byron and the Forms of Thought. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Emily A. Bernhard. The Development of Byron’s Philosophy of Knowledge: Certainty in Uncertainty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karkoulis, Dimitri. “`They pluck’d the tree of Science / And sin’: Byron’s Cain and the Science of Sacrilege.” European Romantic Review, 2007: 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon-Jones, Christine. Kindred Brutes: Animals in Romantic-Period Writing. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, Karl. Ecological Literary Criticism: Romantic Imagining and the Biology of Mind. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. “Will Non-Humans Be Saved?: An Argument in Ecotheology.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15 (2009): 459–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord Byron, George Gordon. Byron’s Letters and Journals, ed. Leslie A. Marchand. 12 vols. London: John Murray, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Lord Byron: The Complete Poetical Works, eds. Jerome J. McGann and Barry Weller. Vol. 6. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Oxford World Classics: Lord Byron, The Major Works, ed. Jerome J. McGann. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, Ernest J. Byron: the Record of a Quest; Studies in the Poet’s Concept and Treatment of Nature,. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, Jerome. “Byron and Wordsworth.” In Byron and Romanticism, ed. James Soderholm, 173–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, Jerome J., and Murray Roston. “Orthodoxy and Unorthodoxy in Heaven and Earth.” In The Plays of Lord Byron: Critical Essays, eds. Robert Gleckner and Bernard Beatty, 291–300. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVeigh, Daniel M. “Manfred’s Curse.” Studies in English Literature, 1982: 610–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melaney, William D. “Ambiguous Difference: Ethical Concern in Byron’s Manfred.” New Literary History 36, no. 3 (2005): 461–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Timothy. “Byron’s Manfred and Ecocriticism.” In Palgrave Advances in Byron Studies, ed. Jane Stabler, 155–170. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelschlaeger, Max. The Idea of Wilderness: From Prehistory to the Age of Ecology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pafford, Ward. “Byron and the Mind of Man: Childe Harold III–IV and Manfred.” Studies in Romanticism 1 (1962): 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, Morton D. Apocalypse and Millennium in English Romantic Poetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, Val. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawes, Alan. “1816–17: Childe Harold III and Manfred.” In The Cambridge Companion to Byron, ed. Drummond Bone, 118–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawes, Alan. “Byron’s Romantic Calvinism.” Byron Journal 40, no. 2 (2012): 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Byron’s Poetic Experimentation: Childe Harold, the Tales, and the Quest for Comedy. London: Ashgate Publishing, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Alan. “On the Borders of Heaven and Earth.” In The Plays of Lord Byron, eds. Robert Gleckner and Bernard Beatty, 301–320. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Charles. Shelley and Byron: The Snake and Eagle Wreathed in Fight. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, Martin J. S. Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Robert M. The Romantic Reformation: Religious Politics in English Literature, 1789–1824. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serenella, Iovino, and Serpil Oppermann. “Material Ecocriticism: Materiality, Agency, and Models of Narrativity.” Ecozone, 2012: 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperry, Stuart M. “Byron and the Meaning of Manfred.” Criticism 16 (1974): 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffan, Truman Guy. Lord Byron’s Cain: Twelve Essays and a Text with Variants and Annotations. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorselv, Peter L. The Byronic Hero: Types and Prototypes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twitchell, James. “The Supernatural Structure of Byron’s Manfred.” Studies in English Literature 15, no. 4 (1975): 601–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond. “Ideas of Nature.” In Culture and Materialism: Selected Essays, ed. Raymond Williams, 67–85. New York: Verso, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Duncan, ed. Romanticism: An Anthology. 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Davis A. The Biblical Flood: A Case Study of the Church’s Response to Extrabiblical Evidence. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Andrew Hubbell .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hubbell, J.A. (2018). Metaphysical Plays of Domination and Freedom. In: Byron's Nature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54238-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics