Skip to main content

Better Alternatives to Performance Appraisal in an Agile Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The End of Performance Appraisal

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

The summary in the previous chapter was not very flattering for the annual performance appraisal. In hierarchical worlds, the annual performance appraisal only appears to work, to some degree, for very few benefits, while in agile settings, the traditional annual performance appraisal is largely a complete failure. Criticism of this instrument is nothing new, although various authors have focused on very different aspects. What we are now interested in, however, are the alternatives. Numerous authors who subscribe, at least in part, to the criticism of the annual performance appraisal see no possible alternatives. Well-known management mastermind Edward E. Lawler III hits the nail on the head in one of his blog entries for Forbes, entitled “Performance Appraisals Are Dead, Long Live Performance Management” (Lawler, 2012). He rightly states that talent management without systematic employee evaluation is inconceivable. He also mentions that goals are simply essential when it comes to successfully running any organisation, meaning companies which do not evaluate performance will not cope, whether they like it or not. And that’s why these sorts of instruments will continue to exist in the future. End of story.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The original message to all employees can be read here: http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/12/5094864/microsoft-kills-stack-ranking-internal-structure (last viewed on 31/12/2015).

  2. 2.

    http://www.hreonline.com/HRE/view/story.jhtml?id=534355695 (last viewed on 31/12/2015).

Bibliography

  • Axelrod, B., Handfield-Jones, H., & Michaels, E. (2002, January). A new game plan for C players. Harvard Business Review, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A. (2001). Microsoft. Competing on talent (A). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breisig, T. (2005). Personalbeurteilung: Mitarbeitergespräche und Zielvereinbarungen regeln und gestalten. Bund-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A. (2010). Developing leadership talent: Delivering on the promise of structured programs. In R. Silzer & B. E. Dowell (Eds.), Strategy-driven talent management (pp. 281–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, R. C. (2005). Forced ranking: Making performance management work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler III, E. (2012). Performance appraisals are dead, Long live performance management. Last viewed 9 September, 2014, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/edwardlawler/2012/07/12/performance-appraisals-are-dead-long-live-performance-management/

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, E. (2013). The crowdsourced performance review: How to use the power of social recognition to transform employee performance. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odiorne, G. S. (1965). Management by objectives. A system of managerial leadership. New York, NY: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scullen, S. E., Bergey, P. K., & Aiman-Smith, L. (2005). Forced distribution rating systems and the improvement of workforce potential: A baseline simulation. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trost, A. (2014). Talent relationship management. Competitive recruiting strategies in times of talent shortage. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trost, A. (2017). Better Alternatives to Performance Appraisal in an Agile Context. In: The End of Performance Appraisal. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54235-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics