Skip to main content

Relevant Framework Conditions of Performance Appraisals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The End of Performance Appraisal

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 2530 Accesses

Abstract

Anyone who examines annual performance appraisals more intensively, reads books about it, attends seminars, or consults various advisors will quickly get the impression that there’s just one right approach. Critical literature, on the other hand, often questions the fundamental benefit of this instrument in a rather polarising manner. But there’s no “one best way”, nor should annual performance appraisals be viewed as cure-alls or be flatly demonised across the board. We need to look into an organisation more closely, and understand relevant framework conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I described these approaches in detail in my book “Talent Relationship Management” (Trost, 2014).

Bibliography

  • Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardes, E., & Hanna, M. (2008, July). A theoretical review of flexibility, agility and responsiveness in the operations management literature. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, D. R. (1992). Managing at the speed of change. How resilient managers succeed and prosper where others fail. New York, NY: Villard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (2014). Group dynamics. Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., & Pritchard, L. (Eds.). (2002). Resilience and the behavior of large-scale systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A., Beatty, R. W., & Becker, B. E. (2005, December). A player or a positions? A strategic logic of workforce management. Harvard Business Review, 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illgen, D. R., & Feldman, J. M. (1983). Performance appraisal: A process approach. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organization behavior (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach, J. R., & Khan, Z. (2008). Leading outside the lines. How to mobilize the (in)formal organization, energize your team, and get better results. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen, P. (2009). Adopting key lessons from agile manufacturing to agile software product development - A comparative study. Technovation, 408–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work. The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1984). Goal setting: A motivational technique that works! Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2000). Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. Stuttgart: UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (2004). The future of work: How the new order of business will shape your organization, your management style, and your life. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R., Snyder, W., & Wenger, E. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. J., & Edwards, L. (2009). Managing talent retention. An ROI approach. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. The art & practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trost, A. (2014). Talent relationship management. Competitive recruiting strategies in times of talent shortage. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vester, F. (1988). The biocybernetic approach as a basis for planning our environment. System Practice, 1(4), 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). The lucifer effect: How good people turn evil. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trost, A. (2017). Relevant Framework Conditions of Performance Appraisals. In: The End of Performance Appraisal. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54235-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics