Advertisement

Common Threads: Directions for Computing Education

  • Samuel B. FeeEmail author
  • Amanda M. Holland-Minkley
  • Thomas E. Lombardi
Chapter
  • 378 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter concludes the volume New Directions for Computing Education: Embedding Computing Across Disciplines. In this text, the authors have raised and answered many questions regarding the future of interdisciplinary computing education, and presented ideas and examples for implementing appropriate pedagogies and curricula. Conclusions include recognizing the value of constructivist approaches, recognizing a difference between computer science education and computing education, and a realization that computing education should be guided by the broad educational mission of producing an educated citizenry rather than a mission of technical training or career preparation.

Keywords

Computing Computer science Education Interdisciplinary Constructivism Pedagogy Curriculum 

References

  1. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing. Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.Google Scholar
  3. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 1–18.Google Scholar
  4. Duffy, T., & Jonassen, D. (1992). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Guzdial, M. (2016). Learner-centered design of computing education: Research on computing for everyone. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics: Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar
  6. Iliadis, A., & Russo, F. (2016). Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716674238
  7. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Philip, T. M., Schuler-Brown, S., & Way, W. (2013). A framework for learning about big data with mobile technologies for democratic participation: Possibilities, limitations, and unanticipated obstacles. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 18(3), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure?. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computing and Information StudiesWashington & Jefferson CollegeWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.University of the Virgin IslandsCharlotte AmalieUSA

Personalised recommendations