Advertisement

An Interdisciplinary Model for Liberal Arts Computing Curricula

  • Amanda M. Holland-MinkleyEmail author
  • Samuel B. Fee
Chapter
  • 378 Downloads

Abstract

Over the decades, significant work has gone into defining appropriate adaptations of formal computer science curricula for the philosophy and resource constraints of a liberal arts institution. We propose an alternate model for liberal arts computing curricula that prioritizes interdisciplinary approaches and content. This approach reflects both traditional and modern perspectives on the strength of liberal arts education. We illustrate how this interdisciplinary model for a computing curriculum has been implemented at our institution through a curriculum that prioritizes inherent interdisciplinarity, broad perspectives on computing, constructivist pedagogies embedded throughout the curriculum, support for inclusive computing education, and administrative flexibility. In particular, we take a broad view of the interdisciplinary potential of computing education, drawing not only on traditional connections to math and science, but also to psychology, art, philosophy, history, and other disciplines. Through this perspective, we are able to, with limited resources, offer numerous programs of study. These include both a major and minor in Computing and Information Studies as well as supporting concentrations for non-majors in Computational Science, Graphic Design, and Professional Writing. We also offer a wide variety of courses supporting other college programs and the college-wide curriculum.

Keywords

Computing Computer science Education Curriculum Pedagogy Interdisciplinary Liberal arts 

References

  1. AAUW Educational Foundation. (2000). Tech-Savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. From AAUW Educational Foundation Commission on Technology, Gender, and Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  2. Austing, R. H., & Engel, G. L. (1973). A computer science course program for small colleges. Communications of the ACM, 16(3), 139–147. http://doi.org/10.1145/361972.361978
  3. Baldwin, D., & Brady, A. (2010). Guest editor’s introduction: Computer science in the liberal arts. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10(1). doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1731041.1731042
  4. Baldwin, D., Brady, A., Danyluk, A., Adams, J., & Lawrence, A. (2010). Case studies of liberal arts computer science programs. Transactions on Computing Education, 10(1), 4:1–4:30. http://doi.org/10.1145/1731041.1731045
  5. Barr, V. (2016). Disciplinary thinking, computational doing: Promoting interdisciplinary computing while transforming computer science enrollments. ACM Inroads, 7(2), 48–57. http://doi.org/10.1145/2891414
  6. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palinscar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, D.C.: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1997). The challenge of problem-based learning (2nd ed.,). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  9. Bruce, K. B., Cupper, R. D., & Drysdale, R. L. S. (2010). A history of the liberal arts computer science consortium and its model curricula. Transactions on Computing Education, 10(1), 3:1–3:12. http://doi.org/10.1145/1731041.1731044
  10. Cunningham, E. (1986). Computers and society: A liberal arts perspective. SIGCSE Bulletin, 18(1), 249–252. http://doi.org/10.1145/953055.5904
  11. Dinerstein, N. T. (1975). Does computer science belong in a liberal arts college? ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 7(2), 55–64. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/382205.382892
  12. Dooley, J. F. (2004). Moving to CC2001 at a small college. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 196–198). New York, NY, USA: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/1007996.1008048
  13. Fee, S. B., & Holland-Minkley, A. M. (2012). Correlating problems throughout an interdisciplinary curriculum. In The role of criticism in understanding problem solving: Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies 5. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Gibbs, N. E., & Tucker, A. B. (1986). A model curriculum for a liberal arts degree in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 29(3), 202–210. http://doi.org/10.1145/5666.5667
  15. Hannon, C. (2012). Service-learning and project management: The capstone course in information technology leadership. In B. A. Nejmeh (Ed.), Service-learning in the computer and information sciences: Practical applications in engineering education. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9781118319130.ch9
  16. Holland-Minkley, A. M., & Fee, S. B. (2012) Enabling innovative coursework through incremental problem-based learning. Issues in Information Systems, 13(1). Stillwater, OK: International Association for Computer Information Systems.Google Scholar
  17. Interim Review Task Force on Computing Curricula, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and IEEE Computer Society. (2008). Computer science curriculum 2008: An interim revision of CS 2001. New York, NY, USA: ACM.Google Scholar
  18. Izmirli, O., & Baird, B. (2002). A Model for integrating arts and technology in a liberal arts college. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 17(6), 102–109.Google Scholar
  19. Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and IEEE Computer Society. (2001). Computing curricula 2001: Computer science. New York, NY, USA: ACM.Google Scholar
  20. Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and IEEE Computer Society. (2013). Computer science curricula 2013: Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in computer science. New York, NY, USA: ACM.Google Scholar
  21. Koo, S. G. M. (2012). Computer science curriculum in a liberal arts setting: Case studies at the University of San Diego. In Presented at the IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Hong Kong: IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2012.6360332
  22. Liberal Arts Computer Science Consortium (LACS). (2007). A 2007 model curriculum for a liberal arts degree in computer science. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 7(2). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240200.1240202
  23. Lopez, A. A., Raymond, R., & Tardiff, R. (1977). A survey of computer science offerings in small liberal arts colleges. Communications of the ACM, 20(12), 902–906. http://doi.org/10.1145/359897.359899
  24. Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2001). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. North, M., & Holland-Minkley, A. M. (2006). Innovation in the IT curriculum: A case study in information technology leadership. Issues in Information Systems, 7(1), 294–298.Google Scholar
  26. Peckham, J., Harlow, L., Stuart, D., Silver, B., Mederer, H., & Stephenson, P. (2007). Broadening participation in computing: Issues and challenges. SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(3), 9–13.Google Scholar
  27. Roth, R. W. (1973). Computer science for liberal arts colleges a report of a workshop held at Wheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois July 12–14, 1972. SIGCSE Bulletin, 5(1), 70–76. http://doi.org/10.1145/953053.808082
  28. Savery, J. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (2005). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135–148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Sonnier, D. L. (2013). Computer science in a liberal arts school: Convincing the skeptic. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28(5), 115–121.Google Scholar
  31. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walker, H. M., & Kelemen, C. (2010). Computer science and the liberal arts: A philosophical examination. Transactions on Computing Education, 10(1), 2:1–2:10. http://doi.org/10.1145/1731041.1731043
  33. Walker, H. M., & Schneider, G. M. (1996). A revised model curriculum for a liberal arts degree in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 39(12), 85–95. http://doi.org/10.1145/240483.240502
  34. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  35. Worland, P. B. (1978). Using the ACM computer science curriculum recommendations in a liberal arts college. SIGCSE Bulletin, 10(4), 16–19. http://doi.org/10.1145/988906.988908

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computing and Information StudiesWashington & Jefferson CollegeWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations