Skip to main content

Toward Step-Size Adaptation in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10173))

Abstract

We give a definition for step size optimality in multiobjective optimization and visualize the optimal step sizes for a few two-dimensional example constellations. After that, we try to engineer a step size adaptation mechanism that also works in the real world. For this mechanism, we employ the self-adaptation of mutation strength, which is simple and well-known from single-objective optimization. The resulting approach obtains better results than simulated binary crossover and polynomial mutation on the bi-objective BBOB testbed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We are using step size and mutation strength synonymously in this work.

References

  1. Auger, A., Brockhoff, D., Hansen, N., Tušar, D., Tušar, T., Wagner, T.: The impact of variation operators on the performance of SMS-EMOA on the bi-objective BBOB-2016 test suite. In: Companion Publication of the 2016 Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1225–1232. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beume, N., Laumanns, M., Rudolph, G.: Convergence rates of (1 + 1) evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms. In: Schaefer, R., Cotta, C., Kołodziej, J., Rudolph, G. (eds.) PPSN 2010. LNCS, vol. 6238, pp. 597–606. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15844-5_60

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beume, N., Laumanns, M., Rudolph, G.: Convergence rates of SMS-EMOA on continuous bi-objective problem classes. In: Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, FOGA 2011, pp. 243–252. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beume, N., Naujoks, B., Emmerich, M.: SMS-EMOA: multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181(3), 1653–1669 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Beyer, H.G., Deb, K.: On self-adaptive features in real-parameter evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 5(3), 250–270 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beyer, H.G., Schwefel, H.P.: Evolution strategies - a comprehensive introduction. Nat. Comput. 1(1), 3–52 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Brandenbusch, K.: Experimentelle Analyse selbst-adaptiver Schrittweitenanpassung bei mehrkriteriellen Evolutionären Algorithmen. Bachelor’s thesis. TU Dortmund University, Department of Computer Science, Dortmund, September 2016. (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bringmann, K., Friedrich, T., Klitzke, P.: Generic postprocessing via subset selection for hypervolume and epsilon-indicator. In: Bartz-Beielstein, T., Branke, J., Filipič, B., Smith, J. (eds.) PPSN 2014. LNCS, vol. 8672, pp. 518–527. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10762-2_51

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brockhoff, D., Tran, T.D., Hansen, N.: Benchmarking numerical multiobjective optimizers revisited. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO 2015, pp. 639–646. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brockhoff, D., Tušar, T., Tušar, D., Wagner, T., Hansen, N., Auger, A.: Biobjective performance assessment with the COCO platform. e-print 1605.01746, arXiv (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.01746

  11. Conover, W.J., Iman, R.L.: Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am. Stat. 35(3), 124–129 (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Deb, K., Agrawal, R.B.: Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Syst. 9, 115–148 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eiben, A.E., Hinterding, R., Michalewicz, Z.: Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 3(2), 124–141 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eiben, A.E., Smith, J.E.: Introduction to Evolutionary Computing. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hupkens, I., Deutz, A., Yang, K., Emmerich, M.: Faster exact algorithms for computing expected hypervolume improvement. In: Gaspar-Cunha, A., Henggeler Antunes, C., Coello, C.C. (eds.) EMO 2015. LNCS, vol. 9019, pp. 65–79. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15892-1_5

    Google Scholar 

  17. Igel, C., Hansen, N., Roth, S.: Covariance matrix adaptation for multi-objective optimization. Evol. Comput. 15(1), 1–28 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Judt, L., Mersmann, O., Naujoks, B.: Non-monotonicity of observed hypervolume in 1-greedy S-metric selection. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 20(5–6), 277–290 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klinkenberg, J.W., Emmerich, M.T.M., Deutz, A.H., Shir, O.M., Bäck, T.: A reduced-cost SMS-EMOA using kriging, self-adaptation, and parallelization. In: Ehrgott, M., Naujoks, B., Stewart, J.T., Wallenius, J. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Energy and Transportation Systems. LNE, vol. 634, pp. 301–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04045-0_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Kursawe, F.: A variant of evolution strategies for vector optimization. In: Schwefel, H.-P., Männer, R. (eds.) PPSN 1990. LNCS, vol. 496, pp. 193–197. Springer, Heidelberg (1991). doi:10.1007/BFb0029752

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Naujoks, B., Quagliarella, D., Bartz-Beielstein, T.: Sequential parameter optimisation of evolutionary algorithms for airfoil design. In: Winter, G. (ed.) Proceedings of Design and Optimization: Methods and Application (ERCOFTAC 2006), pp. 231–235. University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pink, R.: Optimale Schrittweiten für einen bikriteriellen Evolutionären Algorithmus mit S-Metrik Selektion. Bachelor’s thesis. TU Dortmund University, Department of Computer Science, Dortmund, September 2016. (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rechenberg, I.: Evolutionsstrategie - Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution. Frommann Holzboog, Stuttgart (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rudolph, G.: On a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and its convergence to the Pareto set. In: IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings, pp. 511–516 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schumer, M., Steiglitz, K.: Adaptive step size random search. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 13(3), 270–276 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tušar, T., Brockhoff, D., Hansen, N., Auger, A.: COCO: the bi-objective black box optimization benchmarking (bbob-biobj) test suite. e-print 1604.00359, arXiv (2016). https://www.arxiv.org/abs/1604.00359v2

  27. Wessing, S.: Repair methods for box constraints revisited. In: Esparcia-Alcázar, A.I. (ed.) EvoApplications 2013. LNCS, vol. 7835, pp. 469–478. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37192-9_47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Wessing, S., Beume, N., Rudolph, G., Naujoks, B.: Parameter tuning boosts performance of variation operators in multiobjective optimization. In: Schaefer, R., Cotta, C., Kołodziej, J., Rudolph, G. (eds.) PPSN 2010. LNCS, vol. 6238, pp. 728–737. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15844-5_73

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Wessing .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wessing, S., Pink, R., Brandenbusch, K., Rudolph, G. (2017). Toward Step-Size Adaptation in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. In: Trautmann, H., et al. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10173. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54156-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54157-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics