Abstract
MR-Sort (Majority Rule Sorting) is a multiple criteria sorting method which assigns an alternative a to category \(C^h\) when a is better than the lower limit of \(C^h\) on a weighted majority of criteria, and this is not true with the upper limit of \(C^h\). We enrich the descriptive ability of MR-Sort by the addition of coalitional vetoes which operate in a symmetric way as compared to the MR-Sort rule w.r.t. to category limits, using specific veto profiles and veto weights. We describe a heuristic algorithm to learn such an MR-Sort model enriched with coalitional veto from a set of assignment examples, and show how it performs on real datasets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is worth noting that outranking methods used for sorting are not subject to Condorcet effects (cycles in the preference relation), since alternatives are not compared in pairwise manner but only to profiles limiting the categories.
- 2.
“weak preference” means being “at least as good as”.
References
Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C.: Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M.: Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 138(2), 229–246 (2002)
Leroy, A., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning the parameters of a multiple criteria sorting method. In: Brafman, R.I., Roberts, F.S., Tsoukiàs, A. (eds.) ADT 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6992, pp. 219–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24873-3_17
Tehrani, A.F., Cheng, W., Dembczyński, K., Hüllermeier, E.: Learning monotone nonlinear models using the Choquet integral. Mach. Learn. 89(1–2), 183–211 (2012)
Sobrie, O., Pirlot, M., Mousseau, V.: New veto relations for sorting models. Technical report, Laboratoire Génie Industriel, Ecole Centrale Paris Cahiers de recherche 2014–04, October 2014
Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning the parameters of a non compensatory sorting model. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) ADT 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9346, pp. 153–170. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23114-3_10
Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning the parameters of a majority rule sorting model taking attribute interactions into account. In: DA2PL 2014 Workshop From Multiple Criteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning, pp. 22–30, Paris, France (2014)
Olteanu, A.L., Meyer, P.: Inferring the parameters of a majority rule sorting model with vetoes on large datasets. In: DA2PL 2014 : From Multicriteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning, pp. 87–94 (2014)
Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning MR-sort rules with coalitional veto. In: DA2PL 2016: From Multicriteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning, p. 7 (2016)
Yu, W.: Aide multicritère à la décision dans le cadre de la problématique du tri: méthodes et applications. Ph.D. thesis, LAMSADE, Université Paris Dauphine, Paris (1992)
Roy, B., Bouyssou, D.: Aide multicritère à la décision: méthodes et cas. Economica Paris (1993)
Bouyssou, D., Pirlot, M.: A characterization of concordance relations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 167(2), 427–443 (2005)
Bouyssou, D., Pirlot, M.: Further results on concordance relations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181, 505–514 (2007)
Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T.: An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, I: the case of two categories. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178(1), 217–245 (2007)
Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T.: An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, II: more than two categories. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178(1), 246–276 (2007)
Roy, B.: The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theor. Decis. 31, 49–73 (1991)
Chateauneuf, A., Jaffray, J.-Y.: Derivation of some results on monotone capacities by Mobius inversion. In: Bouchon, B., Yager, R.R. (eds.) IPMU 1986. LNCS, vol. 286, pp. 95–102. Springer, Heidelberg (1987). doi:10.1007/3-540-18579-8_8
Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning a majority rule model from large sets of assignment examples. In: Perny, P., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A. (eds.) ADT 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8176, pp. 336–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41575-3_26
Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R.: Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. J. Global Optim. 12(1), 157–174 (1998)
Mousseau, V., Figueira, J.R., Naux, J.P.: Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: some experimental results. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130(1), 263–275 (2001)
The, A.N., Mousseau, V.: Using assignment examples to infer category limits for the ELECTRE TRI method. J. Multi-criteria Decis. Anal. 11(1), 29–43 (2002)
Dias, L., Mousseau, V., Figueira, J.R., Clímaco, J.: An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 138(1), 332–348 (2002)
Doumpos, M., Marinakis, Y., Marinaki, M., Zopounidis, C.: An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: the case of the ELECTRE TRI method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199(2), 496–505 (2009)
Cailloux, O., Meyer, P., Mousseau, V.: Eliciting ELECTRE TRI category limits for a group of decision makers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(1), 133–140 (2012)
Zheng, J., Metchebon, S.A., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning criteria weights of an optimistic ELECTRE TRI sorting rule. Comput. OR 49, 28–40 (2014)
Sobrie, O., Lazouni, M.E.A., Mahmoudi, S., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: A new decision support model for preanesthetic evaluation. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 133, 183–193 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M. (2017). A Population-Based Algorithm for Learning a Majority Rule Sorting Model with Coalitional Veto. In: Trautmann, H., et al. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10173. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54156-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54157-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)