Skip to main content

A Population-Based Algorithm for Learning a Majority Rule Sorting Model with Coalitional Veto

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10173))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

MR-Sort (Majority Rule Sorting) is a multiple criteria sorting method which assigns an alternative a to category \(C^h\) when a is better than the lower limit of \(C^h\) on a weighted majority of criteria, and this is not true with the upper limit of \(C^h\). We enrich the descriptive ability of MR-Sort by the addition of coalitional vetoes which operate in a symmetric way as compared to the MR-Sort rule w.r.t. to category limits, using specific veto profiles and veto weights. We describe a heuristic algorithm to learn such an MR-Sort model enriched with coalitional veto from a set of assignment examples, and show how it performs on real datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is worth noting that outranking methods used for sorting are not subject to Condorcet effects (cycles in the preference relation), since alternatives are not compared in pairwise manner but only to profiles limiting the categories.

  2. 2.

    “weak preference” means being “at least as good as”.

References

  1. Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C.: Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M.: Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 138(2), 229–246 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Leroy, A., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning the parameters of a multiple criteria sorting method. In: Brafman, R.I., Roberts, F.S., Tsoukiàs, A. (eds.) ADT 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6992, pp. 219–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24873-3_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Tehrani, A.F., Cheng, W., Dembczyński, K., Hüllermeier, E.: Learning monotone nonlinear models using the Choquet integral. Mach. Learn. 89(1–2), 183–211 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Sobrie, O., Pirlot, M., Mousseau, V.: New veto relations for sorting models. Technical report, Laboratoire Génie Industriel, Ecole Centrale Paris Cahiers de recherche 2014–04, October 2014

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning the parameters of a non compensatory sorting model. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) ADT 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9346, pp. 153–170. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23114-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning the parameters of a majority rule sorting model taking attribute interactions into account. In: DA2PL 2014 Workshop From Multiple Criteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning, pp. 22–30, Paris, France (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Olteanu, A.L., Meyer, P.: Inferring the parameters of a majority rule sorting model with vetoes on large datasets. In: DA2PL 2014 : From Multicriteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning, pp. 87–94 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning MR-sort rules with coalitional veto. In: DA2PL 2016: From Multicriteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning, p. 7 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu, W.: Aide multicritère à la décision dans le cadre de la problématique du tri: méthodes et applications. Ph.D. thesis, LAMSADE, Université Paris Dauphine, Paris (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roy, B., Bouyssou, D.: Aide multicritère à la décision: méthodes et cas. Economica Paris (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bouyssou, D., Pirlot, M.: A characterization of concordance relations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 167(2), 427–443 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Bouyssou, D., Pirlot, M.: Further results on concordance relations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181, 505–514 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T.: An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, I: the case of two categories. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178(1), 217–245 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T.: An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, II: more than two categories. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178(1), 246–276 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Roy, B.: The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theor. Decis. 31, 49–73 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Chateauneuf, A., Jaffray, J.-Y.: Derivation of some results on monotone capacities by Mobius inversion. In: Bouchon, B., Yager, R.R. (eds.) IPMU 1986. LNCS, vol. 286, pp. 95–102. Springer, Heidelberg (1987). doi:10.1007/3-540-18579-8_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning a majority rule model from large sets of assignment examples. In: Perny, P., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A. (eds.) ADT 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8176, pp. 336–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41575-3_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R.: Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. J. Global Optim. 12(1), 157–174 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Mousseau, V., Figueira, J.R., Naux, J.P.: Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: some experimental results. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130(1), 263–275 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. The, A.N., Mousseau, V.: Using assignment examples to infer category limits for the ELECTRE TRI method. J. Multi-criteria Decis. Anal. 11(1), 29–43 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Dias, L., Mousseau, V., Figueira, J.R., Clímaco, J.: An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 138(1), 332–348 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Doumpos, M., Marinakis, Y., Marinaki, M., Zopounidis, C.: An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: the case of the ELECTRE TRI method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199(2), 496–505 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Cailloux, O., Meyer, P., Mousseau, V.: Eliciting ELECTRE TRI category limits for a group of decision makers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(1), 133–140 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng, J., Metchebon, S.A., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning criteria weights of an optimistic ELECTRE TRI sorting rule. Comput. OR 49, 28–40 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Sobrie, O., Lazouni, M.E.A., Mahmoudi, S., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: A new decision support model for preanesthetic evaluation. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 133, 183–193 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Olivier Sobrie , Vincent Mousseau or Marc Pirlot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M. (2017). A Population-Based Algorithm for Learning a Majority Rule Sorting Model with Coalitional Veto. In: Trautmann, H., et al. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10173. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54156-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54157-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics