Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of Fast Adaptive Preference-Guided Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10173))

Abstract

In Simulation-based Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization, the number of simulation runs is very limited, since the complex simulation models require long execution times. With the help of preference information, the optimization result can be improved by guiding the optimization towards relevant areas in the objective space with, for example, the Reference Point-based NSGA-II algorithm (R-NSGA-II) [4]. Since the Pareto-relation is the primary fitness function in R-NSGA-II, the algorithm focuses on exploring the objective space with high diversity. Only after the population has converged close to the Pareto-front does the influence of the reference point distance as secondary fitness criterion increase and the algorithm converges towards the preferred area on the Pareto-front.

In this paper, we propose a set of extensions of R-NSGA-II which adaptively control the algorithm behavior, in order to converge faster towards the reference point. The adaption can be based on criteria such as elapsed optimization time or the reference point distance, or a combination thereof. In order to evaluate the performance of the adaptive extensions of R-NSGA-II, a performance metric for reference point-based EMO algorithms is used, which is based on the Hypervolume measure called the Focused Hypervolume metric [12]. It measures convergence and diversity of the population in the preferred area around the reference point. The results are evaluated on two benchmark problems of different complexity and a simplistic production line model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brockhoff, D., Bader, J., Thiele, L., Zitzler, E.: Directed multiobjective optimization based on the weighted hypervolume indicator. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 20(5–6), 291–317 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., Siegmund, F., Ng, A.H.C.: R-HV: a metric for computing hyper-volume for reference point based EMOs. In: Panigrahi, B.K., Suganthan, P.N., Das, S. (eds.) SEMCCO 2014. LNCS, vol. 8947, pp. 98–110. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20294-5_9. ISBN: 978-3-319-20293-8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K., Sundar, J., Bhaskara Rao, N., Chaudhur, S.: Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Res. 2(3), 273–286 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K., Sinha, A., Korhonen, P.J., Wallenius, J.: An interactive evolutionary multi-objective optimization method based on progressively approximated value functions. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 14(5), 723–739 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Enginarlar, E., Li, J., Meerkov, S.M.: How lean can lean buffers be? IIE Trans. 37(4), 333–342 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, K., Deb, K.: Performance Assessment for Preference-Based Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Using Reference Points (2016, submitted to journal). http://www.egr.msu.edu/kdeb/papers/c2016001.pdf

  8. López-Jaimes, A., Arias Montaño, A., Coello Coello, C.A.: Preference incorporation to solve many-objective airfoil design problems. In: Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2011, New Orleans, USA, pp. 1605–1612 (2011). ISBN: 978-1-4244-7834-7

    Google Scholar 

  9. López-Jaimes, A., Arias Montaño, A., Coello Coello, C.A.: Including preferences into a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to deal with many-objective engineering optimization problems. Inf. Sci. 277, 1–20 (2014). ISSN: 0020–0255

    Google Scholar 

  10. Siegmund, F., Ng, A.H.C., Deb, K.: Finding a preferred diverse set of pareto-optimal solutions for a limited number of function calls. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2012, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 2417–2424 (2012). ISBN: 978–1-4673-1508-1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Siegmund, F., Ng, A.H.C., Deb, K.: A comparative study of dynamic resampling strategies for guided evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2013, Cancún, Mexico, pp. 1826–1835 (2013). ISBN: 978-1-4799-0454-9

    Google Scholar 

  12. Siegmund, F., Ng, A.H.C., Deb, K.: Hybrid dynamic resampling for guided evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Guimarães, Portugal, pp. 366–380 (2015). ISBN: 978-3-319-15934-8

    Google Scholar 

  13. Siegmund, F., Ng, A.H.C., Deb, K.: A ranking and selection strategy for preference-based evolutionary multi-objective optimization of variable-noise problems. In: Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation WCCI-CEC 2016, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 3035–3044, July 2016. ISBN: 978-1-5090-0623-6

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stump, G., Simpson, T.W., Donndelinger, J.A., Lego, S., Yukish, M.: Visual steering commands for trade space exploration: user-guided sampling with example. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 9(4), 1–10 (2009). 044501, ISSN: 1530–9827

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L.: Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evol. Comput. 8(2), 173–195 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms — a comparative case study. In: Eiben, A.E., Bäck, T., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 1998. LNCS, vol. 1498, pp. 292–301. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). doi:10.1007/BFb0056872

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially funded by the Knowledge Foundation, Sweden, through the IDSS project. The authors gratefully acknowledge their provision of research funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Siegmund .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Siegmund, F., Ng, A.H.C., Deb, K. (2017). A Comparative Study of Fast Adaptive Preference-Guided Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization. In: Trautmann, H., et al. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10173. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54156-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54157-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics