Skip to main content

Multi-objective Representation Setups for Deformation-Based Design Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10173))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The increase of complexity in virtual product design requires high-quality optimization algorithms capable to find the global parameter solution for a given problem. The representation, which defines the encoding of the design and the mapping from parameter space to design space, is a key aspect for the performance of the optimization process. To initialize representations for a high performing optimization we utilize the concept of evolvability. Our interpretation of this concept consists of three performance criteria, namely variability, regularity, and improvement potential, where regularity and improvement potential characterize conflicting goals. In this article we address the generation of initial representation setups trading off between these two conflicting criteria for design optimization. We analyze Pareto-optimal compromises for deformation representations with radial basis functions in two test scenarios: fitting of 1D height fields and fitting of 3D face scans. We use the Pareto front as a ground-truth to show the feasibility of a single-objective optimization targeting one preference-based trade-off. Based on the results of both optimization approaches we propose two heuristic methods, Lloyd sampling and orthogonal least squares sampling, targeting representations with high regularity and high improvement potential at the two ends of the Pareto front. Thereby, we overcome the time consuming process of an evolutionary optimization to set up high-performing representations for these two cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amoignon, O., Hradil, J., Navratil, J.: A numerical study of adaptive FFD in aerodynamic shape optimization. In: Proceedings of 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amoignon, O., Navrátil, J., Hradil, J.: Study of parameterizations in the project CEDESA. In: Proceedings of 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, G., Schäfer, M., Jameson, A.: An advanced NURBS fitting procedure for post-processing of grid-based shape optimizations. In: Proceedings of 49th Aerospace Sciences Meeting (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, S., Billings, S.A., Luo, W.: Orthogonal least squares methods and their application to non-linear system identification. Int. J. Control 50(5), 1873–1896 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa, E., Biancolini, M.E., Groth, C., Cella, U., Veble, G., Andrejasic, M.: RBF-based aerodynamic optimization of an industrial glider. In: Proceedings of International CAE Conference (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golub, G.H., Van Loan, C.F.: Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomm, J.B., Yu, D.L.: Selecting radial basis function network centers with recursive orthogonal least squares training. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11(2), 306–314 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu, W.M., Hughes, J.F., Kaufman, H.: Direct manipulation of free-form deformations. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 177–184 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Igel, C., Heidrich-Meisner, V., Glasmachers, T.: Shark. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 993–996 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lloyd, S.P.: Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 28(2), 129–137 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. MacQueen, J.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 281–297 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Menzel, S., Olhofer, M., Sendhoff, B.: Direct manipulation of free form deformation in evolutionary design optimisation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving From Nature, pp. 352–361 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mina, A.A., Braha, D., Bar-Yam, Y.: Complex engineered systems: a new paradigm. In: Complex Engineered Systems: Science Meets Technology. Understanding Complex Systems, pp. 1–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ohtake, Y., Belyaev, A., Seidel, H.P.: 3D scattered data approximation with adaptive compactly supported radial basis functions. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Shape Modeling Applications, pp. 31–39 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olhofer, M., Jin, Y., Sendhoff, B.: Adaptive encoding for aerodynamic shape optimization using evolution strategies. In: Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 576–583 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richter, A., Achenbach, J., Menzel, S., Botsch, M.: Evolvability as a quality criterion for linear deformation representations in evolutionary optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 901–910 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richter, A., Botsch, M., Menzel, S.: Evolvability of representations in complex system engineering: a survey. In: Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1327–1335 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sieger, D., Gaulik, S., Achenbach, J., Menzel, S., Botsch, M.: Constrained space deformation techniques for design optimization. Comput. Aided Des. 73, 40–51 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sieger, D., Menzel, S., Botsch, M.: A comprehensive comparison of shape deformation methods in evolutionary design optimization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Optimization (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simões, L.F., Izzo, D., Haasdijk, E., Eiben, A.E.: Self-adaptive genotype-phenotype maps: neural networks as a meta-representation. In: International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pp. 110–119 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sterelny, K.: Symbiosis, evolvability and modularity. In: Modularity in Development and Evolution, pp. 490–516. University of Chicago Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vuong, A.V., Giannelli, C., Jüttler, B., Simeon, B.: A hierarchical approach to adaptive local refinement in isogeometric analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200(49), 3554–3567 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Wagner, G.P., Altenberg, L.: Perspectives: complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50(3), 967–976 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Webb, A.R., Shannon, S.: Shape-adaptive radial basis functions. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 9(6), 1155–1166 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wendland, H.: Scattered Data Approximation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, Z., Sendhoff, B., Tang, K., Yao, X.: Target shape design optimization by evolving B-splines with cooperative coevolution. Appl. Soft Comput. 48, 672–682 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Seah, H.S.: Adaptive T-spline surface fitting to z-map models. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australasia and South East Asia, pp. 405–411 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Andreas Richter gratefully acknowledges the financial support from Honda Research Institute Europe (HRI-EU). Mario Botsch is supported by the Cluster of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology “CITEC” (EXC 277) at Bielefeld University, funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Richter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Richter, A., Achenbach, J., Menzel, S., Botsch, M. (2017). Multi-objective Representation Setups for Deformation-Based Design Optimization. In: Trautmann, H., et al. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10173. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54156-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54157-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics