Abstract
The EU represents for US companies a very important market in the terms of chemicals. In 2014 US chemical export counted for almost $164 billion USD while import in chemicals counted for $183 billion USD. In the terms of export, the most important partner according to percentage share are the remaining two NAFTA countries: Canada (14.62%) and Mexico (9.95%). On the third place is Belgium (7.51%), which is followed by Japan (6.08%) and China (5.9%). However, if we count EU28 as one subject, the share of the EU on the US export is 30.5% (WITS 2015).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is estimated that existing substances counts for 99% by volume of chemicals in commerce (Applegate 2008: 732).
- 2.
See for example the case Corrosion Proof Fittings v. EPA as summarized by Linda Stadler (1993) which led to failure of EPA to ban azbestos.
- 3.
For example 1986 Asbestos hazard Emergency Response Act, 1988 and 1990 Radon Acts, 2008 Mercury Export Ban Acts or 2010 Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act (see Schierow, Linda-Jo 2013).
Bibliography
American Chemistry Council (2016) ACC comments to inform EPA’s rulemaking on the conduct of risk evaluations under the Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act. https://www.americanchemistry.com/Comments-on-EPAs-Development-of-LCSA-Risk-Evaluation-Rule.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2016
Applegate JS (2008) Synthezing TSCA and REACH: practical principles for chemical regulation reform. Ecol Law Q 35:721–767
Berend K (2009) Experience and global implications of REACH. Contribution presented at Helsinki Chemicals Forum, Helsinki, 28–29 May 2009
Denison RA (2009a) Ten essential elements in TSCA Reform. Environ Law Report 39(1):1–9
Denison RA (2016) New chemicals under the new TSCA: growing pains now, but a stronger system going forward. http://blogs.edf.org/health/2016/12/02/new-chemicals-under-the-new-tsca-growing-pains-now-but-a-stronger-system-going-forward/#more-5860. Accessed 23 Dec 2016
OEHHA (2013) Proposition 65 in plain language. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. California Environmental Protection Agency. http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/pdf/P65Plain.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct 2016
Schierow L-J (2013) The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): a summary of the act and its major requirements. Congressional Research Service, 1 April 2013. http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL31905.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2016
Shapiro S (2013) Toxic chemical reform must help, not hinder, states and victim’s rights. Huffington Post, 30 October 2013. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sidney-shapiro/toxic-chemical-reform-mus_b_4170038.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Sharma V, Ashutosh K, Dhawan A (2012) Nanomaterials: exposure, effects and toxicity assessment. The National Academy of Sciences, India. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40011-012-0072-7#page-1. Accessed 1 Oct 2014
Simpson C (2012) Global developments in regulation of chemicals. Belgian Association of Chemical Distributors. Weekend de la Chimie, Liege, 14 September 2012
Stadler, Linda (1993) Corrosion Proof Fittings v. EPA: Asbestos in The Fifth Circuit-A Battle of Unreasonableness. ulane Environmental Law Journal 6(2):423-438
State of California Department of Justice (2016) Frequently Asked Questions. Available at: https://oag.ca.gov/prop65/faq (12. 3. 2016)
Uyesato D, Weiss M, Stepanyan J, Park DY, Yuki K, Ferris T, Bergkamp L (2013) REACH’s Impact on the rest of the world. In: Bergkamp L (ed) European Union REACH regulation for chemicals. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wilson MP, Schwarzman MR (2009) Toward a new US chemicals policy: rebuilding the foundation to advance new science, green chemistry and, environmental health. Environ Health Perspect 117(8):1202–1209
Wirth DA (2007) The EU’s new impact on american environmental regulation. Fletcher Forum World Affair 31(2):99–109
WITS (2015a) World integrated trade solutions. Available at: http://wits.worldbank.org (14 Feb 2016)
Yen JH (2013) Proposed Reform of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) in the 113th Congress: S. 1009 Compared with S. 696 and Current Law. Congressional Research Service, October 23, 2013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Filipec, O. (2017). Europeanization of US Chemical Policy?. In: REACH Beyond Borders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54154-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54154-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54153-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54154-9
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)