Abstract
The development of mammoplasty was initially marked by techniques that sought to achieve a good shape and projection of the breasts and resulted in large scars, as described by several authors. Later, there was a demand for techniques of breast reduction that resulted in progressively smaller scars, such as the L technique, vertical, and finally periareolar scars. Initially, the periareolar technique failed because of skin necrosis secondary to large subcutaneous detachments. Knowledge of the importance of preserving the subdermal vascular plexus and the standardization of this dissection ensured adequate skin vascularization and eliminated severe necrosis. Complications such as increased areola diameter and early ptosis were corrected with the application of a round block periareolar suture and adjustments in parenchymal resections respectively. In the technique presented here, the upper pole V resection associated with fixation of the breast muscle plane, ensures good projection of the breast and stable results in the medium and long term. The final scars around the areola have achieved a good appearance, which encouraged us to employ the technique.
References
Aboudib JH, Cadoso de Castro C, Coelho RS, Cupello AM (1991) Analysis of late results in postpregnancy mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 26:111–116
Benelli LA (1993) A new periareola mammaplasty: the “round block” technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 14:93–100
Bustos RA (1992) Periareolar mammaplasty with sikicone supporting lamina. Plast Reconstr Surg 89(4):646–657
Goes JCS (1989) Periareolar mammaplasty double skin technique. Rev Bras Cir Plast 4(23):55–63
Goes JCS (1996) Periareolar mammaplasty double skin technique with application of polyglactine or mixed mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:959
Hammond DC, Kim K (2016) The short scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty: management of complications. Clin Plast Surg 43(2):365–372. Epub 2016 Feb 5
Hinderer V Primera experiencia con una nueva técnica de mastoplastia para petosis ligera. VI Reunión Nacional de la Soc. Española de Cir. Plástica y Reconstructiva. Madri, Nov 1969
International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. ISAPS global statistics 2015. http://www.isaps.org/Media/Default/global-statistics/2015%20ISAPS%20Results.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2016
Kausch M, Zarem, Harvey A.M.D. (1976) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Breast: R. M. Goldwyn (ed.), 565 pages, Boston, Little, Brown & Company, 1976.
Noel A (1928) Lopez-Martinez. La chirurgie esthétique; nouveaux procédés chirurgicaux de correction du prolapsus mammaire. Le Concours Méd:41
Pitanguy I (1960) Breast hipertrophy. In: Transactions of international society of plastic surgeons, 2nd congress, London, 1959, Livingstone, Edinburgh, LTDA
Souza AM (1970) Mastoplastia por incisão periareolar superior. ARS Curandi. 28:80–82
Strombeck JO (1960) Mammaplasty—report of a new technique based on the two pedicle provedure. Br J Plast Surg 13:79
Peixoto G (1989) Reduction mammaplasty. In: Ribeiro L (ed) Cirurgia Plástica da mama. MEDSI, Rio de Janeiro, pp 113–127
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aboudib, J.H., Serra-Guimarães, F. (2018). Mammoplasty Using a Periareolar Approach. In: Avelar, J. (eds) Breast Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54115-0_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54115-0_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54114-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54115-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)