Skip to main content

Assessment of Electromagnetic Tracking Accuracy for Endoscopic Ultrasound

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 10170))

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a minimally-invasive imaging technique that can be technically difficult to perform due to the small field of view and uncertainty in the endoscope position. Electromagnetic (EM) tracking is emerging as an important technology in guiding endoscopic interventions and for training in endotherapy by providing information on endoscope location by fusion with pre-operative images. However, the accuracy of EM tracking could be compromised by the endoscopic ultrasound transducer. In this work, we quantify the precision and accuracy of EM tracking sensors inserted into the working channel of a flexible endoscope, with the ultrasound transducer turned on and off. The EUS device was found to have little (no significant) effect on static tracking accuracy although jitter increased significantly. A significant change in the measured distance between sensors arranged in a fixed geometry was found during a dynamic acquisition. In conclusion, EM tracking accuracy was not found to be significantly affected by the flexible endoscope.

M.J. Clarkson and D.C. Barratt—Joint senior author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.ndigital.com/medical/products/aurora/.

References

  1. Williams, D.B., Sahai, A.V., Aabakken, L., Penman, I.D., van Velse, A., Webb, J., Wilson, M., Hoffman, B.J., Hawes, R.H.: Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience. Gut 44, 720–726 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mertz, H., Gautam, S.: The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest. Endosc. 59, 33–37 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mori, K., Deguchi, D., Sugiyama, J., Suenaga, Y., Toriwaki, J., Maurer, C.R., Takabatake, H., Natori, H.: Tracking of a bronchoscope using epipolar geometry analysis and intensity-based image registration of real and virtual endoscopic images. Med. Image Anal. 6, 321–336 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fried, M.P., Kleefield, J., Gopal, H., Reardon, E., Ho, B.T., Kuhn, F.A.: Image-guided endoscopic surgery: results of accuracy and performance in a multicenter clinical study using an electromagnetic tracking system. Laryngoscope 107, 594–601 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sumiyama, K., Suzuki, N., Kakutani, H., Hino, S., Tajiri, H., Suzuki, H., Aoki, T.: A novel 3-dimensional EUS technique for real-time visualization of the volume data reconstruction process. Gastrointest. Endosc. 55, 723–728 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fritscher-Ravens, A., Knoefel, W.T., Krause, C., Swain, C.P., Brandt, L., Patel, K.: Three-dimensional linear endoscopic ultrasound—feasibility of a novel technique applied for the detection of vessel involvement of pancreatic masses. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 100, 1296–1302 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frantz, D.D., Wiles, A.D., Leis, S.E., Kirsch, S.R.: Accuracy assessment protocols for electromagnetic tracking systems. Phys. Med. Biol. 48, 2241–2251 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hummel, J.B., Bax, M.R., Figl, M.L., Kang, Y., Maurer, C., Birkfellner, W.W., Bergmann, H., Shahidi, R.: Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems. Med. Phys. 32, 2371–2379 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson, E., Yaniv, Z., Zhang, H., Nafis, C., Shen, E., Shechter, G., Wiles, A.D., Peters, T., Lindisch, D., Cleary, K.: A hardware and software protocol for the evaluation of electromagnetic tracker accuracy in the clinical environment: a multi-center study. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 6509, pp. 65092T–65092T–11 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nagy, M.: Towards unified electromagnetic tracking system assessment — static errors. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 236, 1905–1908 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Franz, A.M., Haidegger, T., Birkfellner, W., Cleary, K., Peters, T.M., Maier-Hein, L.: Electromagnetic tracking in medicine - A review of technology, validation, and applications. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 33, 1702–1725 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maier-Hein, L., Franz, A.M., Birkfellner, W., Hummel, J., Gergel, I., Wegner, I., Meinzer, H.P.: Standardized assessment of new electromagnetic field generators in an interventional radiology setting. Med. Phys. 39, 3424–3434 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Franz, A.M., Schmitt, D., Seitel, A., Chatrasingh, M., Echner, G., Oelfke, U., Nill, S., Birkfellner, W., Maier-Hein, L.: Standardized accuracy assessment of the calypso wireless transponder tracking system. Phys. Med. Biol. 59, 6797–6810 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Franz, A.M., März, K., Hummel, J., Birkfellner, W., Bendl, R., Delorme, S., Schlemmer, H.P., Meinzer, H.P., Maier-Hein, L.: Electromagnetic tracking for US-guided interventions: standardized assessment of a new compact field generator. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 7, 813–818 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hastenteufel, M., Vetter, M., Meinzer, H.P., Wolf, I.: Effect of 3D ultrasound probes on the accuracy of electromagnetic tracking systems. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32, 1359–1368 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Qi, Y., Sadjadi, H., Yeo, C.T., Hashtrudi-zaad, K., Member, S., Fichtinger, G.: Electromagnetic tracking performance analysis and optimization, pp. 6534–6538 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lugez, E., Sadjadi, H., Pichora, D.R., Ellis, R.E., Akl, S.G., Fichtinger, G.: Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 10, 253–262 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hummel, J., Figl, M., Kollmann, C., Bergmann, H., Birkfellner, W.: Evaluation of a miniature electromagnetic position tracker. Med. Phys. 29, 2205–2212 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nixon, M.A., McCallum, B.C., Fright, W.R., Price, N.B.: The effects of metals and interfering fields on electromagnetic trackers. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 7, 204–218 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirsch, S.R., Schilling, C., Brunner, G.: Assesment of metallic distortions of an electromagnetic tracking system. In: SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yaniv, Z., Wilson, E., Lindisch, D., Cleary, K.: Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment. Med. Phys. 36, 876–892 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leong, S., Ju, H., Marshall, H., Bowman, R., Yang, I., Ree, A.-M., Saxon, C., Fong, K.M.: Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy: a descriptive analysis. J. Thorac. Dis. 4, 173–185 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Szura, M., Bucki, K., Matyja, A., Kulig, J.: Evaluation of magnetic scope navigation in screening endoscopic examination of colorectal cancer. Surg. Endosc. 26, 632–638 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This publication presents independent research supported by Cancer Research UK (CRUK) (Multidisciplinary Award C28070/A19985).

The authors would like to thank Joe Evans from the UCL department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering for making and helping to design the accuracy assessment board, the supporting structures, and adapters.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ester Bonmati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bonmati, E. et al. (2017). Assessment of Electromagnetic Tracking Accuracy for Endoscopic Ultrasound. In: Peters, T., et al. Computer-Assisted and Robotic Endoscopy. CARE 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10170. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54057-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54057-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54056-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54057-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics