Skip to main content

How Can Quality Awareness Support Rapid Software Development? – A Research Preview

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2017)

Abstract

Context and Motivation: Rapid software development (RSD) refers to the organizational capability to develop, release, and learn from software in rapid cycles without compromising its quality. To achieve RSD, it is essential to understand and manage software quality along the software lifecycle. Question/Problem: Despite the numerous information sources related to product quality, there is a lack of mechanisms for supporting continuous quality management throughout the whole RSD process. Principal ideas/Results: We propose Q-Rapids, a data-driven, quality-aware RSD framework in which quality and functional requirements are managed together. Quality requirements are incrementally elicited and refined based on data gathered at both development time and runtime. Project, development, and runtime data is aggregated into quality-related indicators to support decision makers in steering future development cycles. Contributions: Q-Rapids aims to increase software quality through continuous data gathering and analysis, as well as continuous management of quality requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Inayat, I., Salim, S.S., Marczak, S., Daneva, M., Shamshirband, S.A.: Systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51(B), 915–929 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fitzgerald, B., Stol, K.J.: Continuous software engineering: a roadmap and agenda. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 176–189 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mäntylä, M.V., Adams, B., Khomh, F., Engström, E., Petersen, K.: On rapid releases and software testing: a case study and a semi-systematic literature review. Empirical Softw. Eng. 25(2), 1384–1425 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodríguez, P., Haghighatkhah, A., et al.: Continuous deployment of software intensive products and services: a systematic mapping study. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 263–291 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramesh, B., Baskerville, R., Cao, L.: Agile requirements engineering practices and challenges: an empirical study. Inf. Syst. J. 20(5), 449–480 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner, S.: Software Product Quality Control. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence, B., Wiegers, K., Ebert, C.: The top ten risks of requirements engineering. IEEE Softw. 18(6), 62–63 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung, L., Nixon, B.A., Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Non-functional Requirements in Software Engineering, vol. 5. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalpiaz, F., Korenko, M., Salay, R., Chechik, M.: Using the crowds to satisfy unbounded requirements. In: CrowdRE 2015, pp. 19–24 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maalej, M., Nayebi, M., Johann, T., Ruhe, G.: Toward data-driven requirements engineering. IEEE Softw. 33(1), 48–54 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Caracciolo, A., Lungu, L.F., Nierstrasz, O.: How do software architects specify and validate quality requirements? In: ECSA 2014, pp. 374–389 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schwaber, K.: Agile Project Management with Scrum. Microsoft Press, Redmond (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Leffingwell, D.: Agile Software Requirements: Lean Requirements Practices for Teams, Programs, and the Enterprise. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sauvola, T., Lwakatare, L.E., et al.: Towards customer-centric software development: a multiple-case study. In: Proceedings of Euromicro Conference on SEAA, pp. 9–17 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yaman, S.G., Sauvola, T., Riungu-Kalliosaari, L., Hokkanen, L., Kuvaja, P., Oivo, M., Männistö, T.: Customer involvement in continuous deployment: a systematic literature review. In: Daneva, M., Pastor, O. (eds.) REFSQ 2016. LNCS, vol. 9619, pp. 249–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30282-9_18

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kwan, I., Damian, D.: A survey of techniques in software repository mining. In: Technical report DCS-340-IR, University of Victoria (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, D.: Software analytics in practice – approaches and experiences. Microsoft research. In: Keynote PROMISE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas, S.W., Hassan, A.E., Blostein, D.: Mining unstructured software repositories. In: Mens, T., Serebrenik, A., Cleve, A. (eds.) Evolving Software Systems, pp. 139–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Dean, J., Ghemawat, S.: MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun. ACM 51(1), 107–113 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marz, N., Warren, J.: Big Data: Principles and Best Practices of Scalable Real Time Data Systems. Manning Publications Co., Greenwich (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wagner, S., Goeb, A., et al.: Operationalised product quality models and assessment: the Quamoco approach. Inf. Softw. Technol. 62, 101–123 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oriol, M., Franch, X., Marco, J.: Monitoring the service-based system lifecycle with SALMon. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(19), 6507–6521 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shihab, E., Hassan, A.E., Adams, B., Jiang, Z.M.: An industrial study on the risk of software changes. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on the FSE, Article 62 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is a result of the Q-Rapids project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement N° 732253.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liliana Guzmán .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guzmán, L., Oriol, M., Rodríguez, P., Franch, X., Jedlitschka, A., Oivo, M. (2017). How Can Quality Awareness Support Rapid Software Development? – A Research Preview. In: Grünbacher, P., Perini, A. (eds) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. REFSQ 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54045-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54045-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54044-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54045-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics