Skip to main content

An Integrated Cost–Benefit and Livelihood Approach for Assessing the Impact of Water Harvesting Techniques (WHTs) on Livelihoods: A Case Study in the Oum Zessar Watershed, South-East Tunisia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Despite broad interest in use of water harvesting techniques (WHTs) to reduce pressure on natural resources in arid zones, few ex post assessments are available on how WHTs impact livelihood sustainability. This paper assesses the impact of WHTs on the livelihood conditions of inhabitants in the Oum Zessar watershed in south-east Tunisia. We used an integrated impact assessment (IIA) framework incorporating extended cost–benefit analysis (ECBA) and the sustainable livelihoods approach (SLA). The former internalizes environmental impacts while the latter enables assessment of the contributions of WHTs to rural livelihoods in the watershed. We began by using ECBA to estimate the profitability of investments in WHTs. We then scaled up our impact perspective from the local level to the watershed level using SLA based on survey data from beneficiary households upstream, midstream and downstream. Our goal was to better understand and evaluate changes in livelihoods and associated environmental effects. We focused on the links between cost–benefit of WHTs and sustainable livelihoods, looking in particular at the capitals that connect the two. Our ECBA results suggest that WHT techniques did benefit the local population at both the private and the social level (IRR > 20%; NPV > 2000 TD/ha). Sensitivity analysis confirmed this result. SLA findings point to a central role of social capital in promoting sustainable livelihoods, followed by physical capital enhanced by WHTs construction, especially in the upstream and downstream segments of the watershed. Recommendations were derived from these outcomes for more integrated watershed management policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jessouris the plural of a jesr which is a typical macro-catchment WHT encountered in the mountains of Matmata, south-east Tunisia. A jesr is made up of a small dyke to retain runoff and sediments, alongside a terrace (cropping area) and the impluvium (catchment area) (Ouessar et al. 2009).

References

  • Abaab A (1986) Mutations socio-économiques de la Jeffara orientale (Sud tunisien): Revue de l’Occident musulman et de la. Méditerranée 41(1):327–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Abaab A, Guillaume H (2004) Entre local et global: pluralité d’acteurs, complexité d’intervention dans la gestion des ressources et le développement rural. IRD Ed Collect Latitudes 23:261–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Akroush S, Shideed K, Bruggeman A (2014) Economic analysis and environmental impacts of water harvesting techniques in the low rainfall areas of Jordan. Int J Agr Resour Gov Ecol 10(1):34–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann P (2002) Improving access to natural resources for the rural poor. A critical analysis of central concepts and emerging trends from a sustainable livelihoods perspective. LSP working paper (FAO)

    Google Scholar 

  • Belli P, Anderson JR, Barnum HN, Dixon JA, Tan J-P (2001) Economic analysis of investment operations, analytical tools and practical applications. WBI, World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté S, Healy T (2001) The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • CRDA (2013) Rapport annuel du Commissariat Régional au Développement Agricole

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearden P, Roland R, Allison G, Allen C (2002) Sustainable livelihood approaches: from the framework to the field: sustainable livelihood guidance sheets. Department for International Development, University of Bradford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleskens L, Stroosnijder L, Fetoui M (2002) Economic evaluation of on-site impact of water harvesting in southern Tunisia. In: de GJ, Ouessar M (eds) Water harvesting in Mediterranean zones: an impact assessment and economic evaluation. Tropical resource management papers 40. Wageningen University, pp 89–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleskens L, Stroosnijder L, Ouessar M, De Graaff J (2005) Evaluation of the on-site impact of water harvesting in southern Tunisia. J Arid Environ 62(4):613–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamoun M, Patton B, Hanchi B (2015) Assessment of vegetation response to grazing management in arid rangelands of southern Tunisia. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • INS (2014) N. I. o. S.. http://www.ins.nat.tn/

  • Karl M, Potters J, Colatei D, Dohrn S (2002) Participatory policy reform from a sustainable livelihoods perspective review of concepts and practical experiences. Livelihood Support Programme

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen T, Kortelainen M (2007) Valuing environmental factors in cost–benefit analysis using data envelopment analysis. Ecol Econ 62(1):56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MARH, and GIZ (2012) Stratégie Nationale sur le Changement Climatique Rapport de la stratégie, 165 p. http://www.environnement.gov.tn/fileadmin/medias/pdfs/dgeqv/chang_climatique_3.pdf

  • MEDD (2006) Programme d’action régional de lutte contre la désertification du Gouvernorat de Médenine: Publiction du Ministère de l’Environement et du Developpement Durable (MEDD)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachtergaele F, Biancalani R, Bunning S, George H (2010) Land degradation assessment: the LADA approach. In: Proceedings 19th world congress of soil science, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton A, Foster M (2001) The potential of using sustainable livelihoods approaches in poverty reduction strategy papers. Overseas Development Institute London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouessar M, Bruggeman A, Abdell F, Mohtar R, Gabriels D, Cornelis W (2009) Modelling water-harvesting systems in the arid south of Tunisia using SWAT. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:2003–2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouled Belgacem A, Sghaier M, Ouessar M (2011) Vulnérabilité de l’écosystème pastoral face au changement climatique dans le Gouvernorat de Médenine. MEAT/GIZ, Tunis. http://www.environnement.gov.tn/

  • Pinstrup-Andersen P, Pandya-Lorch R (1998) Food security and sustainable use of natural resources: a 2020 vision. Ecol Econ 26(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranasinghe M (1994) Extended benefit-cost analysis: quantifying some environmental impacts in a hydropower project. Proj Appraisal 9(4):243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranasinghe M (1997) Bounds on the value of waterfalls: a case study from a hydropower project. Proj Appraisal 12(3):185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiettecatte W, Ouessar M, Gabriels D, Tanghe S, Heirman S, Abdelli F (2005) Impact of water harvesting techniques on soil and water conservation: a case study on a micro catchment in southeastern Tunisia. J Arid Environ 61:297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sghaier M, Arbi AM, Tonneau J-P, Ounalli N, Jeder H, Bonin M, McNeil D, Nesheim I, Brouwer F (2012a) Land degradation in the arid Jeffara region, Tunisia: land use policies for sustainable development: exploring integrated assessment approaches. Edward Elgar, p 89

    Google Scholar 

  • Sghaier M, Arbi AM, Tonneau JP, Ounalli N, Jeder H, Bonin M (2012b) Land degradation in the arid Jeffara Region, Tunisia. In: McNeil D, Nesheim I, Brouwer F (eds) Land use policies for sustainable development: exploring integrated assessment approaches. Edward Elgar, p 89

    Google Scholar 

  • Sghaier M, Mahdhi N, De Graaff J, Ouessar M (2002) Economic assessment of soil and water conservation works: case of the oued Oum Zessar watershed in south-eastern Tunisia. In: De Graaff J, Ouessar M (eds) Water harvesting in Mediterranean zones: an impact assessment and economic evaluation. Wageningen University, The Netherland, pp 101–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Wholey JS, Hatry HP, Newcomer KE (2010) Handbook of practical program evaluation. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Arbi Abdeladhim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abdeladhim, M.A., Sghaier, M., Fleskens, L., Ouessar, M. (2017). An Integrated Cost–Benefit and Livelihood Approach for Assessing the Impact of Water Harvesting Techniques (WHTs) on Livelihoods: A Case Study in the Oum Zessar Watershed, South-East Tunisia. In: Ouessar, M., Gabriels, D., Tsunekawa, A., Evett, S. (eds) Water and Land Security in Drylands. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54021-4_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics