Skip to main content

Afterword: New Institutional, Inhabited Institutional, and a Cultural-Organizational Approach to Studying Elites and Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Universities and the Production of Elites

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education ((PSGHE))

Abstract

The afterword reflects on this volume’s chapters using several approaches attentive to culture and organization. It first sketches the now-classic new institutional approach to studying the origin and diffusion of elite practices and identities in educational settings. It then lays out several of the critiques that sociologists level against new institutionalism – in particular, its emphasis on organizational convergence and its general neglect of power and interests. Binder proposes to use the relatively new “inhabited institutions” mode of organizational analysis for a more sophisticated understanding of the fit between broad-scale logics governing higher education and organizational action at the level of regions, nations, and individual university campuses. Finally, she lays out the elements of a cultural-organizational approach to studying individual universities’ distinctive effects on shaping elites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armstrong, E., and Hamilton, L. (2013). Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality. Cambridge: Harvard UP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. (2014). The Schooled Society: The Educational Transformation of Global Culture. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. (2011). Opting Out: Losing the Potential of America’s Young Black Elite. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, A. (2007). For Love and Money: Organizations’ Creative Responses to Multiple Environmental Logics. Theory and Society, 36(6), pp. 547–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, A., and Wood, K. (2013). Becoming Right: How Campuses Shape Young Conservatives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, A., Davis, D., and Bloom, N. (2016). Career Funneling: How Elite Students Learn To Define and Desire ‘Prestigious’ Jobs. Sociology of Education, 89(1), pp. 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1989). The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., and Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. New York: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S. (2002). The Rise of the ‘Practical Arts. In: S. Brint, ed., The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S. (2013). The ‘Collective Mind’ at Work: A Decade in the Life of Sociology of Education. Sociology of Education, 86(4), pp. 273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1998). Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy. Theory and Society, 27(3), pp. 377–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1972). The Organizational Saga in Higher Education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), pp. 178–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D., and Binder, A. (2016). Selling Students: The Rise of Corporate Partnership Programs in University Career Centers. In: E. Popp Berman and C. Paradeise, eds., The University Under Pressure (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 46). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited., pp. 395–422.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W. (1983). Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), pp. 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F., Sutton, J., Meyer, J., and Scott, W. R. (1993). Equal Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labor Markets. American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), pp. 396–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, K. (2014). The Effect of College on Social and Political Attitudes and Civic Participation. In: N. Gross and S. Simmons, eds., Professors and their Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions Think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, C., Habinek, J., Goldstein, A., Dioun, C., Garcia, D., Godoy, S., and Osley-Thomas, R. (2016). The Financialization of US Higher Education. Socio-Economic Review, 14(1), pp. 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (1984). Negotiated Orders and Organizational Cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, pp. 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granfield, R. (1992). Making Elite Lawyers: Visions of Law at Harvard and Beyond. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigsby, M. (2009). College Life through the Eyes of Students. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, T. (2010). The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School. American Sociological Review, 75(1), pp. 52–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, T., and Ventresca, M. (2006a). How Institutions Form: Loose Coupling as Mechanism in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), pp. 908–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, T., and Ventresca, M. (2006b). Inhabited Institutions: Social Interaction and Organizational Forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theory and Society, 35(2), pp. 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P. and Lounsbury, M. (1997). Ending the Family Quarrel: Toward a Reconciliation of ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), pp. 406–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, P., and Feldman, K. (2004). Forming Identities in College: A Sociological Approach. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), pp. 463–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. (2011). Privilege: The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul’s School. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (2009). How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. (1977). The Effects of Education as an Institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), pp. 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., Ramirez, F., Frank, D.J., Schofer, E, and Gumport, P. (2007). Sociology of Higher Education: Contributions and their Contexts. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), pp. 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, D., and Martin, J. (1987). Cultural Change: An Integration of Three Different Views. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6), pp. 623–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persell, C., and Cookson, P (1985). Chartering and Bartering: Elite Education and Social Reproduction. Social Problems, 33(2), pp. 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popp Berman, E. (2012). Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, D. (2015). Inhabiting Latino Politics: How Colleges Shape Students’ Political Styles. Sociology of Education, 88(4), pp. 302–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, L. (2016). Pedigree: Elite Reproduction in Hiring. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R (2015). Higher Education in America: Multiple Field Perspectives. In: M. K M. Stevens, eds., Remaking College: The Changing Ecology of Higher Education. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M., Armstrong, E., and Arum, R. (2008). Sieve, Incubator, Temple, Hub: Empirical and Theoretical Advances in the Sociology of Higher Education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, pp. 127–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M. (2015). Introduction. In: M. Kirst and M. Stevens, eds., Remaking College: The Changing Ecology of Higher Education. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M. L., and Gebre-Medhin, B. (2016). Association, Service, Market: Higher Education in American Political Development. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, pp. 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuber, J. M. (2012). Inside the College Gates: How Class and Culture Matter in Higher Education. New York: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warikoo, N. (2016). The Diversity Bargain and Other Dilemmas of Race, Admissions, and Meritocracy at Elite Universities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Westenholz, A., Pedersen, J., and Dobbin, F. (2006). Introduction. Institutions in the Making: Identity, Power, and the Emergence of New Organizational Forms. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), pp. 889–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willie, S. (2003). Acting Black: College, Identity, and the Performance of Race. New York: Routledge Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. (1988). Where Do Institutional Patterns Come From? Organizations as Actors in Social Systems. In: L. Zucker, ed., Institutional Patterns and Organizations. Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy J. Binder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Binder, A.J. (2018). Afterword: New Institutional, Inhabited Institutional, and a Cultural-Organizational Approach to Studying Elites and Higher Education. In: Bloch, R., Mitterle, A., Paradeise, C., Peter, T. (eds) Universities and the Production of Elites. Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53970-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53970-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53969-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53970-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics