Skip to main content

Biophysical Properties of Ethnic Skin

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dermatoanthropology of Ethnic Skin and Hair

Abstract

Skin color and melanin content can influence skin physiology and modulate responses to external stimuli. Ethnic differences in some biophysical parameters have been described and may have a relevant role in characterizing ethnic groups, particularly light- and dark-skinned subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shriver MD. Ethnic variation as a key to the biology of human disease. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:401–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman RG, Cockerell EG, Armstrong J, et al. Sunlight as a factor influencing the thickness of epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 1962;39:295–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomson ML. Relative efficiency of pigment and horny layer thickness in protecting the skin of European and Africans against solar ultraviolet radiation. J Physiol (Lond). 1955;127:236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lock-Andersen J, Therkildsen P, de Fine Olivarius F et al. Epidermal thickness, skin pigmentation and constitutive photosensitivity. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. (1997) Aug;13(4):153–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. La Ruche G, Cesarini JP. Histology and physiology of black skin Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1992;119(8):567–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weigand DA, Haygood C, Gaylor JR. Cell layers and density of Negro and Caucasians stratum corneum. J invest Dermatol. 1974;62:563–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kompaore F, Tsuruta H. In vivo differences between Asian, black and white in the stratum corneum barrier function. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1993;65(1 Suppl):S223–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coderch L, Lopez O, De La Maza A, Parra JLV. Ceramides and skin function. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(2):107–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rienertson RP, Wheatley VR. Studies on the chemical composition of human epidermal lipids. J Invest Dermatol. 1959;32:49–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson LC, Corah NL. Racial differences in skin resistance. Science. 1963;139:766–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Corcuff P, Lotte C, Rougier A, Maibach H. Racial differences in corneocytes. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh). 1991;71:146–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugino K, Imokawa G, Maibach H. Ethnic difference of stratum corneum lipid in relation to stratum corneum function. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;100:597.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meguro S, Arai Y, Masukawa Y, Uie K, Tokimitsu I. Relationship between covalently bound ceramides and transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Arch Dermatol Res. 2000;292(9):463–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kompaore F, Marty JP, Dupont Ch. In vivo evaluation of the stratum corneum barrier function in Blacks, Caucasians and Asians with two noninvasive methods. Skin Pharmacol. 1993;6:200–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson D, Berardesca E, Maibach HI. In vitro transepidermal water loss: differences between black and white human skin. Brit J Dermatol. 1988;199:647–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;18:136–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yosipovitch G, Theng CTS. Asian skin: its architecture, function, and differences from caucasian skin. Cosmet Toiletr. 2002;117(9):57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reed JT, Ghadially R, Elias PM. Effect of race, gender and skin type on epidermal permeability barrier function. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;102:537.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Berardesca E, de Rigal J, Leveque JL, Maibach HI. In vivo biophysical characterization of skin physiological differences in races. Dermatologica. 1991;182:89–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baker H. The skin as a barrier (1986). In: Rook A, editors. Textbook of dermatology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 355.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reed JT, Ghadially R, Elias PM. Skin type, but neither race nor gender, influence epidermal permeability function. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(10):1134–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Berardesca E, Pirot F, Singh M, Maibach HI. Differences in stratum corneum pH gradient when comparino white caucasian and black african-american skin. Brit J Dermatol. 1998;139:855–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Warrier AG, Kligman AM, Harper RA, Bowman J, Wickett RR. A comparison of black and white skin using noninvasive methods. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1996;47:229–40.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;18:65–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rietschel RL. A method to evaluate skin moisturizers in vivo. J Invest Dermatol. 1978;70:152–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lapiere CM. The ageing dermis: the main cause for the appearance of “old” skin. Br J Dermatol. 1990;122(Suppl 35):5–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Montagna W, Prota G, Kenney J. The structure of black skin. In: Montagna W, Prota G, Kenney J, editors. Black skin structure and function. USA: Gulf Professional Publishing; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Montagna W, Carlisle K. The architecture of black and white facial skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24(6 Pt 1):929–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nouveau-Richard S, Yang Z, Mac-Mary S, et al. Skin aging: a comparison between Chinese and European populations. A pilot study. J Dermatol Sci. 2005;40(3):187–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Morizot F, Guehenneux S, Dheurle S, et al. Do features of aging differ between Asian and Caucasian women. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;123:A67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vashi NA, de Castro Maymone MB, Kundu RV. Aging differences in ethnic skin. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2016;9(1):31–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Berardesca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berardesca, E., Mariano, M., Cameli, N. (2017). Biophysical Properties of Ethnic Skin. In: Vashi, N., Maibach, H. (eds) Dermatoanthropology of Ethnic Skin and Hair. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53961-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53961-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53960-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53961-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics