Skip to main content
  • 2274 Accesses

Abstract

Similar to the concepts presented for the research question, clinical trial endpoints are structured as primary and secondary. The primary endpoint is associated with the primary research question and hypothesis and therefore is the main outcome of the study. For this reason, it needs to be well defined in advance and needs to be easily measurable with tools that are ideally readily available, simple to use, accurate, and validated. The closer and more consistently the primary endpoint addresses the primary research question the more likely the trial is to produce meaningful results bringing you closer to the critical new knowledge that you seek. Secondary endpoints similarly align with secondary questions and need to be clearly defined up front, but allow the investigator to dig more deeply into the more subtle information provided by the trial that may or may not provide definitive conclusions, but might dictate the direction of future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;31:665–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moseley JB, O’Malley K, Peterson N, et al. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:81–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neumayer L, Gobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1819–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grant AM, Wileman SM, Ramsay CR, et al. Minimal Access surgery compared with medical management for chronic gastrooesophageal reflux disease: UK collaborative randomized trial. Br Med J. 2008;337:a2664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson PR, Kracjer Z, Kansal N, Rao V, Bianchi C, Hashemi H, Jones P, Bacharach JM. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial outcomes of totally percutaneous aortic aneurysm repair (The PEVAR trial). J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:1181–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter R. Nelson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, P.R. (2017). Primary and Secondary Endpoints. In: Itani, K., Reda, D. (eds) Clinical Trials Design in Operative and Non Operative Invasive Procedures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53877-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53877-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53876-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53877-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics