Skip to main content
  • 1378 Accesses

Abstract

Clinical trial design starts with the development of a focused, concise, answerable primary research question. The time spent defining this question up front is as valuable as the time that will be spent conducting the trial itself. Start simple with real ideas that are meaningful to your clinical practice and specialty. Refine your ideas into a more defined research question. This research question needs to be relevant, needs to translate to the primary hypothesis to be tested, needs to set the steps in motion to define the research methodology and analytic plan for the trial, needs to be answerable, and ultimately needs to offer promise that this answer will provide critical new knowledge that will change clinical practice for the better and improve patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;31:665–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moseley JB, O’Malley K, Peterson N, et al. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:81–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neumayer L, Gobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1819–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grant AM, Wileman SM, Ramsay CR, et al. Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for chronic gastrooesophageal reflux disease: UK collaborative randomized trial. Br Med J. 2008;337:a2664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson PR, Kracjer Z, Kansal N, Rao V, Bianchi C, Hashemi H, Jones P, Bacharach JM. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial outcomes of totally percutaneous aortic aneurysm repair (The PEVAR Trial). J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:1181–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter R. Nelson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, P.R. (2017). The Research Question and the Hypothesis. In: Itani, K., Reda, D. (eds) Clinical Trials Design in Operative and Non Operative Invasive Procedures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53877-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53877-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53876-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53877-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics