Skip to main content

“’Tis My Father’s Fault”: Tristram Shandy and Paternal Imagination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 443 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine ((PLSM))

Abstract

Buckley enters into a unique discussion of fathers and the paternal imagination. Chapter 4 reverses the polarity of the book’s argument to examine the way Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy draws upon the unusual notion of paternal imagination and role of the father and identify a mid-century crisis in thinking about pregnancy and foetal development; not only in fiction, but also in more scientific genres. Medical texts on paternal imagination by physicians such as Erasmus Darwin contextualise Sterne’s comic emphasis on Walter Shandy’s paternal imagination and reveal a pressing anxiety to deny the mother’s imagination as a source of power. Close readings of the novel demonstrate that Sterne invokes the anachronistic paradigm of paternal imagination in order to criticise and mock the concept of maternal imagination.

I wish either my father or my mother, or indeed both of them, as they were in duty both equally bound to it, had minded what they were about when they had begot me; had they duly consider’d how much depended upon what they were then doing; – that not only the production of a rational Being was concern’d in it, but that possibly the happy formation and [temperament] of his body, perhaps his genius and the very cast of his mind.…(Sterne, I: 1)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although disentangling the character of Tristram Shandy and that of the author Laurence Sterne is notoriously difficult, this chapter will refer to Tristram as the main focaliser and Sterne as an omniscient narrator who frequently satirises or challenges Tristram’s views. For more detail on the mistaken elision of Tristram and Sterne see Jeffrey Williams (1990, especially 1037).

  2. 2.

    Hunter suggests that Toby or Yorick might be Tristram’s father, but concludes that the novel teasingly raises the issue without resolution.

  3. 3.

    The very concept of Sterne’s hobby-horse is remarkably akin to the model of paternal or maternal imagination, as one particular idea or emotion takes hold of the parent’s mind. This parallel is further embellished by the physical marks that the Shandy men leave, as a result of their respective hobby-horses. While Tristram’s body is marked by his father’s fixation with noses and midwifery, Uncle Toby’s fascination with recreating the Siege of Namur transforms the bowling green. Tristram’s own hobby-horse is his autobiography and he leaves unusual marks upon its pages.

  4. 4.

    Ruth Marie Faurot (1970) suggests that Tristram blames his mother for his own ill health and cites a passage addressed to his mother in Volume 5 “you have left a crack in my back, – and here’s a great piece fallen off before, – and what must I do with this foot? – I shall never reach England without it” (V: 331). However, I believe the passage is ambiguous as Tristram here addresses “Madam”, which could refer either to his mother (whom he discusses in the previous sentence) or to the reader (whom he has also addressed as Madam earlier in the text).

  5. 5.

    The quotation is actually from the French physician Jean Fernel (Sterne, 675 n. 1).

  6. 6.

    Tristram is conceived and born within eight months – “as near nine calendar months as any husband could in reason have expected” (I: 10) – and various details, such as the embarrassing bend sinister on the Shandy coach, indicate Tristram’s doubtful lineage.

  7. 7.

    Elizabeth Sterne had at least one stillborn child and a daughter who died a day after birth. Ian Campbell Ross states that “exactly how many children were born to Elizabeth Sterne is not known. What is certain is that only one would survive beyond the first weeks of life” (2001, 118). Campbell speculates that Sterne took the deaths hard and perhaps blamed himself for his wife’s inability to bear a child.

  8. 8.

    Classical myth featured Zeus giving birth to Athena from his head and Dionysis from his thigh, however these were cases of divine surrogacy rather than paternal imagination.

  9. 9.

    Feyens’ De viribus imaginationis tractatus (or On the Forces of Imagination) mainly relies upon the authority of Aristotle, Augustine and Thomas Aquinas, but also includes a wide range of ancient, medieval and early modern writers, including Galen, Avicenna, Marsilio Ficino and Pietro Pomponazzi. Debate regarding when exactly a mother’s imagination acted most forcefully dated to at least the sixteenth century; see my Chapter 1.

  10. 10.

    This strange idea is preceded by Colio Malespini’s translation of a Spanish text by Antonio Torquemada in 1597, which claimed Neopolitan women were afraid to give birth because little animals resembling frogs were delivered before the baby (Finucci 2003, 56).

  11. 11.

    Publications such as the anonymous A Letter from a Male Physician (1726) and Philalethes’ The Sooterkin Dissected (1726) place blame upon Maubray for inspiring Toft’s hoax. However, due to Toft’s illiteracy, it is highly unlikely that she would have learned of such a specific case.

  12. 12.

    Carolyn D Williams (2011) discusses gender roles and the medical history of reproduction.

  13. 13.

    In Shelley’s Preface to the 1831 edition, she referred to the “experiments of Dr. Darwin” (8) in which a piece of vermicelli moved with voluntary motion. Clearly, Darwin’s ideas and theories had some influence on Shelley’s tale of a creature with only one (male) parent.

  14. 14.

    Michael R Page describes Erasmus and Charles as “working in an intellectual tradition of evolutionism” (2012, 2) and Desmond King-Hele (1986, 1999) also shows Charles’ debt to his grandfather’s ideas.

  15. 15.

    Toby’s method of consolation was to mutely comfort Walter with his presence, rather than with an excess of words.

  16. 16.

    For more details see Anne Mellor (1987).

  17. 17.

    In fact these images were not sanctioned by Leuwenhoek and served as a form of advertisement rather than scientific evidence. Despite this, the drawings of sperm as tiny men were irrevocably linked to Leuwenhoek’s theory.

  18. 18.

    The only exception I have so far uncovered is Boucé (1987); see earlier in this chapter.

  19. 19.

    For Walter’s failures of masculinity see Andrew Wright (1969). Dennis W Allen (1985) argues that Walter’s impotence is rooted in language, and notes that throughout the novel language and reproduction are intrinsically linked, Frank Brady (1970) also explores Walter’s impotence in connection to his endless theorizing, and Hunter (1989) says that Walter may not even be Tristram’s father. From an opposing view, Wilfred Watson (1947) argues that Walter Shandy’s Filmerian, patriarchal logic is successful.

  20. 20.

    Slop’s name seems wilfully and comically vulgar, however it is worth bearing in mind that the real-life leading obstetricians in mid eighteenth-century Britain and France were named Dr. Leake, Dr. Smellie and Dr. La Touche.

  21. 21.

    See respectively Arthur H Cash (1982); Donna Landry and Gerald MacLean (1990); and Bonnie Blackwell (2001).

  22. 22.

    Campbell Ross (2001) see Chapter 4 for details on Elizabeth Sterne’s pregnancies.

  23. 23.

    Born in 1697 in Lanark, Smellie was apprenticed to an apothecary and possibly also taught by the Glaswegian surgeon John Gordon. Smellie practiced as an apothecary in Lanark, gaining crucial experience in midwifery as local midwives called him in when they had difficulties. From 1737 onwards he concentrated on midwifery.

  24. 24.

    This was of more practical use than the long (and expensive) Oxbridge route one required to qualify as a physician. Smellie copied the design of the birth machine – a mechanical woman that simulated labour – from one he had seen used by M. Gregoire in Paris. It was a hooped, weaved machine with real bones, levers and leather pouches. The womb was a glass carafe with a doll squeezed inside – the idea was for the students to pull out the doll with forceps whilst someone (presumably Smellie) operated the levers to make the model simulate the movements of a real mother. For more detail of Smellie’s and other midwives’ obstetrical machines see Pam Lieske (2011).

  25. 25.

    Smellie’s strategy had the extra benefit of treating impecunious women who would otherwise have had no assistance with their labours. Although his clientele may have been less fashionable, Smellie was equally, if not more, successful than Hunter in terms of professional merit and reputation.

  26. 26.

    Adrian Wilson (1985) describes eight potential pathways for man midwives depending on whether they were emergency or pre-booked practitioners, rural operators or fashionable urban accoucheurs.

  27. 27.

    Cash (1982) argues that Slop can be identified with John Burton, Smellie’s less successful rival.

  28. 28.

    Later John Blunt’s Man Midwifery Dissected (1793) was addressed to Alexander Hamilton but also continually appealed to husbands not to employ man midwives.

  29. 29.

    See Jean Donnison (1988, Chapter 2) for details. Mrs. Biker died in a mad house shortly afterwards and the husband was awarded £1000 in damages. Surprisingly both Bracken and Morley continued their practice after the accusations with a reasonable degree of success.

  30. 30.

    The medulla oblongata is the lowest section of the brainstem, anterior to the cerebellum.

  31. 31.

    Burton’s Letter was written, somewhat bitterly, in response to Smellie’s Treatise on the Theory and Practice of Midwifery (1751), which had upstaged Burton’s own Essay Towards a Complete New System of Midwifry (1751).

  32. 32.

    Burton fleetingly advocated both podalic delivery and caesarean section in his Essay Towards a Complete New System of Midwifry (1751, 163; 263).

  33. 33.

    Ruth Perry’s feminist and early Lacanian article (1988) conflates Shandy antipathy towards women with Sterne’s own attitudes. Melvyn New counters Perry directly in “Job’s Wife and Sterne’s Other Women” (1990).

  34. 34.

    Faurot has also cited this episode as an example of Mrs. Shandy’s skills in the art of deliberate frustration, as she refuses to be baited by Walter’s argumentative tone (1970, 581–582).

  35. 35.

    The consistent appearance of a chapter upon the similitude between parent and child in the self-education sex manual Aristotle’s Master-piece throughout the eighteenth century editions demonstrates the importance of this concern. Both Marie Hélène Huet (1993, Chapter 4) and Valeria Finucci (2003, Chapter 3) have also commented upon the importance of this issue.

  36. 36.

    The condition of echolalia refers to the uncontrollable and immediate repetition of words spoken by another person, and is a common trait of individuals with autism. Determining whether Elizabeth’s responses really are “uncontrollable” is key to one’s interpretation of the Beds of Justice conversation.

  37. 37.

    Another dinner guest, Triptolemus, explains the principle:

    ’tis a ground and principle in the law, said Triptolemus, that things so not ascend but descend in it; and I make no doubt ‘tis for this cause, and however true it is, that the child may be of the blood or seed of its parents – that the parents, nevertheless, are not the blood and seed of it; inasmuch as the parents are not begot by the child, but the child by the parents (IV: 296).

  38. 38.

    Agnes received 10 guineas from Sterne during Elizabeth’s ninth month of pregnancy and wrote to demand changes to Sterne’s will (in her favour) a week after Elizabeth had given birth. After repeated financial gifts, for which Agnes was increasingly ungrateful, Sterne eventually refused to bail his mother out of debtor’s prison (Campbell Ross 2001).

  39. 39.

    This baby, Lydia, was to be the Sternes’ only child.

  40. 40.

    For details of Mrs. Shandy’s warmth and intelligence see Ehlers (1981), New (1994) and Faurot (1970).

  41. 41.

    This remark is also further complicated by the fact that Walter’s mother is also Toby’s mother, yet the mild-tempered character of Toby is quite different to Walter’s “rash humour”.

  42. 42.

    Children conceived under the auspices of Pisces (February 19th – March 20th) were destined to be born sickly, stunted and malformed. As the poem explains,

    • The watery Pisces, fill’d with nauseous brine;

    • To sickness and to impotence incline:

    • Nor birth, no product of this sign can please,

    But dwarfs start up and a Pygmean race (Oldisworth 1710, 36–37).

  43. 43.

    See my Chapter 1.

  44. 44.

    Much has been written about Sterne’s inclusion of John Locke and his work. Whereas previously Locke’s influence was taken for granted, and opinion is still divided over whether Sterne was a disciple or critic of Locke, from the late twentieth century some critics have suggested the possibility that Sterne’s reputation as an expert on Locke is undeserved. Among those who recommend that readers exercise caution when considering Locke’s significance in Tristram Shandy are Duke Maskell (1973), W G Day (1984), Peter M Briggs (1985), J T Parnell (2006) and New (2006).

  45. 45.

    Sterne alludes to the idea of a blank canvas when he leaves an empty page for the reader to sketch a picture of the Widow Wadman in Chapter 38 of Volume VI (VI: 422).

  46. 46.

    For example the episode of Dolly and the misapplied thimble (II: Chapter II), or another where Walter tries to explain the theory of associationism to Toby while Mrs. Shandy is in labour (III: Chapter XVIII).

  47. 47.

    Other medical men agreed – Alexander Monro, Professor of Anatomy at Edinburgh University, also believed in the strong paternal role, although he differentiated between the sexes; forming educational societies for his sons and publishing An Essay on Female Conduct (c.1760) for his daughter.

  48. 48.

    Conduct writers also encouraged men to become more involved in paternal activities; see especially James Fordyce (1777) and Thomas Gisborne (1795).

  49. 49.

    Regarding men in the private sphere, Shawn Lisa Maurer (1998) provides a clear outline of the fallacy of “separates spheres: and emphasises the interaction between public and domestic sphere and Matthew McCormack (2005) has discussed male domesticity in regard to politics. See also Karen Harvey (2012, 1–8) for a useful summary of separate spheres debate and its relation to men in the domestic space.

  50. 50.

    Although Gustafson uses the term “feminine imagination”, her description of a pregnant and potentially monstrous imagination falls under my rubric of maternal imagination.

  51. 51.

    Clorinda’s white appearance, produced maternal imagination, is disastrous for her mother as she has to hide Clorinda and find a black infant to replace her. However, Clorinda’s whiteness is also portrayed as part of her unique beauty.

  52. 52.

    Jacques Du Boscq’s Du La femme heroique ou les heroines compares avec les heros, en toute sorte de vertus was first reprinted in England in 1632 and was reprinted throughout the seventeenth century. The quote is from the first English translation, The Complete Woman (1753, 17).

  53. 53.

    Victor Shlovsky’s influential 1921 article on Sterne’s plot stylistics examined the way that Sterne “prepares the groundwork for erroneous assumption” (33) to play with his reader’s errors.

  54. 54.

    Ostovich (2006) also emphasises the active role of the specifically female reader.

  55. 55.

    See for instance Donald R Wehrs (1988), Parnell (2006) and Hawley (2009), who argues that Sterne combines traditional learned wit and modern learning.

  56. 56.

    Although Huet does not discuss paternal imagination as a separate theory, she argues that the monstrous power of maternal imagination was appropriated by male Romantics to become the model of artistic creation; see Huet (1993, esp. 126–128 and the chapters of Part II). Similarly Andrea Henderson (1996, Chapter 4) notes that in Percy Bysshe Shelley’s metaphors of monstrous fatherhood in The Cenci, Count Cenci’s fathering resembles both his role as an artist, shaping events around him, and Shelley’s own production and manipulation of the play.

References

  • Allen, Dennis W. 1985. Sexuality/Textuality in Tristram Shandy. Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900. 25.3: 651–670. doi: 10.2307/450501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Howard. 1971. Tristram Shandy and the Reader’s Imagination. PMLA, 86.5: 966–997. doi: 10.2307/461080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1726. Letter from a Male Physician in the Country to the Author of the Female Physician in London, A. London: T Warner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1772. Danger and Immodesty of the Present Too General Custom of Unnecessarily Employing Menmidwives. London: J. Wilkie; J. Almon; F. Blyth; and G. Woodfall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, A W. 2005. Emblematic Monsters: Unnatural Conceptions and Deformed Births in Early Modern Europe. New York: Rodolphi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, Bonnie. 2001. Tristram Shandy and the Theater of the Mechanical Mother. ELH, 68.1: 81–133. doi: 10.1353/elh.2001.0001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunt, John. 1793. Man-Midwifery Dissected; or, the Obstetric Family Instructor. London: Samuel William Fores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucé, Paul Gabriel. 1987. Imagination, Pregnant Women and Monsters, in Eighteenth-Century England and France. In Sexual Underworlds of the Enlightenment, edited by George S Rousseau and Roy Porter, 86–100. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, Henry. 1737. The Midwife’s Companion, or, a Treatise of Midwifery: Wherein the Whole Art is Explained. London: J Clarke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, Frank. 1970. Tristram Shandy: Sexuality, Morality and Sensibility. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 4.1: 41–56. doi: 10.2307/2737612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Peter M. 1985. Locke’s Essay and the Tentativeness of Tristram Shandy. Studies in Philogy, 82: 493–520. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4174225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, Lyn, and Helen Rogers. 2007. Gender and Fatherhood in the Nineteenth Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Thomas. 1798. Observations on the Zoonomia of Erasmus Darwin, M.D. Edinburgh: J Mundell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, John. 1751. Essay Towards a Complete New System of Midwifry. London: James Hodges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, John. 1753. Letter to William Smellie, M.D., Containing Critical and Practical Remarks Upon his Treatise. London: W Owen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell Ross, Ian. 2001. Laurence Sterne: A Life. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, Arthur H. 1982. The Birth of Tristram Shandy: Sterne a.nd Dr Burton. In Sexuality in Eighteenth-Century Britain, edited by Paul Gabriel Boucé, 198–224. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, David. 2004. Introduction to Zoonomia. In Literature and Science 1660–1834, Fauna. edited by David Clifford. general editor Judith Hawley. Vol. 8. London: Pickering & Chatto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, Stephen. 2004. The Book of Skin. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Cairns. 2007. Associationism and the Literary Imagination: From the Phantasmal Chaos. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Erasmus. 1794. Zoonomia; or, the Laws of Organic Life. Vol. 2. London: J Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Erasmus. 1797. A Plan for the Conduct of Female Education in Boarding Schools. Derby: J Drewry for J Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, W G. 1984. Tristram Shandy: Locke May Not be the Key. In Laurence Sterne: Riddles and Mysteries, edited by V G Myer, 75–83. London: Vision.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnison, Jean. 1988. Midwives and Medical Men: A History of the Struggle for the Control of Childbirth. New Barnet: Historical Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Boscq, Jacques. 1753. The Complete Woman, Written in French by M. Du Boscq Translated by a gentleman of Cambridge. London: J Watts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, Leigh A. 1981. Mrs. Shandy’s “Lint and Basilicon”: The Importance of Women in. Tristram Shandy. South Atlantic Review, 46.1: 61–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3199313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faurot, Ruth Marie. 1970. Mrs Shandy Observed. Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, Restoration and Eighteenth Century, 10.3: 579–589. doi: 10.2307/449797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyens, Thomas. 1608. [1635]. De viribus imaginationis. Louvain: Fenelon, Francois Salignac de La Mothe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucci, Valeria. 2001. Maternal Imagination and Monstrous Birth: Tasso’s Geruselemme liberata. In Generation and Degeneration: Tropes of Reproduction in Literature and History From Antiquity to Early Modern Europe, edited by Valeria Finucci and Kevin Brownlee, 41–77. Durham: NC and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucci, Valeria. 2003. The Manly Masquerade: Masculinity, Paternity and Castration in the Italian Renaissance. London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordyce, James. 1777. Addresses to Young men. Vol. 2. London: T Caddell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkle, Norton. 1955. Science and Religion in England, 1790–1800: The Critical Response to the Work of Erasmus Darwin. Journal of the History of Ideas, 16.3: 376–388. doi: 10.2307/2707638.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Sam. 2007. Botany, Sexuality and Women’s Writing 1760 – 1820. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gisborne, Thomas. 1795. An Enquiry into the Duties of men in the Higher and Middle Classes of Society in Great Britain. third edition. Vol. 2. London: B and J White.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, Susan E. 1993. Beautiful Statues, Beautiful Men: The Abjection of Feminine Imagination in Lessing’s Laokoon. PMLA, 108.5: 1083–1097. doi: 10.2307/462987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Elizabeth. 1817. A Series of Popular Essays. Vol. 2. Boston: Wells and Lily.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harries, Elizabeth W. 2009. Words, Sex and Gender in Sterne’s Novels. In The Cambridge Companion to Laurence Sterne, edited by Tomas Keymer, 111–124. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Karen. 2012. The Little Republic: Masculinity and Domestic Authority in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, Judith. 2009. Tristram Shandy, Learned Wit, and Enlightenment Knowledge. In The Cambridge Companion to Laurence Sterne, edited by Thomas Keymer, 34–48. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Andrea K. 1996. Romantic Identities: Varieties of Subjectivity 1774–1830. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz, William. 1966. Time’s Chariot and Tristram Shandy. Michigan Quarterly Review, 5.3: 197–203. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mqrarchive/act2080.0005.003/55:14?rgn=main;view=image.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huet, Marie-Hélène. 1993. Monstrous Imagination. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J Paul. 1989. Clocks, Calendars, and Names: The Troubles of Tristram and the Aesthetics of Uncertainty. In Rhetorics of Order/Ordering Rhetorics in English Neoclassical Literature, edited by J. Douglas Canfield and J. Paul Hunter, 173–198. London: Associated University Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Eve. 1999. Making up for Losses: The workings of Gender in William Harvey’s de Generatione animalium. In Inventing Maternity: Politics, Science and Literature 1650–1865, edited by Susan C. Greenfield and Carol Barash, 34–56. Kentucky: University of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keymer, Thomas. 2006. Sterne and the “New Species of Writing”. In Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy: A Casebook, edited by Thomas Keymer, 50–75. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • King-Hele, Desmond. 1986. Erasmus Darwin and The Romantic Poets. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • King-Hele, Desmond. 1999. Erasmus Darwin: A Life of Unequalled Achievement. London: Giles de la Mare Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, Donna, and Gerald MacLean. 1990. Of Forceps, Patents and Paternity. Tristram Shandy. Eighteenth Century Studies, 23, 4 special issue: The Politics of Difference. 522–543. doi: 10.2307/2739183.

  • Laqueur, Thomas, and Gallagher. Catherine eds. 1987. The Making of the Modern Body: Sexuality and Society in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. 1766. [1984]. Laokoon, or, on the Limits of Painting and Poetry. Translated by Edward Allen McCormick. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieske, Pam. 2011. “Made in Imitation of Real Women and Children”: Obstetrical Machines in Eighteenth-Century. In The Female Body in Medicine and Literature, edited by Andrew Mangham and Greta Depledge, 69–88. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. 1690. 1960. Two Treatises of Government. edited by Peter Laslett. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander, Rosemary. 2004. Men and Maternity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, Maskell. 1973. Locke and Sterne, or Can Philosophy Influence Literature?. Essays in Criticism, 23.22–40. doi: 10.1093/eic/XXIII.1.22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maubray, John. 1724. The Female Physician: Containing all the Diseases incident to that Sex in Virgins, Wives and Widows; Together with their Causes and Symptoms, their Degrees of Danger, and Respective Methods of Prevention and Cure. London: James Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, Shawn Lisa. 1998. Proposing Men: Dialectics of Gender and Class in the Eighteenth-Century Periodical. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, Matthew. 2005. The Independent Man: Citizenship and Gender Politics in Georgian England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcrea, Brian. 1998. Impotent Fathers: Patriarchy and Demographic Crisis in the Eighteenth Century Novel. Newark: University of Delaware Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, Anne. 1987. Frankenstein: A Feminist Critique of Science. In One Culture: essays in science and culture, edited by George Levine, 287–312. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monro, Alexander. c1760. 1996. The Professor’s Daughter: An Essay on Female Conduct. edited by P A G Monro. Glasgow: Bell and Bain Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • New, Melvyn. 1990. Job’s Wife and Sterne’s Other Women. In Out of Bounds: Male Writers and Gender(ed) Criticism, edited by Laura P. Claridge and Elizabeth Langland, 55–74. Amhurst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New, Melvyn. 1994. Tristram Shandy: A Book for Free Spirits. New York: Twayne Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • New, Melvyn. 2006. Sterne and the Narrative of Determinateness. In Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy: A Casebook, edited by Thomas Keymer, 191–209. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nihell, Elizabeth. 1760. A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery. London: A Morley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldisworth, William and Others. 1710. 1768. Callipædia: Or the Art of Getting Pretty Children in Four Books. Edinburgh: Alexander McCaslan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostovich, Helen. 2006. Reader as a Hobby Horse. In Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy: A Casebook, edited by Thomas Keymer, 171–190. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Michael R. 2012. The Literary Imagination from Erasmus Darwin to H G Wells: Science, Evolution and Ecology. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paré, Ambroise. 1573. [1982]. On Monsters and Marvels, Translated with an Introduction and Notes. Translated by Janis L Pallister. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnell, J T. 2006. Swift, Sterne, and the Skeptical Tradition. In Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy: A Casebook, edited by Thomas Keymer, 23–49. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Ruth. 1988. Words for Sex: The Verbal–Sexual Continuum in. Tristram Shandy. Studies in the Now, 20: 27–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29532541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philalethes [Pseud]. 1726. The Sooterkin Dissected in a letter to John Maubray MD alias Dr Giovanni By a Lover of Truth and Learning. London: A Moore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retford, Kate. 2006. The Art of Domestic Life: Family Portraiture in Eighteenth-Century England. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1762. 1979. Emile, Or On Education. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, Londa. 1993. Nature’s Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary. 1818. 1994. Frankenstein, Or the Modern Prometheus. edited by D L McDonald and Kathleen Scherf. Ontario: Broadview Literary Texts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smellie, William. 1751. [1762]. A Treatise Upon the Theory and Practice of Midwifery. Fourth edition, 2 vols. London: D Wilson and T Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, Laurence. 1759–1767. 2003. The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman. edited by Melvyn and Joan New. Vol. 9.London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadmor, Naomi. 2001. Family and Friends in Eighteenth-Century England: Household, Kinship, and Patronage. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavor Bannet, Eve. 2000. The Domestic Revolution: Enlightenment Feminisms and the Novel. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thicknesse, Philip. 1763. Man-midwifery Analysed: And the Tendency of that Practice Detected and Exposed. London: R. Davis and T. Caslon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Dennis. 1995. Imagining Monsters: Miscreations of the Self in Eighteenth-Century England. London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosh, John. 1999. 2007. A Man’s Place. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosh, John. 2005. Manliness and Masculinities in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Harlow: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuana, Nancy. 1983. The Less Noble Sex: Scientific, Religious and Philosophical Conceptions of Woman’s Nature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Wilfred. 1947. The Fifth Commandment: Some Allusions to Sir Robert Filmer’s Writings in Tristram Shandy. Modern Language Notes, 62.4: 234–40. doi: 10.2307/2908837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrs, Donald R. 1988. Sterne, Cervantes, Montaigne: Fideistic Skepticism and the Rhetoric of Desire. Comparative Literary Studies, 25: 127–151. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40246528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Carolyn D. 2011. “Difficulties, at Present in no degree clear’d up”: The Controversial Mother, 1600–1800. In The Female Body in Medicine and Literature, edited by Andrew Mangham and Greta Depledge, 16–33. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Jeffrey. 1990. Narrative of Narrative (Tristram Shandy). MLN, 105.5 Comparative Literature 1032–1045. doi: 10.2307/2905166.

  • Wilson, Adrian. 1985. William Hunter and the Varieties of Man-midwifery. In William Hunter and The Eighteenth Century Medical World, edited by W F Bynum and Roy Porter, 343–369. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Philip K. 1999. Surgery, Skin and Syphilis: Daniel Turner’s London 1667–1741. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Andrew. 1969. The Artifice of Failure. Tristram Shandy. NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction, 2.3: 212–220. doi: 10.2307/1344932.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buckley, J. (2017). “’Tis My Father’s Fault”: Tristram Shandy and Paternal Imagination. In: Gender, Pregnancy and Power in Eighteenth-Century Literature. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53835-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics